Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Removing dithering - DO NOT MERGE #96

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Removing dithering - DO NOT MERGE #96

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wtgee
Copy link
Collaborator

@wtgee wtgee commented Nov 23, 2018

Dithering utils have been merged upstream.

Dependent on panoptes/POCS#735

@wtgee wtgee self-assigned this Nov 23, 2018
AnthonyHorton
AnthonyHorton approved these changes Nov 23, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@AnthonyHorton AnthonyHorton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good, once the upstream PR has been merged.

@wtgee
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wtgee commented Nov 23, 2018

Triple approval! :)

@bazkiaei
Copy link
Contributor

Triple approval! :)

This was the first time I approved a PR I think. 💃

@wtgee wtgee added the stale PRs that are stale label Oct 28, 2020
@wtgee
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wtgee commented Oct 28, 2020

Closing as this no longer appears relevant and generic dithering should be upstream at POCS.

@wtgee wtgee closed this Oct 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bazkiaei bazkiaei bazkiaei approved these changes

@AnthonyHorton AnthonyHorton AnthonyHorton approved these changes

@lspitler lspitler lspitler approved these changes

@JAAlvarado-Montes JAAlvarado-Montes Awaiting requested review from JAAlvarado-Montes

Assignees

@wtgee wtgee

Labels
stale PRs that are stale
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@wtgee @bazkiaei @lspitler @AnthonyHorton