Update logs for alerting

[laurenkrugen-navapbc]

🎫 Ticket

n/a

🛠 Changes

Added back in logs that we use for informational alerting when credentials are revoked, reset, or registered.

ℹ️ Context for reviewers

As part of this PR, the logging that is used for credentials are revoked, reset, or registered changed, which stopped the alerts from firing. They have been added back in along with an inline comment.

Previous log statements can be found in this file on from an earlier commit: https://github.com/CMSgov/bcda-ssas-app/blob/55915297a5f690b434a3c5a32f575bd460ab193a/ssas/systems.go

✅ Acceptance Validation

tbd

🔒 Security Implications

• This PR adds a new software dependency or dependencies.
• This PR modifies or invalidates one or more of our security controls.
• This PR stores or transmits data that was not stored or transmitted before.
• This PR requires additional review of its security implications for other reasons.

If any security implications apply, add Jason Ashbaugh (GitHub username: StewGoin) as a reviewer and do not merge this PR without his approval.

[carlpartridge]

@laurenkrugen-navapbc Would these changes still be useful? The new logged data fields arent secrets or anything right? Curious how often these logs are used as well as more generally the ssas logs. Would it be helpful to add a common request identifier that could be used to tie the entire request into one easy to parse set of logs?

[laurenkrugen-navapbc]

@laurenkrugen-navapbc Would these changes still be useful? The new logged data fields arent secrets or anything right? Curious how often these logs are used as well as more generally the ssas logs. Would it be helpful to add a common request identifier that could be used to tie the entire request into one easy to parse set of logs?

I believe these would! I need to re-review these changes. The logged fields don't contain any sensitive data.

We have been working to introduce a common identifier for logs -- I will send you the docs on those! SSAS doesn't contain the identifier in as many places as the API and we still need to make some updates to clean things up in both.

[bhagatparwinder]

LGTM, good to merge?

[bhagatparwinder]

@laurenkrugen-navapbc @carlpartridge Would we like to merge this?