Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle missing test cases in run_validate_self_reflect #67

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

GovindHede
Copy link
Contributor

@GovindHede GovindHede commented Mar 12, 2025

User description

Issue

The function was raising an exception incorrectly (raise (...) instead of raise ValueError(...)).
This caused the error: "exceptions must derive from BaseException."

Fix

  • Changed raise (...) to raise ValueError(...) to ensure correct error handling.
  • Used .get() method for safer dictionary access.
  • Improved error messages for debugging.

Testing

  • Successfully ran python -m alpha_codium.solve_my_problem without errors.
  • Checked logs to confirm expected output.

PR Type

Bug fix, Enhancement


Description

  • Fixed incorrect exception handling in run_validate_self_reflect.

  • Used .get() for safer dictionary access.

  • Improved error messages for better debugging.


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Bug fix
run_fix_self_reflect.py
Improve exception handling and dictionary access safety   

alpha_codium/gen/stages/indirect/run_fix_self_reflect.py

  • Replaced incorrect raise syntax with raise ValueError.
  • Used .get() method for safer dictionary key access.
  • Enhanced error messages for mismatched test counts.
  • +5/-4     

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • Copy link

    Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here.

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Error Handling

    The PR fixes the exception raising syntax, but there's no error handling for potentially missing 'fixed_tests_explanations' key in the YAML. If this key is missing, line 39 would still fail.

    problem['tests_explanations'] = response_validate_reflect_yaml['fixed_tests_explanations']

    Copy link

    Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here.

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
    Possible issue
    Handle None value safely

    The code should handle the case where 'fixed_tests_explanations' key might be
    missing in the response_validate_reflect_yaml dictionary. Currently, it uses
    .get() but will still fail if the key doesn't exist and returns None, as
    len(None) will raise a TypeError.

    alpha_codium/gen/stages/indirect/run_fix_self_reflect.py [30-36]

     # check number of tests
     actual_number_of_tests = len(problem.get('public_tests', {}).get('input', []))
    -calculated_number_of_tests = len(response_validate_reflect_yaml.get('fixed_tests_explanations', []))
    +fixed_tests_explanations = response_validate_reflect_yaml.get('fixed_tests_explanations', [])
    +calculated_number_of_tests = len(fixed_tests_explanations) if fixed_tests_explanations is not None else 0
     if actual_number_of_tests != calculated_number_of_tests:
         raise ValueError(
             f"Error: number of tests in validate self-reflection ({calculated_number_of_tests}) "
             f"does not match the actual number of tests ({actual_number_of_tests})")
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    __

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential TypeError if 'fixed_tests_explanations' is missing and returns None. The improved code safely handles this edge case by explicitly checking for None before calling len(), preventing a runtime error in unexpected scenarios.

    Medium
    • More

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant