-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JNG-6102 React 19 #504
JNG-6102 React 19 #504
Conversation
noherczeg
commented
Jan 10, 2025
•
edited by github-actions
bot
Loading
edited by github-actions
bot
JNG-6102 Upgrade to React 19 |
WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses a comprehensive update across multiple files in a React project, focusing on dependency upgrades, type assertions, and minor component refactoring. The changes include updating package dependencies to newer versions, modifying type handling in table components, simplifying the drawer header component, and configuring the Vite build process with a new React compiler plugin. The modifications aim to improve type safety, update library versions, and potentially enhance React component compilation. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/layout/Drawer/DrawerHeader.tsx.hbs (1)
Line range hint
22-37
: Consider extracting complex sx stylesWhile the transition to using the
sx
prop is good, the complex conditional styling could be more maintainable if extracted into a separate constant or helper function.Consider refactoring like this:
const getDrawerHeaderStyles = (theme: Theme, open: boolean, isHorizontal: boolean) => ({ ...theme.mixins.toolbar, display: 'flex', alignItems: 'center', justifyContent: open ? 'flex-start' : 'center', minHeight: isHorizontal ? 'unset' : '60px', width: isHorizontal ? { xs: '100%', lg: '424px' } : 'inherit', paddingTop: isHorizontal ? { xs: '10px', lg: '0' } : '8px', paddingBottom: isHorizontal ? { xs: '18px', lg: '0' } : '8px', paddingLeft: isHorizontal ? { xs: '24px', lg: '0' } : open ? '24px' : 0, paddingRight: isHorizontal ? { xs: '24px', lg: '0' } : open ? '24px' : 0, }); // Usage in component: <Box sx={getDrawerHeaderStyles(theme, open, isHorizontal)}>This would improve readability and make the styles more reusable if needed.
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/vite.config.ts.hbs (1)
Line range hint
13-28
: Review chunk splitting strategyThe manual chunk configuration looks good but consider:
- Impact on initial load time
- Cache invalidation strategy
- Common dependencies across chunks
Consider analyzing bundle sizes after the React 19 and MUI 6 upgrades to optimize the splitting strategy.
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/components/table/EagerTable.tsx.hbs (1)
Line range hint
288-292
: Consider using a type-safe approach for apiRef casting.The current type assertion (
apiRef as unknown as any
) bypasses TypeScript's type checking. While this works, it might hide potential type-related issues.Consider:
- Using proper types from
@mui/x-data-grid-pro
- Creating a type-safe wrapper for the grid API
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/components/table/LazyTable.tsx.hbs (1)
Line range hint
319-324
: Maintain consistency with EagerTable implementation.The changes in LazyTable mirror those in EagerTable, which is good for consistency. However, both components could benefit from a more type-safe approach to API reference handling.
Consider extracting the common table functionality into a shared hook or utility to reduce code duplication and ensure consistent behavior.
Also applies to: 632-639
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
judo-ui-react-itest/ActionGroupTestPro/action_group_test_pro__god/src/test/resources/snapshots/frontend-react/src/components/table/EagerTable.tsx.snapshot
(3 hunks)judo-ui-react-itest/ActionGroupTestPro/action_group_test_pro__god/src/test/resources/snapshots/frontend-react/src/components/table/LazyTable.tsx.snapshot
(3 hunks)judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/package.json.dependencies.fragment.hbs
(1 hunks)judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/package.json.dev-dependencies.fragment.hbs
(1 hunks)judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/components/table/EagerTable.tsx.hbs
(3 hunks)judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/components/table/LazyTable.tsx.hbs
(3 hunks)judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/layout/Drawer/DrawerHeader.tsx.hbs
(3 hunks)judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/main.tsx.hbs
(1 hunks)judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/vite.config.ts.hbs
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- judo-ui-react-itest/ActionGroupTestPro/action_group_test_pro__god/src/test/resources/snapshots/frontend-react/src/components/table/LazyTable.tsx.snapshot
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: ⏳ Build, test and deploy artifacts
🔇 Additional comments (13)
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/layout/Drawer/DrawerHeader.tsx.hbs (3)
4-7
: LGTM! Clean import organizationThe import restructuring aligns well with the removal of styled-components, maintaining a clean and organized import structure.
Line range hint
13-21
: LGTM! Component logic is well-structuredThe component maintains clean hook usage and proper conditional logic for layout handling.
Line range hint
1-39
: Verify MUI component compatibility with React 19While the component looks compatible with React 19, we should verify the compatibility of the used MUI components.
✅ Verification successful
MUI components are compatible with React 19
The used MUI components (Box, useTheme, useMediaQuery) are from MUI v6.3.1, which is specifically designed for React 19 compatibility. All previously reported React 19 compatibility issues have been resolved in the current version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check package.json for MUI versions and any React 19 compatibility notes rg -A 5 '"@mui/material":\s*"[^"]*"' package.json rg -A 5 '"react":\s*"[^"]*"' package.json # Check for any React 19 related issues in MUI's issue tracker gh api graphql -f query=' { search(query: "repo:mui/material-ui react 19 compatibility", type: ISSUE, first: 5) { nodes { ... on Issue { title url state } } } } 'Length of output: 873
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find package.json files fd package.json # Once found, check their content for MUI and React versions fd package.json --exec cat {} \;Length of output: 2954
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/package.json.dependencies.fragment.hbs (4)
5-13
: Review MUI v6 beta compatibilityThe upgrade to MUI v6 beta versions (@mui/lab beta.22, @mui/material 6.3.1) includes breaking changes:
- New styling system
- Component API changes
- Theme structure updates
Consider:
- Deferring the MUI v6 upgrade until stable release
- Creating a comprehensive migration plan
- Adding detailed testing for MUI components
1-35
: Verify peer dependency compatibilityMultiple major version updates (React 19, MUI 6, React Router 7) require careful verification of peer dependency compatibility.
Run this script to check for potential peer dependency conflicts:
✅ Verification successful
Peer dependencies are compatible ✓
All major version updates (React 19, MUI 6, React Router 7) have compatible peer dependency requirements. No conflicts detected in the dependency chain.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract peer dependency requirements for pkg in @mui/material @mui/lab react-router-dom react-oidc-context react-hotkeys-hook do echo "Checking $pkg..." curl -s "https://registry.npmjs.org/$pkg/latest" | jq '.peerDependencies' doneLength of output: 1871
25-25
: Verify React 19 compatibility with existing codebaseReact 19.0.0 is a major version upgrade that introduces breaking changes. Key areas to verify:
- Use of deprecated lifecycle methods
- Changes in event handling
- Effects cleanup
- Automatic batching behavior
Run this script to identify potential compatibility issues:
Also applies to: 27-27
✅ Verification successful
React 19 upgrade appears safe to proceed
The codebase follows modern React patterns and best practices:
- Uses createRoot API
- Implements StrictMode
- Has proper error boundaries and Suspense
- No deprecated lifecycle methods found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for deprecated React patterns and lifecycle methods ast-grep --pattern 'componentWillMount|componentWillReceiveProps|componentWillUpdate' # Check for common React patterns that might need updates rg -l 'useEffect|useState|createRef|forwardRef'Length of output: 7293
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for React 19 specific patterns and features echo "=== Checking for Strict Mode usage ===" rg -l "StrictMode" echo -e "\n=== Checking for Suspense and Error Boundary usage ===" rg -l "Suspense|ErrorBoundary" echo -e "\n=== Checking for concurrent mode features ===" rg -l "useTransition|useDeferredValue|startTransition" echo -e "\n=== Checking for root creation pattern ===" rg -A 5 "createRoot|render" "src/index|src/main"Length of output: 3468
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check root creation pattern with correct path echo "=== Checking root creation in main.tsx ===" rg -A 5 "createRoot|render" "judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/main.tsx.hbs" echo -e "\n=== Checking React.lazy usage ===" rg "React\.lazy" "judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/"Length of output: 1029
33-34
: Verify React Router v7 migration requirementsReact Router v7 introduces breaking changes in routing behavior and APIs.
Run this script to identify potential migration needs:
✅ Verification successful
React Router v7 migration verification completed
The codebase already follows modern React Router patterns that are compatible with v7. The current implementation uses createHashRouter, RouterProvider, and the useNavigate hook in a way that aligns with v7's requirements. No deprecated v6 patterns that would break in v7 were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for React Router v6 patterns that need updates rg -l 'useNavigate|useLocation|useParams|Routes|Route'Length of output: 2545
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Route and Routes component usage patterns echo "=== Checking Route configurations ===" rg -A 2 '<Route' --type tsx echo -e "\n=== Checking useNavigate usage ===" rg -A 2 'useNavigate' --type tsx echo -e "\n=== Checking navigation calls ===" rg -A 2 'navigate\(' --type tsxLength of output: 433
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Route configurations and navigation patterns echo "=== Checking Route element prop usage ===" rg -A 2 '<Route.*element=' echo -e "\n=== Checking useNavigate and navigation patterns ===" rg -A 2 'useNavigate|navigate\(' echo -e "\n=== Checking other v6 specific patterns ===" rg -A 2 'createBrowserRouter|RouterProvider|loader:|action:'Length of output: 51739
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/package.json.dev-dependencies.fragment.hbs (2)
9-9
: Review stability of babel-plugin-react-compiler betaUsing a beta version of babel-plugin-react-compiler in production may lead to instability.
Consider:
- Checking the plugin's GitHub issues for known problems
- Testing the build process thoroughly
- Having a rollback plan
11-12
: Verify Vite 6 and Vitest compatibilityMajor version upgrades of build tools require careful verification:
- Vite 6.0.7 (major upgrade)
- Vitest 2.1.8 (major upgrade)
Run this script to check for potential build configuration issues:
✅ Verification successful
Vite 6 and Vitest 2 upgrade appears safe
The codebase uses standard, stable APIs that are compatible with both Vite 6 and Vitest 2. No deprecated features or breaking changes were found in the configuration or test files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Vite-specific configuration rg -l 'defineConfig|loadEnv|createServer|build.rollupOptions'Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Vite config content cat judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/vite.config.ts.hbs # Search for Vitest configuration and test files rg -l "vitest" --type ts --type jsLength of output: 1356
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of a test file for Vitest patterns cat "judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/utilities/table.test.ts" # Look for Vitest config files fd -e ts -e js vitest.configLength of output: 3699
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/vite.config.ts.hbs (1)
29-35
: Verify React compiler plugin configurationThe babel-plugin-react-compiler configuration needs verification:
- Empty options object might need configuration
- Plugin order might affect compilation
Consider documenting the compiler plugin's purpose and configuration options.
judo-ui-react/src/main/resources/actor/src/components/table/EagerTable.tsx.hbs (1)
476-485
: Verify the overflow style change impact.The overflow property has been moved from a comment to an active style. Ensure this doesn't affect table behavior in different scenarios.
judo-ui-react-itest/ActionGroupTestPro/action_group_test_pro__god/src/test/resources/snapshots/frontend-react/src/components/table/EagerTable.tsx.snapshot (2)
295-295
: Review type assertions carefullyThe type assertions
apiRef as unknown as any
bypass TypeScript's type checking system. While this might be necessary for compatibility with the MUI Data Grid API, it could mask potential type-related issues.Let's verify if there's a better way to type this:
Also applies to: 480-480
✅ Verification successful
Type assertions are consistently implemented
The
apiRef as unknown as any
type assertions are used consistently across both EagerTable and LazyTable components, appearing in both source templates and snapshots. This pattern appears to be an intentional design choice for handling MUI DataGrid's API compatibility.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of gridColumnDefinitionsSelector to see if there's a better typing pattern ast-grep --pattern 'gridColumnDefinitionsSelector($_)' # Search for other apiRef type assertions to ensure consistency rg 'apiRef as unknown as any'Length of output: 1592
485-485
: Verify overflow behavior impactSetting
overflow: 'hidden'
on the grid could affect how content is displayed in cells, especially with dynamic content or when using features like cell editing or tooltips.Let's check for potential overflow-related issues:
✅ Verification successful
Overflow style is correctly implemented
The
overflow: 'hidden'
on the grid container is a standard practice for CSS Grid layouts and is consistently implemented across both EagerTable and LazyTable components. This style ensures proper grid boundaries without affecting individual cell content behavior.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for related overflow styles or issues rg -A 2 'overflow:.*hidden' # Look for any existing overflow-related comments or issues rg -i 'overflow|scroll'Length of output: 18402