Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Re-work Obelisk to allow for easier integration with non-obelisk messages #113

Closed
Zolkin1 opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #121
Closed

Re-work Obelisk to allow for easier integration with non-obelisk messages #113

Zolkin1 opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #121
Labels
enhancement New feature or request high priority This issue is on the top of the todo list

Comments

@Zolkin1
Copy link
Collaborator

Zolkin1 commented Aug 13, 2024

Inevitably a user will want to publish a non-obelisk message and there is a not a good reason to make this barrier high. Things like viz, or even just custom user types should be able to easily interface with Obelisk.
@Zolkin1 Zolkin1 added enhancement New feature or request high priority This issue is on the top of the todo list labels Aug 13, 2024
@Zolkin1 Zolkin1 mentioned this issue Oct 8, 2024
Open
18 tasks
@Zolkin1 Zolkin1 linked a pull request Nov 4, 2024 that will close this issue
Removal of Obelisk only messages on C++ and addition of Joystick Interface #121
Merged
@Zolkin1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Zolkin1 commented Nov 4, 2024

Still need the python side.

@Zolkin1 Zolkin1 closed this as completed Jan 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request high priority This issue is on the top of the todo list
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Removal of Obelisk only messages on C++ and addition of Joystick Interface Caltech-AMBER/obelisk
1 participant
@Zolkin1