- Default Scorecards Checks
- Detailed Check Documentation (Scoring Criteria, Risks, and Remediation)
- Code of Conduct
- Contribute to Scorecards
- Add a New Check
- Connect with the Scorecards Community
- Report a Security Issue
We created Scorecards to give consumers of open-source projects an easy way to judge whether their dependencies are safe.
Scorecards is an automated tool that assesses a number of important heuristics ("checks") associated with software security and assigns each check a score of 0-10. You can use these scores to understand specific areas to improve in order to strengthen the security posture of your project. You can also assess the risks that dependencies introduce, and make informed decisions about accepting these risks, evaluating alternative solutions, or working with the maintainers to make improvements.
The inspiration for Scorecards’ logo: "You passed! All D's ... and an A!"
-
Automate analysis and trust decisions on the security posture of open source projects.
-
Use this data to proactively improve the security posture of the critical projects the world depends on.
Platforms: Currently, Scorecards supports OSX and Linux platforms. If you are using a Windows OS you may experience issues. Contributions towards supporting Windows are welcome.
Language: You must have GoLang installed to run Scorecards (https://golang.org/doc/install)
Before running Scorecard, you need to either:
- create a GitHub access token
and set it in an environment variable called
GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN,GITHUB_TOKEN,GH_AUTH_TOKENorGH_TOKEN. This helps to avoid the GitHub's api rate limits with unauthenticated requests.
# For posix platforms, e.g. linux, mac:
export GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN=<your access token>
# Multiple tokens can be provided separated by comma to be utilized
# in a round robin fashion.
export GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN=<your access token1>,<your access token2>
# For windows:
set GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN=<your access token>
set GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN=<your access token1>,<your access token2>- create a GitHub App Installations for higher rate-limit quotas. If you have an installed GitHub App and key file, you can use the three environment variables below, following the commands shown above for your platform.
GITHUB_APP_KEY_PATH=<path to the key file on disk>
GITHUB_APP_INSTALLATION_ID=<installation id>
GITHUB_APP_ID=<app id>
These variables can be obtained from the GitHub developer settings page.
scorecard is available as a Docker container:
The GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN has to be set to a valid token
docker run -e GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN=token gcr.io/openssf/scorecard:stable --show-details --repo=https://github.com/ossf/scorecardScorecards can run using just one argument, the URL of the target repo:
$ go install github.com/ossf/scorecard/v2@latest
$ scorecard --repo=github.com/ossf-tests/scorecard-check-branch-protection-e2e
Starting [CII-Best-Practices]
Starting [Fuzzing]
Starting [Pinned-Dependencies]
Starting [CI-Tests]
Starting [Maintained]
Starting [Packaging]
Starting [SAST]
Starting [Dependency-Update-Tool]
Starting [Token-Permissions]
Starting [Security-Policy]
Starting [Signed-Releases]
Starting [Binary-Artifacts]
Starting [Branch-Protection]
Starting [Code-Review]
Starting [Contributors]
Starting [Vulnerabilities]
Finished [CI-Tests]
Finished [Maintained]
Finished [Packaging]
Finished [SAST]
Finished [Signed-Releases]
Finished [Binary-Artifacts]
Finished [Branch-Protection]
Finished [Code-Review]
Finished [Contributors]
Finished [Dependency-Update-Tool]
Finished [Token-Permissions]
Finished [Security-Policy]
Finished [Vulnerabilities]
Finished [CII-Best-Practices]
Finished [Fuzzing]
Finished [Pinned-Dependencies]
RESULTS
-------
Aggregate score: 7.9 / 10
Check scores:
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SCORE | NAME | REASON | DOCUMENTATION/REMEDIATION |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 10 / 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#binary-artifacts |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 9 / 10 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#branch-protection |
| | | maximal on development and all | |
| | | release branches | |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ? | CI-Tests | no pull request found | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#ci-tests |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 / 10 | CII-Best-Practices | no badge found | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#cii-best-practices |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 10 / 10 | Code-Review | branch protection for default | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#code-review |
| | | branch is enabled | |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 / 10 | Contributors | 0 different companies found -- | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#contributors |
| | | score normalized to 0 | |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 / 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#dependency-update-tool |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 / 10 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed in | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#fuzzing |
| | | OSS-Fuzz | |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1 / 10 | Maintained | 2 commit(s) found in the last | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#maintained |
| | | 90 days -- score normalized to | |
| | | 1 | |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ? | Packaging | no published package detected | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#packaging |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 8 / 10 | Pinned-Dependencies | unpinned dependencies detected | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#pinned-dependencies |
| | | -- score normalized to 8 | |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 / 10 | SAST | no SAST tool detected | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#sast |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 / 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file not | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#security-policy |
| | | detected | |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ? | Signed-Releases | no releases found | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#signed-releases |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 10 / 10 | Token-Permissions | tokens are read-only in GitHub | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#token-permissions |
| | | workflows | |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 10 / 10 | Vulnerabilities | no vulnerabilities detected | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#vulnerabilities |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|Each individual check returns a score of 0 to 10, with 10 representing the best possible score. Scorecards also produces an aggregate score, which is a weight-based average of the individual checks weighted by risk.
- “Critical” risk checks are weighted at 10
- “High” risk checks are weighted at 7.5
- “Medium” risk checks are weighted at 5
- “Low” risk checks are weighted at 2.5
Note: there are currently no Scorecards checks rated as “Critical” risk.
Tests that are rated as “High” risk are:
- Maintained
- Dependency-Update-Tool
- Binary-Artifacts
- Branch-Protection
- Code-Review
- Signed-Releases
- Token-Permissions
- Vulnerabilities
Tests that are rated as “Medium” risk are:
- Fuzzing
- Packaging
- Pinned-Dependencies
- SAST
- Security-Policy
Tests that are rated as “Low” risk are:
- CI-Tests
- CII-Best-Practices
- Contributors
For more details about why a check fails, use the --show-details option:
./scorecard --repo=github.com/ossf-tests/scorecard-check-branch-protection-e2e --checks Branch-Protection --show-details
Starting [Pinned-Dependencies]
Finished [Pinned-Dependencies]
RESULTS
-------
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SCORE | NAME | REASON | DETAILS | DOCUMENTATION/REMEDIATION |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 9 / 10 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not | Info: 'force pushes' disabled | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#branch-protection |
| | | maximal on development and all | on branch 'main' Info: 'allow | |
| | | release branches | deletion' disabled on branch | |
| | | | 'main' Info: linear history | |
| | | | enabled on branch 'main' Info: | |
| | | | strict status check enabled | |
| | | | on branch 'main' Warn: status | |
| | | | checks for merging have no | |
| | | | specific status to check on | |
| | | | branch 'main' Info: number | |
| | | | of required reviewers is 2 | |
| | | | on branch 'main' Info: Stale | |
| | | | review dismissal enabled on | |
| | | | branch 'main' Info: Owner | |
| | | | review required on branch | |
| | | | 'main' Info: 'admininistrator' | |
| | | | PRs need reviews before being | |
| | | | merged on branch 'main' | |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
For projects in the --npm, --pypi, or --rubygems ecosystems, you have the option to run Scorecards using a package manager. Provide the package name to run the checks on the corresponding GitHub source code.
For example, --npm=angular.
To run only specific check(s), add the --checks argument with a list of check
names.
For example, --checks=CI-Tests,Code-Review.
There are three formats currently: default, json, and csv. Others may be
added in the future.
These may be specified with the --format flag. For example, --format=json.
If you have what looks like a bug, please use the Github issue tracking system. Before you file an issue, please search existing issues to see if your issue is already covered.
If you're interested in seeing a list of projects with their Scorecard check results, we publish these results in a BigQuery public dataset.
This data is available in the public BigQuery dataset
openssf:scorecardcron.scorecard. The latest results are available in the
BigQuery view openssf:scorecardcron.scorecard_latest.
You can extract the latest results to Google Cloud storage in JSON format using
the bq tool:
# Get the latest PARTITION_ID
bq query --nouse_legacy_sql 'SELECT partition_id FROM
openssf.scorecardcron.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.PARTITIONS WHERE table_name="scorecard"
ORDER BY partition_id DESC
LIMIT 1'
# Extract to GCS
bq extract --destination_format=NEWLINE_DELIMITED_JSON
'openssf:scorecardcron.scorecard$<partition_id>' gs://bucket-name/filename.json
The list of projects that are checked is available in the
cron/data/projects.csv
file in this repository. If you would like us to track more, please feel free to
send a Pull Request with others. Currently, this list is derived from projects hosted on GitHub
ONLY. We do plan to expand them in near future to account for projects hosted
on other source control systems.
NOTE: The public dataset uses a Pass/Fail scoring system with a confidence score between 0 and 10. A confidence of 0 indicates that the check was unable to achieve any real signal, and that the result should be ignored. A confidence of 10 indicates the check was completely sure of the result.
The following checks are all run against the target project by default:
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | Is the project free of checked-in binaries? |
| Branch-Protection | Does the project use Branch Protection ? |
| CI-Tests | Does the project run tests in CI, e.g. GitHub Actions, Prow? |
| CII-Best-Practices | Does the project have a CII Best Practices Badge? |
| Code-Review | Does the project require code review before code is merged? |
| Contributors | Does the project have contributors from at least two different organizations? |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | Does the project use tools to help update its dependencies? |
| Fuzzing | Does the project use fuzzing tools, e.g. OSS-Fuzz? |
| Maintained | Is the project maintained? |
| Pinned-Dependencies | Does the project declare and pin dependencies? |
| Packaging | Does the project build and publish official packages from CI/CD, e.g. GitHub Publishing ? |
| SAST | Does the project use static code analysis tools, e.g. CodeQL, SonarCloud? |
| Security-Policy | Does the project contain a security policy? |
| Signed-Releases | Does the project cryptographically sign releases? |
| Token-Permissions | Does the project declare GitHub workflow tokens as read only? |
| Vulnerabilities | Does the project have unfixed vulnerabilities? Uses the OSV service. |
To see detailed information about each check, its scoring criteria, and remediation steps, check out the checks documentation page.
Before contributing, please follow our Code of Conduct.
See the Contributing documentation for guidance on how to contribute to the project.
If you'd like to add a check, please see guidance here.
If you want to get involved in the Scorecards community or have ideas you'd like to chat about, we discuss this project in the OSSF Best Practices Working Group meetings.
See the Community Calendar for the schedule and meeting invitations. The meetings happen biweekly https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=s63voefhp5i9pfltb5q67ngpes%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America%2FLos_Angeles
For realtime discussion, you can join the #security_scorecards slack channel. Slack requires registration, but the openssf team is open invitation to anyone to register here. Feel free to come and ask any questions.
To report a security issue, please follow instructions here.