Skip to content

feat(sdk-coin-ton): add jetton skeleton #6618

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

Chinmay-Sharma1
Copy link
Contributor

Ticket: WIN-3198

TICKET: WIN-3198

@Chinmay-Sharma1 Chinmay-Sharma1 force-pushed the WIN-3198 branch 2 times, most recently from 5b07d70 to a17ad7e Compare August 4, 2025 17:53
@@ -630,6 +634,17 @@ export class Nep141Token extends AccountCoinToken {
}
}

export class JettonToken extends AccountCoinToken {
public contractAddress: string;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please check whether contractAddress is the terminology used in Ton?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't use contractAddress in ton, We use Jetton Master contract. I will replace the contractAddress with the Jetton master.

import { Transaction } from './lib';
import { Ton } from './ton';

export class JettonToken extends Ton {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we name it JettonToken or TonToken?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think TonToken would be the appropriate name, I will make the necessary changes, thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants