Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specify rate functions in input.json #62

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ChiragKumar9
Copy link
Collaborator

WIP

@@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ use std::path::PathBuf;
use ixa::{define_global_property, ContextGlobalPropertiesExt, IxaError};
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};

#[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq)]
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@k88hudson-cfa what do you think of this approach for specifying in different rate functions?

/// Instantiate the rate functions specified in the global parameter `rate_of_infection` as actual
/// rate functions for the simulation that are assigned randomly to agents when they are infected.
pub fn instantiate_rate_fns(context: &mut Context) -> Result<(), IxaError> {
let rate_of_infection = context.get_params().rate_of_infection.clone();
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really don't love that this structure basically duplicates the info in rate_of_infection. I think there are two potential solutions: (a) implement InfectiousnessRateFn on enum Rates instead, or (b) actually move the info in rate_of_infection rather than copying it. I don't think (a) is a possible option because in implementing the methods for InfectiousnessRateFn on EmpiricalRate, you need to create new vectors that you store in the initialization process, and I don't see a way to do this if we just implement the method on the type as it is fed in from deserialization. I think (b) is an easy option, but I am open to other thoughts and ways of thinking about this.

I think we have to move the info (at least) because in EmpiricalRate we want to create

Rates::Constant(rate) => Box::new(ConstantRate::new(rate, infection_duration)?),
Rates::Empirical(rate_fn) => {
let (t, r): (Vec<f64>, Vec<f64>) = rate_fn.into_iter().unzip();
Box::new(EmpiricalRate::new(t, r)?)
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, doesn't using Box create an overhead here/should we be concerned about that? I could imagine us having a number of infectiousness curves on the order of the number of agents in the simulation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant