-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(skip_index): possibility added to skip index actions #942
Conversation
Hi @jorma16 , |
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. |
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. |
Hi! I couldn't check this PR until today, sorry for the delay. I have added the tests that you requested, thanks in advance! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your contribution!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's ok for me.
Just added the possibility to avoid index operations in init, like someone ask here: #924
And other people workaround here: #608
Please, take care of this, I really need this and I think that is very interesting for read only applications.