Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JNG-5977 singleton access export #471

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

noherczeg
Copy link
Contributor

@noherczeg noherczeg commented Oct 16, 2024

BugJNG-5977 Frontend react build fail when the relation has export on Single Access Page

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the ExportAction.fragment.hbs file, specifically updating the logic of an asynchronous function that manages export actions. The function's signature remains unchanged, but the parameters passed to the export method have been adjusted based on the presence of action.targetDataElement. The first argument for the export method is now consistently set to owner.current, regardless of the conditional branch, which may affect the export functionality's behavior.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/ExportAction.fragment.hbs Updated the logic of an asynchronous function to consistently use owner.current as the first argument for the export method based on the presence of action.targetDataElement.

Poem

In the code where exports play,
A rabbit hops and finds the way.
With owner.current in the lead,
The exports flow, fulfilling need.
Hooray for changes, swift and bright,
Our data dances in the light! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/ExportAction.fragment.hbs (1)

Line range hint 1-24: Summary of changes and potential impact

The changes in this file standardize the use of owner.current in export method calls across different contexts (relation selectors and other cases). While this standardization can improve consistency, it may also change the behavior of the export functionality in subtle ways.

Key points to consider:

  1. The export method now always receives a non-undefined first argument, which could affect how the export is performed.
  2. The dynamic generation of export method names remains unchanged, which should be verified for consistency with the new parameter passing approach.
  3. The use of type assertions (as any) in some cases may reduce type safety.

To ensure these changes are robust and maintainable:

  1. Consider creating a dedicated export utility function that encapsulates the logic for different export scenarios. This could improve maintainability and reduce the risk of inconsistencies.
  2. Review the error handling to ensure it adequately covers potential issues that may arise from the new parameter passing approach.
  3. If possible, replace the as any type assertion with a properly typed interface to maintain type safety throughout the codebase.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9884c1e and 7d99b67.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/ExportAction.fragment.hbs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/pages/actions/ExportAction.fragment.hbs (2)

10-10: Verify the impact of using owner.current in the export method call.

The export method is now consistently using owner.current as its first argument. This change could affect the export behavior, especially if the previous implementation relied on undefined being passed in some cases.

Please confirm that this change is intentional and aligns with the expected behavior of the export functionality in the context of relation selectors.

To verify the impact, you may want to run the following script:

This will help identify if this change is consistent across all relation selector export implementations.

✅ Verification successful

The change to use owner.current in the export method call is consistent across the codebase and does not impact other components.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of the export method call in relation selectors

# Search for export method calls in relation selectors
rg --type hbs -e 'isRelationSelector.*export' -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 222432


12-12: Review type safety and verify consistency of export method calls.

The export method call has been updated to use owner.current when pageHasSignedId(page) is false, which aligns with the changes in the relation selector case. However, there are two points that require attention:

  1. The use of as any type assertion for the signed identifier object may compromise type safety. Consider defining a proper interface for this object to maintain type checking.

  2. The dynamic generation of the export method name based on action.targetDataElement remains unchanged. Ensure that this logic is still correct and consistent with the updated parameter passing.

To verify the consistency of these changes across the codebase, run the following script:

This will help identify if the changes are consistently applied across all export method calls and if the pageHasSignedId check is used consistently.

✅ Verification successful

Review: Type assertions are consistent but warrant careful consideration

The use of as any type assertions, including the one in the ExportAction.fragment.hbs file, is consistent across the codebase. This pattern is frequently employed, especially when dealing with signedIdentifier and in similar contexts.

While type assertions can indeed compromise type safety, their widespread and consistent use suggests an intentional design decision, possibly to handle dynamic data or work around TypeScript limitations in certain scenarios.

However, it's important to note that relying on type assertions can mask potential type-related issues and make the code more prone to runtime errors. Consider the following recommendations:

  1. Review the necessity of each as any assertion and explore if there are type-safe alternatives.
  2. If the assertions are unavoidable, document the reasons for their use and any associated risks.
  3. Consider creating a custom type or interface for the signedIdentifier object to improve type safety and code clarity.
  4. Implement thorough testing to catch any potential runtime errors that might be masked by these type assertions.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of the export method call and its variations

# Search for export method calls
rg --type hbs -e 'export.*\(.*\)' -A 5 -B 5

# Search for uses of pageHasSignedId
rg --type hbs -e 'pageHasSignedId' -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 222432


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all instances of 'as any' type assertions to identify potential type safety concerns

# Search for 'as any' type assertions in Handlebars templates and TypeScript files
rg --type tsx -e '\bas\s+any\b' -A 2 -B 2
rg --type ts -e '\bas\s+any\b' -A 2 -B 2
rg --type hbs -e '\bas\s+any\b' -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 18737

@noherczeg noherczeg merged commit 66742bf into develop Oct 16, 2024
3 checks passed
@noherczeg noherczeg deleted the bugfix/JNG-5977-singleton-access-export branch October 16, 2024 11:57
noherczeg added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants