Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK. #513
Conversation
|
Hi @Howard229 ~ Thanks for your contribution in this PR. ❤️ Please make sure that your PR conforms the standard, and has passed all the checks. We will review your PR as soon as possible. |
|
#510 |
|
Hey @Howard229 : Something wrong occuried during the checks of your commit 😟, please check the detail:
|
|
Hey @Howard229 : Congratulations~ 🎉 Your commit has passed all the checks. Please wait for further manual review. |
polardb-bot
bot
added
ci/success
|
@Howard229 hi, I find this commit is actually a community commit from PostgreSQL. Can you cherry-pick this commit to keep the original author of this patch? Also, you should pick the one which resides on PostgreSQL's |
COMMIT/ROLLBACK necessarily destroys all snapshots within the session. The original implementation of intra-procedure transactions just cavalierly did that, ignoring the fact that this left us executing in a rather different environment than normal. In particular, it turns out that handling of toasted datums depends rather critically on there being an outer ActiveSnapshot: otherwise, when SPI or the core executor pop whatever snapshot they used and return, it's unsafe to dereference any toasted datums that may appear in the query result. It's possible to demonstrate "no known snapshots" and "missing chunk number N for toast value" errors as a result of this oversight. Historically this outer snapshot has been held by the Portal code, and that seems like a good plan to preserve. So add infrastructure to pquery.c to allow re-establishing the Portal-owned snapshot if it's not there anymore, and add enough bookkeeping support that we can tell whether it is or not. We can't, however, just re-establish the Portal snapshot as part of COMMIT/ROLLBACK. As in normal transaction start, acquiring the first snapshot should wait until after SET and LOCK commands. Hence, teach spi.c about doing this at the right time. (Note that this patch doesn't fix the problem for any PLs that try to run intra-procedure transactions without using SPI to execute SQL commands.) This makes SPI's no_snapshots parameter rather a misnomer, so in HEAD, rename that to allow_nonatomic. replication/logical/worker.c also needs some fixes, because it wasn't careful to hold a snapshot open around AFTER trigger execution. That code doesn't use a Portal, which I suspect someday we're gonna have to fix. But for now, just rearrange the order of operations. This includes back-patching the recent addition of finish_estate() to centralize the cleanup logic there. This also back-patches commit 2ecfeda into v13, to improve the test coverage for worker.c (it was that test that exposed that worker.c's snapshot management is wrong). Per bug #15990 from Andreas Wicht. Back-patch to v11 where intra-procedure COMMIT was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Howard229
force-pushed
the
POLARDB_11_DEV
branch
from
ee1d413 to
a8021dd
Compare
|
|
As you mentioned, I have retained the original author in this commit, but does the original author need to sign the CLA (Contributor License Agreement)? So, what should I do next? |
No need, forget about it. Let's wait until all regression passed. |
|
Hey @Howard229 : Congratulations~ 🎉 Your commit has passed all the checks. Please wait for further manual review. |
polardb-bot
bot
added
ci/success
All regressions have been passed except for license/CLA |
mrdrivingduck
merged commit 3ebc3d9
into
ApsaraDB:POLARDB_11_DEV
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
COMMIT/ROLLBACK necessarily destroys all snapshots within the session.
The original implementation of intra-procedure transactions just
cavalierly did that, ignoring the fact that this left us executing in
a rather different environment than normal. In particular, it turns
out that handling of toasted datums depends rather critically on there
being an outer ActiveSnapshot: otherwise, when SPI or the core
executor pop whatever snapshot they used and return, it's unsafe to
dereference any toasted datums that may appear in the query result.
It's possible to demonstrate "no known snapshots" and "missing chunk
number N for toast value" errors as a result of this oversight.
Historically this outer snapshot has been held by the Portal code,
and that seems like a good plan to preserve. So add infrastructure
to pquery.c to allow re-establishing the Portal-owned snapshot if it's
not there anymore, and add enough bookkeeping support that we can tell
whether it is or not.
We can't, however, just re-establish the Portal snapshot as part of
COMMIT/ROLLBACK. As in normal transaction start, acquiring the first
snapshot should wait until after SET and LOCK commands. Hence, teach
spi.c about doing this at the right time. (Note that this patch
doesn't fix the problem for any PLs that try to run intra-procedure
transactions without using SPI to execute SQL commands.)
This makes SPI's no_snapshots parameter rather a misnomer, so in HEAD,
rename that to allow_nonatomic.
replication/logical/worker.c also needs some fixes, because it wasn't
careful to hold a snapshot open around AFTER trigger execution.
That code doesn't use a Portal, which I suspect someday we're gonna
have to fix. But for now, just rearrange the order of operations.
This includes back-patching the recent addition of finish_estate()
to centralize the cleanup logic there.
This also back-patches commit 2ecfeda into v13, to improve the
test coverage for worker.c (it was that test that exposed that
worker.c's snapshot management is wrong).
Per bug #15990 from Andreas Wicht. Back-patch to v11 where
intra-procedure COMMIT was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
cherry-pick
ef94805096229ee3573624465a76ca11d2bd8529fromPostgreSQL's
REL_11_STANLEbranch，and resolved some code conflicts。