Skip to content

Model setup of Energy Hydrology #1170

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Model setup of Energy Hydrology #1170

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

kmdeck
Copy link
Member

@kmdeck kmdeck commented Jun 4, 2025

Purpose

Make model setup easier for soil models forced with atmospheric data. Our current constructor works well for simple cases, but when dealing with spatially varying parameters, and, eventually different parameterizations for albedo, etc, this helps expose that things that will change (the parameters, the parameterizations, the domain, the forcing), but hides that the things that will remain the same (how to setup the BC, create the model, sources, etc).

To-do

Better understand how to use this in simpler use cases. What about at a site where we know the soil type (clay) but not the parameters?

What about if we want to pass scalar parameters for all (that should work as is) - can demo in another case

add roughness parameters

Content


  • I have read and checked the items on the review checklist.

@kmdeck kmdeck force-pushed the kd/soil_model_setup branch from faad475 to dd84c3c Compare June 4, 2025 22:25
@kmdeck kmdeck mentioned this pull request Jun 23, 2025
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant