Adding the metadata for a DefinedTerm Profile

[sneumann]

Hi,
I have read https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/blob/master/.github/readme.md
and this PR is to "For new profiles: steps 1..4".
Please double check the line that does not start with a dash, whether I understood things correctly:
DefinedTerm,,,schema:DefinedTerm,
The corresponding ./specifications/DefinedTerm/jsonld/DefinedTerm_v0.1-DRAFT.jsonld
is sitting in PR https://github.com/sneumann/specifications/pull/new/fix/issue652
Yours,
Steffen
P.S.: this could actually be a PR better suitable for schema.science, since there is nothing bio in it ...
but schemas.science does not yet have all the github action magic.

[sneumann]

Hi, I think we are not entirely there yet, and I need help what to do:

1. we now have https://github.com/BioSchemas/specifications/tree/master/DefinedTerm merged into the specifications.
2. There is no https://bioschemas.org/profiles/DefinedTerm/ yet
3. I thought this happens through this Adding the metadata for a DefinedTerm Profile #799 here (Defined terms #801 was not merged as it duplicates Adding the metadata for a DefinedTerm Profile #799)
   => What do I have to do ?
   I did notice that
   

   bioschemas.github.io/_data/profile_versions.yaml

   Line 54 in 9ad9d4f

   latest_publication: 0.1 -DRAFT

   
   might contain an extra space (sorry, my bad!)
   and the rendered CSV https://github.com/BioSchemas/bioschemas.github.io/blob/master/_data/metadata_mapping.csv
   does look broken :-(
   Yours, Steffen

[gtsueng]

@sneumann
The space was corrected in this pull request which contains the autogenerated profile

The reviewer requested the following which is why it hasn't been merged yet:

The profile created from GitHub actions looks fine (after updating hierarchy and redirections which do not work well in GitHub actions). However, some information is missing and should be added to this PR.
@sneumann @gtsueng @ivanmicetic could you please add the use cases? They should go to /useCases/DefinedTerm and also the group this profile should go to? I would suggest Dataset.
There are no embedded examples in the page, cannot those be created with DDE as well? If not, see if you can add a couple by hand. Not mandatory/blocking but nice to have.

How to help. For the branch referenced in this pull request:

1. Add a DefinedTerm.md page to this directory with the use case: https://github.com/BioSchemas/bioschemas.github.io/tree/2023_12_21-18_29/pages/_useCases
2. Add examples to the page manually as this is not supported by the DDE

[sneumann]

Ok, I have started the UseCases in https://github.com/sneumann/bioschemas.github.io/blob/2023_12_21-18_29-sneumann/pages/_useCases/DefinedTerm.md,
because I don't know how to augment the PR #806 and will create a new PR later, or someone merges my addition from my branch into #806 once ready.

"Add examples to the page manually" means ignoring

bioschemas.github.io/pages/_profiles/DefinedTerm/0.1-DRAFT.html

Line 6 in ec0111d

# DO NOT MANUALLY EDIT THE CONTENT

and creating snippets like
https://github.com/sneumann/bioschemas.github.io/blob/0f56835d50154e689ad873a6ad0161b7620f92c6/pages/_profiles/Dataset/1.0-RELEASE.html#L46
in https://github.com/sneumann/bioschemas.github.io/blob/0f56835d50154e689ad873a6ad0161b7620f92c6/pages/_profiles/DefinedTerm/0.1-DRAFT.html#L22
Correct ?

[gtsueng]

@sneumann that is correct