Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[refactor] combine checkInputs/Outputs and use for(M) #42
[refactor] combine checkInputs/Outputs and use for(M) #42
Changes from 6 commits
2ac5324
da96cd8
d517050
744e714
400918c
125355a
4d64d34
fe02c55
d3e662a
e2f7c5b
783557f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Type signature here is
if you really want it (!)...perhaps with a
type TypedPort e m = (NamedPort e, BinderType m)
??There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This might be better called
zipSuffixes
orzipWithSuffixes
, thoughThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Of course if we got rid of the extensive existing type signatures for
checkInputs
andcheckOutputs
then the line count here would look much better ;-). (Each ofcheckInputs
andcheckOutputs
is used twice though so I don't think inlining is a good idea)