Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: downgrade the source level of s3stream to java11 #901

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

daniel-y
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (4277d95) 55.00% compared to head (25690c3) 54.98%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #901      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     55.00%   54.98%   -0.03%     
+ Complexity     1245     1243       -2     
============================================
  Files           133      133              
  Lines          8534     8534              
  Branches        789      789              
============================================
- Hits           4694     4692       -2     
  Misses         3425     3425              
- Partials        415      417       +2     
Components Coverage Δ
RocketMQ Broker ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Common 5.80% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Controller 54.58% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Proxy 37.18% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️
RocketMQ Store 73.60% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Stream ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Metadata 35.44% <ø> (ø)

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@superhx superhx merged commit ffdc0de into main Jan 23, 2024
7 checks passed
@superhx superhx deleted the downgrade_11 branch January 23, 2024 10:11
lifepuzzlefun pushed a commit to lifepuzzlefun/automq-for-rocketmq that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants