Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(cache): add cache entry overhead to cache size #907

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

superhx
Copy link
Contributor

@superhx superhx commented Jan 30, 2024

No description provided.

@superhx superhx requested review from SCNieh and Chillax-0v0 January 30, 2024 08:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (178a58d) 55.92% compared to head (717c359) 55.94%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #907      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     55.92%   55.94%   +0.01%     
+ Complexity     1266     1264       -2     
============================================
  Files           133      133              
  Lines          8534     8534              
  Branches        789      789              
============================================
+ Hits           4773     4774       +1     
+ Misses         3327     3324       -3     
- Partials        434      436       +2     
Components Coverage Δ
RocketMQ Broker ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Common 5.80% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Controller 57.49% <ø> (+0.10%) ⬆️
RocketMQ Proxy 37.18% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️
RocketMQ Store 73.60% <ø> (ø)
RocketMQ Stream ∅ <ø> (∅)
RocketMQ Metadata 35.44% <ø> (ø)

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@superhx superhx force-pushed the feat_cache_overhead branch from 1c2cd83 to 717c359 Compare January 30, 2024 08:32
@superhx superhx merged commit dd39fbb into main Jan 30, 2024
7 checks passed
@superhx superhx deleted the feat_cache_overhead branch January 30, 2024 08:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants