Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add setting to use 32x32 pixel detectors to speed things up #18

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

hugobuddel
Copy link
Contributor

This allows us to run the code in the CI, for example in ScopeSim_Data. However, this means that certaint traces fall outside the detector, which is currently broken but is fixed in AstarVienna/ScopeSim#407

So this PR should be merged only after AstarVienna/ScopeSim#407 is merged

Also this PR is built on top of #17, so it is probably better to merge that one first.

JenniferKarr and others added 5 commits April 24, 2024 11:16
…S,LM.

This resulted in the code running for an open filter, but producing the wrong band, but crashed when trying to apply a filter, as the wavelength coverage became zero.

Fixed by using the "mode" line in the recipes.yaml file to set the mode directly, and adding a -m --mode option to the arg parser for the raw_script.py command line module. We may want add some error trapping to catch inconsistent mode/tech keywords.
This allows us to run the code in the CI, for example in
ScopeSim_Data. However, this means that certaint traces fall
outside the detector, which is currently broken. This is fixed
in AstarVienna/ScopeSim#407
@hugobuddel hugobuddel requested a review from JenniferKarr April 27, 2024 12:46
@hugobuddel hugobuddel changed the title Draft: Add setting to use 32x32 pixel detectors to speed things up Add setting to use 32x32 pixel detectors to speed things up May 6, 2024
@hugobuddel
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll merge this, now we can run the simulations in the CI again

@hugobuddel hugobuddel merged commit b4c3a92 into main May 6, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants