Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(s3stream): atomic failover feature #899

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged

feat(s3stream): atomic failover feature #899

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

superhx
Copy link
Contributor

@superhx superhx commented Jan 18, 2024

No description provided.

@superhx superhx requested review from SCNieh and Chillax-0v0 January 18, 2024 07:34
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (315ec49) 54.98% compared to head (453753f) 55.01%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #899      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     54.98%   55.01%   +0.03%     
- Complexity     1243     1247       +4     
============================================
  Files           133      133              
  Lines          8534     8534              
  Branches        789      789              
============================================
+ Hits           4692     4695       +3     
  Misses         3425     3425              
+ Partials        417      414       -3     
Components Coverage Δ
RocketMQ Broker ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Common 5.80% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Controller 54.58% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Proxy 37.28% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
RocketMQ Store 73.65% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
RocketMQ Stream ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Metadata 35.44% <ø> (ø)

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@superhx superhx merged commit cf07ae3 into main Jan 18, 2024
7 checks passed
@superhx superhx deleted the feat_failover branch January 18, 2024 07:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants