-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JNG-5977 singleton access export #471
Conversation
noherczeg
commented
Oct 16, 2024
•
edited by github-actions
bot
Loading
edited by github-actions
bot
JNG-5977 Frontend react build fail when the relation has export on Single Access Page |
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/ExportAction.fragment.hbs (1)
Line range hint
1-24
: Summary of changes and potential impactThe changes in this file standardize the use of
owner.current
in export method calls across different contexts (relation selectors and other cases). While this standardization can improve consistency, it may also change the behavior of the export functionality in subtle ways.Key points to consider:
- The export method now always receives a non-undefined first argument, which could affect how the export is performed.
- The dynamic generation of export method names remains unchanged, which should be verified for consistency with the new parameter passing approach.
- The use of type assertions (
as any
) in some cases may reduce type safety.To ensure these changes are robust and maintainable:
- Consider creating a dedicated export utility function that encapsulates the logic for different export scenarios. This could improve maintainability and reduce the risk of inconsistencies.
- Review the error handling to ensure it adequately covers potential issues that may arise from the new parameter passing approach.
- If possible, replace the
as any
type assertion with a properly typed interface to maintain type safety throughout the codebase.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/ExportAction.fragment.hbs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/ExportAction.fragment.hbs (2)
10-10
: Verify the impact of usingowner.current
in the export method call.The export method is now consistently using
owner.current
as its first argument. This change could affect the export behavior, especially if the previous implementation relied onundefined
being passed in some cases.Please confirm that this change is intentional and aligns with the expected behavior of the export functionality in the context of relation selectors.
To verify the impact, you may want to run the following script:
This will help identify if this change is consistent across all relation selector export implementations.
✅ Verification successful
The change to use
owner.current
in the export method call is consistent across the codebase and does not impact other components.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of the export method call in relation selectors # Search for export method calls in relation selectors rg --type hbs -e 'isRelationSelector.*export' -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 222432
12-12
: Review type safety and verify consistency of export method calls.The export method call has been updated to use
owner.current
whenpageHasSignedId(page)
is false, which aligns with the changes in the relation selector case. However, there are two points that require attention:
The use of
as any
type assertion for the signed identifier object may compromise type safety. Consider defining a proper interface for this object to maintain type checking.The dynamic generation of the export method name based on
action.targetDataElement
remains unchanged. Ensure that this logic is still correct and consistent with the updated parameter passing.To verify the consistency of these changes across the codebase, run the following script:
This will help identify if the changes are consistently applied across all export method calls and if the
pageHasSignedId
check is used consistently.✅ Verification successful
Review: Type assertions are consistent but warrant careful consideration
The use of
as any
type assertions, including the one in theExportAction.fragment.hbs
file, is consistent across the codebase. This pattern is frequently employed, especially when dealing withsignedIdentifier
and in similar contexts.While type assertions can indeed compromise type safety, their widespread and consistent use suggests an intentional design decision, possibly to handle dynamic data or work around TypeScript limitations in certain scenarios.
However, it's important to note that relying on type assertions can mask potential type-related issues and make the code more prone to runtime errors. Consider the following recommendations:
- Review the necessity of each
as any
assertion and explore if there are type-safe alternatives.- If the assertions are unavoidable, document the reasons for their use and any associated risks.
- Consider creating a custom type or interface for the
signedIdentifier
object to improve type safety and code clarity.- Implement thorough testing to catch any potential runtime errors that might be masked by these type assertions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of the export method call and its variations # Search for export method calls rg --type hbs -e 'export.*\(.*\)' -A 5 -B 5 # Search for uses of pageHasSignedId rg --type hbs -e 'pageHasSignedId' -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 222432
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all instances of 'as any' type assertions to identify potential type safety concerns # Search for 'as any' type assertions in Handlebars templates and TypeScript files rg --type tsx -e '\bas\s+any\b' -A 2 -B 2 rg --type ts -e '\bas\s+any\b' -A 2 -B 2 rg --type hbs -e '\bas\s+any\b' -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 18737