Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update virtual_dry_static_energy #185

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024
Merged

Update virtual_dry_static_energy #185

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

szy21
Copy link
Member

@szy21 szy21 commented Jan 22, 2024

Includes the reference T_0 and uses cp_d instead of cp_m in the virtual dry static energy calculation. This shouldn't make much difference, but is more consistent with other equations.

src/relations.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (dd73501) 92.91% compared to head (cda74a8) 92.78%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #185      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.91%   92.78%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          10        9       -1     
  Lines        1143     1137       -6     
==========================================
- Hits         1062     1055       -7     
- Misses         81       82       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@charleskawczynski charleskawczynski added the Launch Buildkite Add label to launch Buildkite label Jan 22, 2024
@szy21 szy21 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 22, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Jan 22, 2024
@szy21 szy21 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 22, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Jan 22, 2024
@szy21 szy21 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 23, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 805d172 Jan 23, 2024
19 of 20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Launch Buildkite Add label to launch Buildkite
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants