-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JNG-5504 modelled table actions #435
Conversation
noherczeg
commented
Jul 5, 2024
•
edited by github-actions
bot
Loading
edited by github-actions
bot
JNG-5504 Implement in UI + transformations |
WalkthroughThe changes span across multiple files focusing on enhancing import handling, modifying logic for action definitions, and incorporating new features for UI elements such as confirmation dialogs and input form call operations. Methods were added to manage new conditions and workflows, improvements were made for error handling and bulk operations, and new comments for documentation purposes. Additionally, updates were made to test scripts and action templates. Changes
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 8
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/PreFetchAction.fragment.hbs (1)
Line range hint
2-5
:
Consider adding error handling for the data fetching call.Currently, there is no error handling for the data fetching call. This can lead to unhandled exceptions if the fetch operation fails.
const {{ simpleActionDefinitionName action.actionDefinition }} = async (): Promise<JudoRestResponse<{{ classDataName action.actionDefinition.targetType 'Stored' }} | null>> => { - return {{ getServiceImplForPage page }}.get{{ firstToUpper action.targetDataElement.name }}({{# if (pageHasSignedId page) }}{{# if page.openInDialog }}data{{ else }}{ __signedIdentifier: signedIdentifier } as any{{/ if }}{{ else }}data{{/ if }}, { + try { + return await {{ getServiceImplForPage page }}.get{{ firstToUpper action.targetDataElement.name }}({{# if (pageHasSignedId page) }}{{# if page.openInDialog }}data{{ else }}{ __signedIdentifier: signedIdentifier } as any{{/ if }}{{ else }}data{{/ if }}, { _mask: '{}', + }); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error during data fetch:', error); + // Handle the error appropriately + return null; + } };judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/BulkRemoveAction.fragment.hbs (1)
Line range hint
2-29
:
LGTM! Consider refactoring for better readability.The changes to the
selectedRows
parameter type are correct. However, the nested conditionals and complex logic could benefit from some refactoring for better readability and maintainability.Consider breaking down the nested conditionals into smaller helper functions to improve readability.
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/RefreshAction.fragment.hbs (1)
Line range hint
2-64
:
LGTM! Consider refactoring for better readability.The changes to the
queryCustomizer
parameter type are correct. However, the nested conditionals and complex logic could benefit from some refactoring for better readability and maintainability.Consider breaking down the nested conditionals into smaller helper functions to improve readability.
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/OpenPageAction.fragment.hbs (1)
Line range hint
2-60
:
LGTM! Consider refactoring for better readability.The changes to the
target
parameter type are correct. However, the nested conditionals and complex logic could benefit from some refactoring for better readability and maintainability.Consider breaking down the nested conditionals into smaller helper functions to improve readability.
judo-ui-react/src/main/java/hu/blackbelt/judo/ui/generator/react/UiI18NHelper.java (1)
140-140
: Remove unnecessary blank line.The added blank line is not required and can be removed to keep the code clean.