[tune](deps): Bump datasets from 1.11.0 to 1.16.1 in /python/requirements/tune #10
Conversation
![dependabot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/29110?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Bumps [datasets](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets) from 1.11.0 to 1.16.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/releases) - [Commits](huggingface/datasets@1.11.0...1.16.1) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: datasets dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
dependabot
bot
added
the
dependencies
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
26 similar comments
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
2 similar comments
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
We encountered SIGSEGV when running Python test `python/ray/tests/test_failure_2.py::test_list_named_actors_timeout`. The stack is: ``` #0 0x00007fffed30f393 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #1 0x00007fffee707649 in ray::RayLog::GetLoggerName() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #2 0x00007fffee70aa90 in ray::SpdLogMessage::Flush() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #3 0x00007fffee70af28 in ray::RayLog::~RayLog() () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #4 0x00007fffee2b570d in ray::asio::testing::(anonymous namespace)::DelayManager::Init() [clone .constprop.0] () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #5 0x00007fffedd0d95a in _GLOBAL__sub_I_asio_chaos.cc () from /home/admin/dev/Arc/merge/ray/python/ray/_raylet.so #6 0x00007ffff7fe282a in call_init.part () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #7 0x00007ffff7fe2931 in _dl_init () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #8 0x00007ffff7fe674c in dl_open_worker () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #9 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #10 0x00007ffff7fe5ffe in _dl_open () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #11 0x00007ffff7d5f39c in dlopen_doit () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 #12 0x00007ffff7b82e79 in _dl_catch_exception () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #13 0x00007ffff7b82f13 in _dl_catch_error () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #14 0x00007ffff7d5fb09 in _dlerror_run () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 #15 0x00007ffff7d5f42a in dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 () from /lib64/libdl.so.2 #16 0x00007fffef04d330 in py_dl_open (self=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at /tmp/python-build.20220507135524.257789/Python-3.7.11/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:1369 ``` The root cause is that when loading `_raylet.so`, `static DelayManager _delay_manager` is initialized and `RAY_LOG(ERROR) << "RAY_testing_asio_delay_us is set to " << delay_env;` is executed. However, the static variables declared in `logging.cc` are not initialized yet (in this case, `std::string RayLog::logger_name_ = "ray_log_sink"`). It's better not to rely on the initialization order of static variables in different compilation units because it's not guaranteed. I propose to change all `RAY_LOG`s to `std::cerr` in `DelayManager::Init()`. The crash happens in Ant's internal codebase. Not sure why this test case passes in the community version though. BTW, I've tried different approaches: 1. Using a static local variable in `get_delay_us` and remove the global variable. This doesn't work because `init()` needs to access the variable as well. 2. Defining the global variable as type `std::unique_ptr<DelayManager>` and initialize it in `get_delay_us`. This works but it requires a lock to be thread-safe.
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
22 similar comments
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
|
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting |
Bumps datasets from 1.11.0 to 1.16.1.
Release notes
Sourced from datasets's releases.
... (truncated)
Commits
acca8f4Release: 1.16.15071785Fix wrongly converted assert (#3323)22ca8e9Fix importdatasetson python 3.10 (#3326)45be3adupdate conda dependencies (#3325)3bd3046docsd50f5f9Release: 1.16.06a7e87cUpdate URL of tatoeba subset of xtreme (#3321)a46d8f5Add IndoNLI dataset (#3307)4bc0202Add push_to_hub docs (#3319)56edb54Removing query params for dynamic URL caching (#3315)Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)