Multiple concept generation methods are implemented in ASP, and compared in runtime for a randomly generated set of contexts of various size and density, and also proved to work by testing against controlled and verified sets of contexts.
Here is the main result of this repository: showing that all methods are roughly equivalent.
The false method is a reference: a method that do nothing, and thus expected to fail (this is verified by unit tests).
Verify that all methods find correctly the expected solutions/concepts in hand-crafted contexts.
make tests
Should be all green.
Extensive computation. Will melt your CPU and generate the output.csv file.
make benchmark
Should be all white.
Using the results of the benchmark, allow one to visualize the results. You should hack around the drawing module to get exactly what you want (by default it just look for measures about contexts with a density of 0.4).
make draw
Should be all fighting for the first place.
See requirements.
See methods module to see the methods automatic and static generation.