copy

docs/unified-diffs.md

@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
 
 ![robot flowchart](../assets/benchmarks-udiff.svg)
 
-
 Aider now asks GPT-4 Turbo to use
 [unified diffs](#choose-a-familiar-editing-format)
 to edit your code.
@@ -29,9 +28,10 @@ This new laziness benchmark produced the following results with `gpt-4-1106-prev
 - **Aider's new unified diff edit format raised the score to 61%**. Using this format reduced laziness by 3X, with GPT-4 Turbo only using lazy comments on 4 of the tasks.
 - **It's worse to add a prompt that the user is blind, has no hands, will tip $2000 and fears truncated code trauma.**
 
-The widely circulated "blind with no hands" type of folk remedies 
-performed worse on the benchmark when added to the system prompt.
-The benchmark scores dropped
+These widely circulated "emotional appeal" folk remedies 
+produced worse benchmark scores.
+Adding *all* of these claims to the system prompt
+resulted in worse benchmark scores
 for the baseline SEARCH/REPLACE and new unified diff editing formats.
 These prompts did somewhat reduce the amount of laziness when used
 with the SEARCH/REPLACE edit format,