Updating input field length on Custom Query page #282
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Nice! Is there a next size up? |
yes, next one jumps from 240 to 320. it's no trouble at all to create a custom width if we want one in that range.
|
|
320px looks good! Let's go with that. Thanks for jumping on this, @robertandremitchell ! |
robertandremitchell
requested review from
nickclyde,
katyasoup,
fzhao99 and
bamader
…ttps://github.com/CDCgov/dibbs-query-connector into rob/280-elongate-the-input-field-for-the-query-name
nickclyde
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2025
robertandremitchell
deleted the
rob/280-elongate-the-input-field-for-the-query-name
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PULL REQUEST
Summary
Making the width of the input longer.
Current:
New:
Width updated from
maxw-mobiletowidth-card-lgwith the out-the-box uswds widths. We can do a custom width, but figured it made sense to stick with the out-the-box where possible.Related Issue
Fixes #280
Additional Information
Anything else the review team should know?
Checklist