-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
operation_module_code_clean #3751
Conversation
Important Review skippedMore than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review. 68 files out of 150 files are above the max files limit of 75. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits. You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis pull request represents a comprehensive removal of the "Operations" module and associated office location functionality across multiple components of the application. The changes involve deleting entire modules, controllers, services, and views related to office locations, while also modifying existing code to remove references to centre or location-based features. The modifications span multiple modules, including CodeTrek, Expense, and User, indicating a significant architectural refactoring. Changes
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
composer.json (1)
OfficeSuite module files still present in the codebase
The verification reveals that the OfficeSuite module hasn't been completely removed:
- Multiple PHP files still exist in the OfficeSuite directory with their respective namespaces
- Active usage found in
Modules/User/Services/UserService.php
which depends onOfficeSuite\OfficeSuiteFacade
- Complete module structure present including configs, contracts, services (GSuite, Office365), and provider
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
82-86
: Verify OfficeSuite namespace removalThe PR objectives mention removing the Operations module, but the
OfficeSuite\\
namespace is still present in the autoload configuration. This might indicate incomplete removal of the module.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the OfficeSuite directory or any files within it still exist if [ -d "OfficeSuite" ]; then echo "OfficeSuite directory still exists" find OfficeSuite -type f -name "*.php" | while read -r file; do echo "Found file: $file" head -n 1 "$file" # Show the first line to verify namespace done fi # Search for any remaining references to OfficeSuite namespace rg "namespace OfficeSuite" --type php rg "use OfficeSuite" --type phpLength of output: 3718
resources/views/layouts/navbar.blade.php (3)
118-118
: Remove unnecessary comment.The comment "Deleted By Sagar" doesn't provide any value and should be removed. Git history already tracks who made the changes.
- <!-- Deleted By Sagar -->
Line range hint
119-140
: Fix duplicate HTML IDs in dropdown toggles.Multiple dropdown toggles are using the same ID 'navbarDropdown_sales'. HTML IDs must be unique within the document.
Update the KnowledgeCafe dropdown ID:
-<a id="navbarDropdown_sales" class="nav-link dropdown-toggle" +<a id="navbarDropdown_knowledge" class="nav-link dropdown-toggle"
Operations module removal needs additional cleanup
The Operations module has been removed from the navbar, but there are still several references to office locations in the codebase that need attention:
resources/views/hr/round-review-confirm-modal.blade.php
: Contains a form field for office locationModules/User/Entities/User.php
: Has office location related attribute and meta dataModules/HR/Http/Controllers/Recruitment/ApplicationController.php
: Uses office location in email templatesModules/HR/Database/Seeders/SettingsTableSeeder.php
: Contains office location placeholder in email templateapp/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php
: Has commented out but lingering office location referencesThese references should either be removed or refactored to align with the Operations module removal.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-200
: Verify complete removal of Operations module references.The Operations section has been removed from the navbar as intended. Let's verify there are no remaining references to the Operations module or office locations in other view files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to Operations module or office locations in view files echo "Checking for Operations module references..." rg -i "operations" resources/views/ --type blade echo "Checking for office location references..." rg -i "office.?location|centre.?id" resources/views/ --type bladeLength of output: 370
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to Operations module or office locations in view files # Using plain text search without file type restriction echo "Checking for Operations module references..." rg -i "operations" resources/views/ echo "Checking for office location references..." rg -i "office.?location|centre.?id" resources/views/Length of output: 395
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the context of the office location reference and verify if it's just a label or has functional dependencies echo "Checking the round-review-confirm-modal.blade.php file content..." cat resources/views/hr/round-review-confirm-modal.blade.php echo -e "\nChecking for any office location related routes or controllers..." rg -i "office.?location" --type phpLength of output: 8717
app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php (1)
38-39
: Define default location as a constant and improve error handling.The default location should be defined as a constant, and we should add proper error handling for missing user meta.
Apply this diff:
+ private const DEFAULT_LOCATION = 'Default Location'; + public function index() { // ... - $selectedLocation = auth()->user()->office_location ?? 'Default Location'; + try { + $selectedLocation = auth()->user()->office_location ?? self::DEFAULT_LOCATION; + } catch (\Exception $e) { + \Log::error('Failed to retrieve user location: ' . $e->getMessage()); + $selectedLocation = self::DEFAULT_LOCATION; + }Modules/CodeTrek/Http/Controllers/CodeTrekController.php (2)
Line range hint
19-19
: Critical: Re-enable authorization checksMultiple authorization checks are commented out throughout the controller with a note about "production issues". Disabling authorization checks exposes the application to potential security vulnerabilities by allowing unauthorized access to sensitive operations.
These checks should be re-enabled immediately after fixing the underlying production issues. Consider:
- Debugging the production issues with proper logging
- Implementing a temporary role-based fallback if needed
- Adding proper error handling around the authorization checks
Also applies to: 30-30, 54-54, 71-71, 82-82, 102-102
Line range hint
1-120
: Enhance error handling and loggingThe controller methods would benefit from proper error handling and logging, especially around database operations and service calls.
Consider wrapping critical operations in try-catch blocks and adding proper logging:
public function store(Request $request) { + try { $data = $request->all(); $this->service->store($data); return redirect()->route('codetrek.index'); + } catch (\Exception $e) { + \Log::error('Failed to store CodeTrek applicant: ' . $e->getMessage()); + return redirect()->back()->with('error', 'Failed to save applicant.'); + } }Modules/CodeTrek/Services/CodeTrekService.php (2)
Line range hint
83-88
: Clean up commented code and improve implementationThe commented code and TODO-style comments should be handled more appropriately:
- Remove the commented centre_id assignment as it's no longer needed
- Move the mail queue implementation to a separate task/issue
- // $applicant->centre_id = $data['centre']; $applicant->mentor_id = $data['mentorId']; $applicant->domain_name = $data['domain']; $applicant->latest_round_name = config('codetrek.rounds.introductory-call.slug'); - // Mail::queue(new CodetrekMailApplicant($data)); This line will be uncommented in the future when the use of the codeTrek module starts in the proper way. + // TODO: Implement email notification in a separate PR $applicant->save();Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the email notification implementation?
Line range hint
110-110
: Remove remaining centre_id assignmentThe update method still contains centre_id assignment which is inconsistent with the PR objectives of removing office_location dependencies.
- $applicant->centre_id = $data['centre'] ?? null;
Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/edit.blade.php (2)
Line range hint
21-95
: Consider extracting repeatable form groups into componentsThe form contains multiple similar form groups that could be extracted into reusable Blade components to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.
Consider creating components for:
- Text input groups
- Select input groups
- Form row wrapper
Example component structure:
// resources/views/components/form/text-input.blade.php @props(['name', 'label', 'required' => false, 'type' => 'text']) <div class="form-group col-md-5"> <label for="{{ $name }}" @class(['field-required' => $required])>{{ $label }}</label> <input type="{{ $type }}" class="form-control" name="{{ $name }}" id="{{ $name }}" {{ $attributes }}> </div>Usage:
<x-form.text-input name="first_name" label="First Name" required placeholder="Enter first name" :value="$applicant->first_name" />
Line range hint
67-80
: Improve graduation year selection implementationThe graduation year calculation logic in the template could be moved to a dedicated helper or computed property.
Consider moving the logic to:
- A blade component with computed properties
- A view composer
- The controller
Example:
// In a view composer or controller $graduationYears = collect(range(date('Y') + 4, 1990, -1)) ->mapWithKeys(fn($year) => [$year => $year]);Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/create.blade.php (1)
Line range hint
1-150
: Consider implementing form validation using a dedicated form request classThe form contains multiple validation rules (required fields, URLs, etc.) implemented through HTML attributes. While HTML5 validation is good for client-side validation, it should be backed by server-side validation.
Consider:
- Creating a dedicated form request class for prospect creation
- Moving validation rules to the form request class
- Using Laravel's form validation features for consistent validation handling
Would you like me to help create a form request class with appropriate validation rules?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (38)
Modules/CodeTrek/Entities/CodeTrekApplicant.php
(1 hunks)Modules/CodeTrek/Http/Controllers/CodeTrekController.php
(3 hunks)Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/edit.blade.php
(1 hunks)Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/index.blade.php
(0 hunks)Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/modals/add-applicant-modal.blade.php
(0 hunks)Modules/CodeTrek/Services/CodeTrekService.php
(1 hunks)Modules/Expense/Resources/views/create.blade.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Expense/Resources/views/edit.blade.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Config/config.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Database/Seeders/OfficeLocationTableSeeder.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Database/Seeders/OperationsDatabaseSeeder.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Database/Seeders/OperationsPermissionTableSeeder.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Entities/OfficeLocation.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Http/Controllers/OperationsController.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Providers/OperationsServiceProvider.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Providers/RouteServiceProvider.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Resources/views/layouts/master.blade.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Resources/views/modals/add-center-modal.blade.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Resources/views/office-location/edit.blade.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Resources/views/office-location/index.blade.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Routes/api.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Routes/web.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/Services/OperationService.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/composer.json
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/module.json
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/package.json
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/policies/OperationsPolicy.php
(0 hunks)Modules/Operations/webpack.mix.js
(0 hunks)Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/create.blade.php
(1 hunks)app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php
(2 hunks)composer.json
(1 hunks)config/constants.php
(0 hunks)database/migrations/2023_04_17_113950_create_office_locations_table.php
(0 hunks)database/migrations/2023_05_06_141606_add_centre_id_to_code_trek_applicant_table.php
(2 hunks)database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_remove_centre_id_from_code_trek_applicants.php
(1 hunks)modules_statuses.json
(0 hunks)resources/views/home.blade.php
(0 hunks)resources/views/layouts/navbar.blade.php
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (28)
- Modules/Operations/module.json
- Modules/Operations/Resources/views/office-location/edit.blade.php
- Modules/Operations/composer.json
- Modules/Operations/Entities/OfficeLocation.php
- Modules/Operations/package.json
- Modules/Operations/policies/OperationsPolicy.php
- Modules/Operations/Config/config.php
- Modules/Operations/webpack.mix.js
- Modules/Operations/Database/Seeders/OperationsDatabaseSeeder.php
- config/constants.php
- Modules/Expense/Resources/views/create.blade.php
- Modules/Operations/Resources/views/layouts/master.blade.php
- Modules/Operations/Database/Seeders/OfficeLocationTableSeeder.php
- modules_statuses.json
- database/migrations/2023_04_17_113950_create_office_locations_table.php
- Modules/Operations/Providers/RouteServiceProvider.php
- Modules/Operations/Routes/api.php
- Modules/Operations/Routes/web.php
- resources/views/home.blade.php
- Modules/Operations/Resources/views/modals/add-center-modal.blade.php
- Modules/Operations/Database/Seeders/OperationsPermissionTableSeeder.php
- Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/modals/add-applicant-modal.blade.php
- Modules/Operations/Resources/views/office-location/index.blade.php
- Modules/Expense/Resources/views/edit.blade.php
- Modules/Operations/Http/Controllers/OperationsController.php
- Modules/Operations/Providers/OperationsServiceProvider.php
- Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/index.blade.php
- Modules/Operations/Services/OperationService.php
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- database/migrations/2023_05_06_141606_add_centre_id_to_code_trek_applicant_table.php
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/create.blade.php (1)
48-48
: Verify the impact of POC user changes
Let's verify if this change aligns with the PR objectives and doesn't break any existing functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the POC user implementation to ensure there are no breaking changes.
Let me check the views to understand how the POC user selection is implemented and used.
POC user field implementation is properly integrated
The POC user field (poc_user_id
) is correctly implemented across the codebase:
- Required field validation in
ProspectRequest
- Foreign key constraint in the migration
- Proper model relationship in
Prospect
model - Consistent usage in create/edit forms with proper validation
- Proper handling in
ProspectService
for both create and update operations - Correct display in the prospect details view
The change in the create view is aligned with the existing implementation and maintains data integrity.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other files that might be affected by this POC user change
echo "Searching for related POC user references..."
rg -l "poc_user_id" --type php
# Check if there are any database migrations related to this field
echo "Checking for related migrations..."
fd -e php -p ".*create.*prospects.*" "database/migrations"
Length of output: 709
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the migration file to understand the POC user field definition
echo "Checking migration file content..."
cat "Modules/Prospect/Database/Migrations/2024_10_19_235918_create-prospects-table.php"
# Check the model relationships and field definitions
echo -e "\nChecking Prospect model..."
cat "Modules/Prospect/Entities/Prospect.php"
# Check the validation rules
echo -e "\nChecking validation rules..."
cat "Modules/Prospect/Http/Requests/ProspectRequest.php"
Length of output: 4937
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the views implementation
echo "Checking create view..."
cat "Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/create.blade.php"
echo -e "\nChecking prospect-details view..."
cat "Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/prospect-details.blade.php"
echo -e "\nChecking edit-prospect-details view..."
cat "Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/edit-prospect-details.blade.php"
# Check the service implementation
echo -e "\nChecking ProspectService..."
cat "Modules/Prospect/Services/ProspectService.php"
Length of output: 26609
composer.json
Outdated
"php": "7.5" | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix invalid PHP platform version
The platform configuration specifies PHP 7.5, which is not a valid PHP version (PHP versions went from 7.4 directly to 8.0). This conflicts with the requirement "php": "^7.4"
and could cause dependency resolution issues.
"platform": {
- "php": "7.5"
+ "php": "7.4"
},
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
"php": "7.5" | |
}, | |
"php": "7.4" | |
}, |
"allow-plugins": { | ||
"dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer": true | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add missing phpcodesniffer dependency
While the plugin is allowed, the dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer
package is not listed in the dependencies. This could lead to the plugin not being available when needed.
Add the following to the require-dev
section:
"require-dev": {
+ "dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer": "^3.0",
"barryvdh/laravel-debugbar": "^3.2",
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Schema::table('code_trek_applicants', function (Blueprint $table) { | ||
$table->dropForeign(['centre_id']); // Drops the foreign key constraint | ||
$table->dropColumn('centre_id'); // Drops the column | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
The migration looks good, but there are still references to centre_id
in Modules/CodeTrek/Services/CodeTrekService.php
that need to be addressed:
- Line 9:
$applicants = $query->where('centre_id', $centre);
- Line 10:
$applicantCountData = $applicantCountData->where('centre_id', $centre)->get();
- Line 12:
$applicant->centre_id = $data['centre'] ?? null;
Additionally, there's a commented-out relationship in Modules/CodeTrek/Entities/CodeTrekApplicant.php
that should be removed for code cleanliness.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify cascade effects.
The migration correctly handles the removal of both the foreign key constraint and the column. The order of operations is correct.
Let's verify there are no remaining references to centre_id:
Let me analyze the model relationships and validation rules to ensure we're not missing any dependencies before providing the final response.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to centre_id in the codebase
rg -i "centre_id|center_id" --type php
Length of output: 1839
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any models or controllers still using the relationship
ast-grep --pattern 'class CodeTrekApplicant extends Model {
$$$
public function $$$() {
$$$belongsTo$$$centre$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Also check for any request validation rules using this field
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends FormRequest {
$$$
public function rules() {
return [
$$$centre_id$$$
];
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 277
// public function center() | ||
// { | ||
// return $this->belongsTo(OfficeLocation::class, 'center_id'); | ||
// } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove commented-out code instead of keeping it.
Since we're removing the office_location dependencies as per PR objectives, we should remove this commented-out code entirely rather than keeping it. Commented-out code creates technical debt and can confuse future developers.
Apply this diff:
- // public function center()
- // {
- // return $this->belongsTo(OfficeLocation::class, 'center_id');
- // }
$centres = collect([ | ||
['id' => 1, 'centre_name' => 'Center 1'], | ||
['id' => 2, 'centre_name' => 'Center 2'], | ||
['id' => 3, 'centre_name' => 'Center 3'], | ||
])->sortBy('centre_name'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Move hardcoded centers to configuration.
Hardcoding center data in the controller violates separation of concerns. This should be moved to a configuration file.
Create a new config file config/centers.php
:
<?php
return [
'centers' => [
['id' => 1, 'centre_name' => 'Center 1'],
['id' => 2, 'centre_name' => 'Center 2'],
['id' => 3, 'centre_name' => 'Center 3'],
]
];
Then update the controller:
- $centres = collect([
- ['id' => 1, 'centre_name' => 'Center 1'],
- ['id' => 2, 'centre_name' => 'Center 2'],
- ['id' => 3, 'centre_name' => 'Center 3'],
- ])->sortBy('centre_name');
+ $centres = collect(config('centers.centers'))->sortBy('centre_name');
// $request->validate([ | ||
// 'centre_name' => 'required|exists:office_locations,centre_name', | ||
// ]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove commented validation rules.
Since we're removing office_location dependencies, we should remove these commented-out validation rules entirely.
Apply this diff:
- // $request->validate([
- // 'centre_name' => 'required|exists:office_locations,centre_name',
- // ]);
+ $request->validate([
+ 'centre_name' => 'required|string',
+ ]);
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
// $request->validate([ | |
// 'centre_name' => 'required|exists:office_locations,centre_name', | |
// ]); | |
$request->validate([ | |
'centre_name' => 'required|string', | |
]); |
@@ -28,7 +27,7 @@ public function index(Request $request) | |||
{ | |||
// $this->authorize('view', $applicant); There are some issues in the production, which is why these lines are commented out. | |||
|
|||
$centres = OfficeLocation::all(); | |||
// $centres = OfficeLocation::all(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove commented code instead of leaving it
The commented lines related to OfficeLocation
should be removed rather than left as comments, as they're no longer needed according to the PR objectives.
- // $centres = OfficeLocation::all();
- // 'centres' => $centres,
Also applies to: 43-43
<select name="poc_user_id" id="poc_user_id" class="form-control" required > | ||
<option value="">Select POC User</option> | ||
@foreach ($users as $user) | ||
<option value="1">User</option> | ||
<!-- @foreach ($users as $user) | ||
<option value="{{ $user->id }}" | ||
{{ old('poc_user_id') == $user->id ? 'selected' : '' }}> | ||
{{ $user->name }}</option> | ||
@endforeach | ||
@endforeach --> | ||
</select> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hardcoded user selection needs attention
The POC user selection has been simplified to a single hardcoded user option, which seems incomplete and could limit functionality. Additionally, keeping commented-out code adds unnecessary noise to the codebase.
Consider these improvements:
- Restore dynamic user selection or provide justification for limiting to a single user
- Remove the commented-out code if it's no longer needed
- <select name="poc_user_id" id="poc_user_id" class="form-control" required >
- <option value="">Select POC User</option>
- <option value="1">User</option>
- <!-- @foreach ($users as $user)
- <option value="{{ $user->id }}"
- {{ old('poc_user_id') == $user->id ? 'selected' : '' }}>
- {{ $user->name }}</option>
- @endforeach -->
+ <select name="poc_user_id" id="poc_user_id" class="form-control" required>
+ <option value="">Select POC User</option>
+ @foreach ($users as $user)
+ <option value="{{ $user->id }}"
+ {{ old('poc_user_id') == $user->id ? 'selected' : '' }}>
+ {{ $user->name }}</option>
+ @endforeach
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<select name="poc_user_id" id="poc_user_id" class="form-control" required > | |
<option value="">Select POC User</option> | |
@foreach ($users as $user) | |
<option value="1">User</option> | |
<!-- @foreach ($users as $user) | |
<option value="{{ $user->id }}" | |
{{ old('poc_user_id') == $user->id ? 'selected' : '' }}> | |
{{ $user->name }}</option> | |
@endforeach | |
@endforeach --> | |
</select> | |
<select name="poc_user_id" id="poc_user_id" class="form-control" required> | |
<option value="">Select POC User</option> | |
@foreach ($users as $user) | |
<option value="{{ $user->id }}" | |
{{ old('poc_user_id') == $user->id ? 'selected' : '' }}> | |
{{ $user->name }}</option> | |
@endforeach |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php (1)
Office location functionality requires comprehensive removal
The codebase shows multiple components still depending on the office location feature that need to be addressed:
- Route:
/current-employee-location
inroutes/web.php
- Models:
User
model hasoffice_location
accessor inModules/User/Entities/User.php
- Views: Location references in
resources/views/hr/round-review-confirm-modal.blade.php
- Database: Foreign key references to
office_locations
table in migrations- Controller: Location-related code in
HomeController.php
For a clean removal, all these components should be removed or updated accordingly to maintain codebase consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-85
: Verify complete removal of location functionalityTo ensure complete removal of office_location dependencies, we need to verify related components.
Office location functionality needs complete cleanup
Several components still reference the office location functionality that appears to be in the process of removal:
- Route definition in
routes/web.php
for employee location updates- Foreign key references to
office_locations
table in migrations- User model in
Modules/User/Entities/User.php
hasoffice_location
accessor- Location-related code in
HomeController.php
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining references to office_location and related functionality # Check routes referencing storeEmployeeLocation echo "Checking routes..." rg "storeEmployeeLocation" routes/ # Check views using selectedLocation echo "Checking views..." rg "selectedLocation" resources/views/ # Check remaining office_location references echo "Checking office_location references..." rg "office_location" # Check UserMeta usage for office_location echo "Checking UserMeta office_location usage..." rg -A 3 "meta_key.*office_location"Length of output: 1817
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify if there are any views or templates using this functionality # and check for the office_locations table structure # Check for any view files referencing location echo "Checking views for location references..." rg -i "location|centre" resources/views/ # Check for office_locations table references echo "Checking office_locations table references..." fd -e php | xargs rg "office_locations" # Check for any location-related forms echo "Checking for location forms..." rg -i "form.*location|location.*form" resources/views/Length of output: 3032
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Modules/CodeTrek/Entities/CodeTrekApplicant.php
(0 hunks)Modules/CodeTrek/Http/Controllers/CodeTrekController.php
(1 hunks)Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/index.blade.php
(0 hunks)app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php
(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- Modules/CodeTrek/Entities/CodeTrekApplicant.php
- Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/index.blade.php
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Modules/CodeTrek/Http/Controllers/CodeTrekController.php
return view('home')->with([ | ||
'book' => $unreadBook, | ||
'selectedLocation' => $selectedLocation, | ||
]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing location-related view data
Since we're removing the office_location functionality as per PR objectives, we should also remove the selectedLocation
from the view data.
Apply this diff:
return view('home')->with([
'book' => $unreadBook,
- 'selectedLocation' => $selectedLocation,
]);
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
return view('home')->with([ | |
'book' => $unreadBook, | |
'selectedLocation' => $selectedLocation, | |
]); | |
return view('home')->with([ | |
'book' => $unreadBook, | |
]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/index.blade.php (2)
Line range hint
90-95
: Clean up remaining centre references in navigationThere are still references to the centre parameter in various parts of the template:
- URL parameter generation for navigation
- Hidden inputs in forms
Remove all remaining centre references from the navigation and filtering logic:
-$centre = request()->get('centre'); // ... and remove 'centre' from all route parameters, e.g.: - <input type="hidden" name="centre" value="{{ request()->get('centre') }}">Also applies to: 150-155
257-303
: Enhance Vue.js component robustnessWhile the changes improve the code, consider these enhancements:
- Add frontend validation before submission
- Implement proper loading state management
- Add type checking for response data
Consider this enhancement:
methods: { + validateForm(formData) { + const required = ['first_name', 'email']; + for (const field of required) { + if (!formData.get(field)) { + this.$toast.error(`${field} is required`); + return false; + } + } + return true; + }, submitForm: async function(formId) { $('.save-btn').attr('disabled', true); + this.isLoading = true; let formData = new FormData(document.getElementById(formId)); + + if (!this.validateForm(formData)) { + $('.save-btn').attr('disabled', false); + this.isLoading = false; + return; + } await axios.post(storeUrl, formData) .then((response) => { + if (!response?.data?.success) { + throw new Error('Invalid response format'); + } // ... rest of success handling }) .catch((error) => { + const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.errors + ? Object.values(error.response.data.errors)[0][0] + : 'An unexpected error occurred'; + this.$toast.error(errorMessage); }) + .finally(() => { + this.isLoading = false; + }); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
composer.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/index.blade.php
(1 hunks)Modules/CodeTrek/Services/CodeTrekService.php
(0 hunks)app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php
(2 hunks)app/Models/KnowledgeCafe/WeeklyDose.php
(1 hunks)composer.json
(2 hunks)database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_remove_centre_id_from_code_trek_applicants.php
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- Modules/CodeTrek/Services/CodeTrekService.php
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/Models/KnowledgeCafe/WeeklyDose.php
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_remove_centre_id_from_code_trek_applicants.php
- composer.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php (2)
30-35
:
Remove remaining office_location dependencies
The PR objectives specify removing all office_location dependencies, but this code still relies on them. The office_location
attribute and view data should be removed entirely.
Apply this diff:
- $selectedLocation = auth()->user()->office_location ?? 'Default Location';
-
return view('home')->with([
- 'book' => $unreadBook,
- 'selectedLocation' => $selectedLocation,
+ 'book' => $unreadBook
]);
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Line range hint 75-86
: Remove storeEmployeeLocation method
This entire method should be removed as it maintains office_location functionality, which contradicts the PR objectives of removing all office_location dependencies.
Remove the entire storeEmployeeLocation
method as it's no longer needed.
Additionally, verify if there are any routes or views still referencing this method:
// public function getUserGroups($email) | ||
// { | ||
// $client = new Google_Client(); | ||
// $client->useApplicationDefaultCredentials(); | ||
// $client->setSubject(env('GOOGLE_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_IMPERSONATE')); | ||
// $client->addScope([ | ||
// Google_Service_Directory::ADMIN_DIRECTORY_GROUP, | ||
// Google_Service_Directory::ADMIN_DIRECTORY_GROUP_READONLY, | ||
// ]); | ||
|
||
$userGroups = []; | ||
if (count($groups)) { | ||
foreach ($groups as $group) { | ||
$userGroups[$group->email] = $group->name; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
// $dir = new Google_Service_Directory($client); | ||
// $googleGroups = $dir->groups->listGroups([ | ||
// 'userKey' => $email, | ||
// ]); | ||
// $groups = $googleGroups->getGroups(); | ||
|
||
return $userGroups; | ||
} | ||
// $userGroups = []; | ||
// if (count($groups)) { | ||
// foreach ($groups as $group) { | ||
// $userGroups[$group->email] = $group->name; | ||
// } | ||
// } | ||
|
||
// return $userGroups; | ||
// } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove commented code
Commented-out code should be removed as it adds unnecessary noise to the codebase. If this functionality is needed in the future, it can be retrieved from version control history.
Remove the entire commented getUserGroups
method.
Employee portal
|
Project |
Employee portal
|
Branch Review |
refs/pull/3751/merge
|
Run status |
|
Run duration | 00m 25s |
Commit |
|
Committer | Sagar Sharma |
View all properties for this run ↗︎ |
Test results | |
---|---|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
4
|
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php (1)
Line range hint
1-58
: Ensure complete removal of office location functionalityThe current implementation appears to be an incomplete removal of the office location functionality. For a clean architectural separation:
- Remove all office location references from the User model
- Remove the office_location meta_key handling from UserMeta
- Update all views to remove location-related UI elements
- Remove related routes from the router configuration
This ensures we don't leave behind partially implemented features.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php
(2 hunks)database/migrations/2023_05_06_141606_add_centre_id_to_code_trek_applicant_table.php
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- database/migrations/2023_05_06_141606_add_centre_id_to_code_trek_applicant_table.php
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php (1)
5-8
: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate
The added imports for Book model and RedirectResponse are correctly aligned with their usage in the code.
|
||
$unreadBook = session('disable_book_suggestion') ? null : Book::getRandomUnreadBook(); | ||
$centres = OfficeLocation::orderBy('centre_name', 'asc')->get(); | ||
|
||
$selectedLocation = auth()->user()->office_location; | ||
$selectedLocation = auth()->user()->office_location ?? 'Default Location'; | ||
|
||
return view('home')->with([ | ||
'book' => $unreadBook, | ||
'centres' => $centres, | ||
'selectedLocation' => $selectedLocation, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove remaining office_location dependencies
This code segment still contains office location references despite the PR objective to remove all office_location dependencies.
Apply this diff to align with PR objectives:
- $selectedLocation = auth()->user()->office_location ?? 'Default Location';
-
return view('home')->with([
- 'book' => $unreadBook,
- 'selectedLocation' => $selectedLocation,
+ 'book' => $unreadBook
]);
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
$unreadBook = session('disable_book_suggestion') ? null : Book::getRandomUnreadBook(); | |
$centres = OfficeLocation::orderBy('centre_name', 'asc')->get(); | |
$selectedLocation = auth()->user()->office_location; | |
$selectedLocation = auth()->user()->office_location ?? 'Default Location'; | |
return view('home')->with([ | |
'book' => $unreadBook, | |
'centres' => $centres, | |
'selectedLocation' => $selectedLocation, | |
$unreadBook = session('disable_book_suggestion') ? null : Book::getRandomUnreadBook(); | |
return view('home')->with([ | |
'book' => $unreadBook | |
]); |
* Store the user's office location. | ||
* | ||
* @return array List of groups | ||
* @param Request $request | ||
* @return RedirectResponse | ||
*/ | ||
public function getUserGroups($email) | ||
public function storeEmployeeLocation(Request $request): RedirectResponse | ||
{ | ||
$client = new Google_Client(); | ||
$client->useApplicationDefaultCredentials(); | ||
$client->setSubject(env('GOOGLE_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_IMPERSONATE')); | ||
$client->addScope([ | ||
Google_Service_Directory::ADMIN_DIRECTORY_GROUP, | ||
Google_Service_Directory::ADMIN_DIRECTORY_GROUP_READONLY, | ||
]); | ||
|
||
$dir = new Google_Service_Directory($client); | ||
$googleGroups = $dir->groups->listGroups([ | ||
'userKey' => $email, | ||
]); | ||
$groups = $googleGroups->getGroups(); | ||
|
||
$userGroups = []; | ||
if (count($groups)) { | ||
foreach ($groups as $group) { | ||
$userGroups[$group->email] = $group->name; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
return $userGroups; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public function storeEmployeeLocation(Request $request) | ||
{ | ||
$request->validate([ | ||
'centre_name' => 'required|exists:office_locations,centre_name', | ||
'centre_name' => 'required|string|max:255', | ||
]); | ||
|
||
UserMeta::updateOrCreate( | ||
['user_id' => auth()->user()->id, 'meta_key' => 'office_location'], | ||
['meta_value' => $request->centre_name] | ||
); | ||
|
||
return redirect('home'); | ||
return redirect()->route('home')->with('status', 'Location updated successfully!'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove storeEmployeeLocation method and its route
The verification confirms this functionality should be removed:
- Route defined in
routes/web.php
:Route::post('/current-employee-location', 'HomeController@storeEmployeeLocation')
- Method in
HomeController.php
storing location in UserMeta table - No active references in views/JS files to this route
- The only
centre_name
reference in views is unrelated (CodeTrek module's centre selection)
Required changes:
- Delete the
storeEmployeeLocation
method fromHomeController.php
- Remove the route definition
Route::post('/current-employee-location'...)
fromroutes/web.php
🔗 Analysis chain
Remove storeEmployeeLocation method
This entire method should be removed as it contradicts the PR objective of removing office location functionality. The method still handles storing office locations in UserMeta, which should be eliminated as part of this refactoring.
Let's verify if this method is still referenced:
After confirming no active references, remove the entire method and its corresponding route definition.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for route definitions or view references to storeEmployeeLocation
rg -l "storeEmployeeLocation|route\(['\"]store.employee.location"
Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the route definition and any related view files
rg "storeEmployeeLocation|route\(['\"]store.employee.location" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 730
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any views or JavaScript files referencing this route
rg -i "update\.employee\.location|current-employee-location" --type html --type js -A 2 -B 2
# Also check for any references to the centre_name field
rg "centre_name" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 1401
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php (1)
Line range hint
1-84
: Architectural Cleanup RequiredThe current state of this controller still maintains office location functionality, which contradicts the PR's primary objective of removing the operation module and office_location dependencies. To maintain architectural consistency:
- Remove all office location related code from this controller
- Update related views to remove location references
- Consider updating tests that might be expecting location data
Would you like assistance in generating a comprehensive cleanup plan?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php (3)
30-35
:
Remove remaining office_location dependencies
This code segment still contains office location references despite the PR objective to remove all office_location dependencies.
Apply this diff to align with PR objectives:
- $selectedLocation = auth()->user()->office_location ?? 'Default Location';
-
return view('home')->with([
- 'book' => $unreadBook,
- 'selectedLocation' => $selectedLocation,
+ 'book' => $unreadBook
]);
38-70
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove commented code
Commented-out code should be removed as it adds unnecessary noise to the codebase. If this functionality is needed in the future, it can be retrieved from version control history.
Remove the entire commented getUserGroups
method.
Line range hint 72-84
: Remove storeEmployeeLocation method and its route
This method should be removed entirely as it contradicts the PR objective of removing office location functionality. The method still handles storing office locations in UserMeta.
Let's verify if this method is still referenced:
Required changes:
- Delete the
storeEmployeeLocation
method fromHomeController.php
- Remove the route definition from
routes/web.php
- Remove any view/JS references to this endpoint
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_cleanup_office_location.php (1)
30-35
: Use unsignedBigInteger for consistency.
When referencing a typicalusers.id
column, it’s best practice to use$table->unsignedBigInteger('centre_head_id');
to avoid potential conflicts and maintain consistency with Laravel’s default bigIncrements for theid
column in theusers
table.- $table->integer('centre_head_id')->unsigned(); + $table->unsignedBigInteger('centre_head_id');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/index.blade.php
(7 hunks)app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php
(0 hunks)database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_cleanup_office_location.php
(1 hunks)resources/views/layouts/navbar.blade.php
(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- resources/views/layouts/navbar.blade.php
- app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/index.blade.php
🔇 Additional comments (1)
database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_cleanup_office_location.php (1)
42-43
: Align foreign key column types.
centre_id
in code_trek_applicants
is created as unsignedBigInteger
, which is good. Ensure that all references here and in other relevant tables consistently use the same type, preventing range mismatch and foreign key conflicts.
$table->dropForeign('centre_id'); | ||
$table->dropColumn('centre_id'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Foreign key constraint name needs to be corrected
The foreign key constraint name should be code_trek_applicants_centre_id_foreign
based on Laravel's naming convention. The current migration and the original migration that created this foreign key both use an incorrect constraint name 'centre_id'
. This should be updated to:
$table->dropForeign(['centre_id']); // Use array syntax with column name
- Location:
database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_cleanup_office_location.php:17
The current code could fail during migration because Laravel automatically names foreign key constraints as {table_name}_{column_name}_foreign
. This pattern is evident from the Laravel documentation and is a standard convention. Both the original migration that added this constraint and this cleanup migration are using an incorrect constraint name, which needs to be fixed to ensure successful migration execution.
🔗 Analysis chain
Potential mismatch in foreign key name.
Laravel typically names constraints in the format table_column_foreign
. If your actual foreign key constraint name differs from 'centre_id'
, this migration could fail. Please confirm or use $table->dropForeign(['centre_id'])
to ensure consistency.
Run the following script to search for how Laravel named the foreign key:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check existing migration logic for foreign key naming
rg -A 2 $'foreignId\\(\\\'centre_id\\\'\\)'
Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for foreign key definitions in migrations
rg -l "foreign|foreignId" database/migrations/
Length of output: 4194
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the content of the migration file
cat database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_cleanup_office_location.php
Length of output: 1446
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any previous migrations that might have created this foreign key
rg -l "centre_id" database/migrations/
Length of output: 189
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the table structure in schema
rg "Schema::create.*office_location" -A 10 database/migrations/
Length of output: 2592
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the migration that added the centre_id column to see how the foreign key was named
cat database/migrations/2023_05_06_141606_add_centre_id_to_code_trek_applicant_table.php
Length of output: 926
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.php-cs-fixer.php (1)
85-88
: LGTM! The new PHPDoc rules enhance documentation consistency.The addition of
phpdoc_no_alias_tag
andphpdoc_align
rules will improve documentation readability and maintainability by:
- Preventing the use of alias tags in PHPDoc
- Ensuring consistent alignment of key documentation elements
However, these CS Fixer changes seem unrelated to the main PR objective of removing the Operations module. Consider splitting these changes into a separate PR for better change management.
database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_cleanup_office_location.php (1)
30-44
: Optimize table and foreign key creation in down methodSeveral improvements can be made to the down method:
- Match column types with referenced columns
- Add indexes for foreign keys
- Consolidate Schema::table calls
Apply this diff to optimize the down method:
Schema::create('office_locations', function (Blueprint $table) { $table->id(); $table->string('centre_name'); - $table->integer('centre_head_id')->unsigned(); + $table->unsignedBigInteger('centre_head_id')->index(); $table->integer('capacity'); $table->integer('current_people_count'); $table->timestamps(); + $table->foreign('centre_head_id')->references('id')->on('users'); }); -Schema::table('office_locations', function (Blueprint $table) { - $table->foreign('centre_head_id')->references('id')->on('users'); -}); Schema::table('code_trek_applicants', function (Blueprint $table) { - $table->unsignedBigInteger('centre_id')->nullable(); + $table->unsignedBigInteger('centre_id')->nullable()->index(); $table->foreign('centre_id')->references('id')->on('office_locations'); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
composer.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/workflows/coding-standards.yml
(1 hunks).php-cs-fixer.php
(1 hunks)Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/index.blade.php
(7 hunks)app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php
(0 hunks)composer.json
(3 hunks)database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_cleanup_office_location.php
(1 hunks)resources/views/layouts/navbar.blade.php
(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- resources/views/layouts/navbar.blade.php
- app/Http/Controllers/HomeController.php
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/coding-standards.yml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Modules/CodeTrek/Resources/views/index.blade.php
- composer.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Integration testing
database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_cleanup_office_location.php
[error] 16-16: Migration failed: Can't DROP 'centre_id'; check that column/key exists in code_trek_applicants table
🔇 Additional comments (2)
database/migrations/2024_12_11_173633_cleanup_office_location.php (2)
1-8
: LGTM! Class structure follows Laravel conventions.The migration class is properly structured with necessary imports and follows Laravel's naming conventions.
14-21
: Verify complete cleanup of office location dependenciesSince this PR aims to remove all office location dependencies, let's verify if all related tables are properly handled.
Run this script to check for any remaining references to office locations or centre_id:
✅ Verification successful
Office location cleanup is complete and correct ✅
The migration properly handles all dependencies:
- Removes foreign key from code_trek_applicants table
- Drops the office_locations table
- No other tables depend on office_locations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to office locations or centre_id in migrations and schema # Check for any other tables referencing office_locations echo "Checking for foreign keys referencing office_locations table..." rg -l "references.*office_locations" database/migrations/ # Check for any remaining centre_id columns echo "Checking for any remaining centre_id columns..." rg -l "centre_id" database/migrations/ # Check for any other office location related tables echo "Checking for any other office location related tables..." rg "Schema::create.*office|location|centre" database/migrations/Length of output: 3758
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Integration testing
[error] 16-16: Migration failed: Can't DROP 'centre_id'; check that column/key exists in code_trek_applicants table
Schema::table('code_trek_applicants', function (Blueprint $table) { | ||
$table->dropForeign('centre_id'); | ||
$table->dropColumn('centre_id'); | ||
}); | ||
Schema::dropIfExists('office_locations'); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix foreign key drop to handle potential missing constraints
The migration is failing because:
- The foreign key constraint name is incorrect. Laravel uses the convention
table_name_column_name_foreign
- The constraint might not exist in some environments
Apply this diff to make the migration more robust:
Schema::table('code_trek_applicants', function (Blueprint $table) {
- $table->dropForeign('centre_id');
+ // Drop foreign key if exists
+ $table->getConnection()
+ ->getDoctrineSchemaManager()
+ ->listTableForeignKeys('code_trek_applicants')
+ ->filter(fn($key) => $key->getLocalColumns() === ['centre_id'])
+ ->each(fn($key) => $table->dropForeign($key->getName()));
$table->dropColumn('centre_id');
});
This change:
- Uses Doctrine's schema manager to find existing foreign keys
- Drops any foreign key constraints referencing the centre_id column
- Makes the migration more resilient across different environments
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Schema::table('code_trek_applicants', function (Blueprint $table) { | |
$table->dropForeign('centre_id'); | |
$table->dropColumn('centre_id'); | |
}); | |
Schema::dropIfExists('office_locations'); | |
} | |
Schema::table('code_trek_applicants', function (Blueprint $table) { | |
// Drop foreign key if exists | |
$table->getConnection() | |
->getDoctrineSchemaManager() | |
->listTableForeignKeys('code_trek_applicants') | |
->filter(fn($key) => $key->getLocalColumns() === ['centre_id']) | |
->each(fn($key) => $table->dropForeign($key->getName())); | |
$table->dropColumn('centre_id'); | |
}); | |
Schema::dropIfExists('office_locations'); | |
} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Integration testing
[error] 16-16: Migration failed: Can't DROP 'centre_id'; check that column/key exists in code_trek_applicants table
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
Modules/HR/Observers/Recruitment/ApplicationRoundObserver.php (1)
Line range hint
9-9
: Remove unused importThe
SendApplicationRoundScheduled
job is imported but never used in the code. This was also flagged by the pipeline.Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-use Modules\HR\Jobs\Recruitment\SendApplicationRoundScheduled;
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Coding Standards
[warning] Unused import found: Modules\HR\Jobs\Recruitment\SendApplicationRoundScheduled
Modules/HR/Http/Controllers/Recruitment/ReportsController.php (3)
Line range hint
48-58
: Extract data transformation logic to a service class.The data transformation logic for chart preparation is duplicated across multiple methods (also seen in
showReportCard
).Create a dedicated service:
class ChartDataTransformer { public function transformApplicantData($records) { $data = []; foreach ($records as $row) { $data['label'][] = (new Carbon($row->date_created_at))->format('M d'); $data['data'][] = (int) $row->count; $data['afterBody'][] = $this->getVerifiedApplicationsCount($row->date_created_at); } return $data; } }
Line range hint
71-93
: Avoid code duplication with showReportCard method.The
showReportCard
method largely duplicates the logic fromsearchBydate
. The only significant difference is the date range calculation.Consider:
- Merging these methods
- Using a parameter to determine the date range
- Extracting common logic
public function getReportCard(Request $request, $useCustomRange = false) { $dateRange = $useCustomRange ? $this->getCustomDateRange($request) : $this->getDefaultDateRange(); return $this->generateReport($dateRange); }
Line range hint
94-117
: Optimize database queries in jobWiseApplicationsGraph.The method performs N+1 queries by iterating through jobs and making a separate count query for each.
Replace with a single efficient query:
public function jobWiseApplicationsGraph(Request $request) { $query = Application::select('hr_job_id', \DB::raw('COUNT(*) as count')) ->groupBy('hr_job_id'); if ($request->filled(['start_date', 'end_date'])) { $query->whereBetween('created_at', [$request->start_date, $request->end_date]); } $applicationCounts = $query->pluck('count', 'hr_job_id'); // ... rest of the logic }
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
Modules/HR/Observers/Recruitment/ApplicationRoundObserver.php (1)
Line range hint
20-38
: Consider refactoring for better separation of concernsThe observer is handling multiple responsibilities including status management, email notifications, and calendar events. Consider extracting these into dedicated services:
- Create an
ApplicationRoundEmailService
for email handling- Move calendar event creation to a dedicated
ApplicationRoundCalendarService
- Use dependency injection for these services
This would improve maintainability, testability, and adhere better to the Single Responsibility Principle.
Example refactoring:
class ApplicationRoundObserver { private $emailService; private $calendarService; public function __construct( ApplicationRoundEmailService $emailService, ApplicationRoundCalendarService $calendarService ) { $this->emailService = $emailService; $this->calendarService = $calendarService; } public function created(ApplicationRound $applicationRound) { $applicationRound->updateIsLatestColumn(); $applicationRound->load('application', 'scheduledPerson'); $applicationRound->application->untag('need-follow-up'); if ($this->shouldSendEmail($applicationRound)) { $this->emailService->sendInterviewScheduleEmail($applicationRound); } } // ... rest of the methods }Also applies to: 47-60, 65-86
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Coding Standards
[warning] Unused import found: Modules\HR\Jobs\Recruitment\SendApplicationRoundScheduled
Modules/HR/Http/Controllers/Recruitment/ReportsController.php (2)
Line range hint
29-47
: Consider extracting query logic to a dedicated repository.The
searchBydate
method contains complex query logic mixed with controller responsibilities. This violates the Single Responsibility Principle.Consider:
- Creating an
ApplicantRepository
class- Moving the query logic there
- Injecting the repository into the controller
Example structure:
class ApplicantRepository { public function getApplicantCountsByDateRange($startDate, $endDate) { return Applicant::select( \DB::raw('COUNT(*) as count'), \DB::raw('MONTHNAME(created_at) as month_created_at'), \DB::raw('DATE(created_at) as date_created_at') ) ->wheredate('created_at', '>=', $startDate) ->wheredate('created_at', '<=', $endDate) ->groupBy('date_created_at', 'month_created_at') ->orderBy('date_created_at', 'ASC') ->get(); } }
Line range hint
118-196
: Consider implementing caching for report data.The rejection reasons and round-wise rejection data queries are potentially expensive and might be cacheable if real-time accuracy isn't critical.
Example implementation:
private function getRejectionReasons($startDate, $endDate) { $cacheKey = "rejection_reasons_{$startDate}_{$endDate}"; return Cache::remember($cacheKey, now()->addHours(1), function () use ($startDate, $endDate) { return HRRejectionReason::select(...) ->whereDate('created_at', '>=', $startDate) ->whereDate('created_at', '<=', $endDate) ->groupBy('reason_title') ->get(); }); }Modules/ProjectContract/Http/Controllers/ProjectContractController.php (1)
Line range hint
1-146
: Consider splitting this controller to improve maintainability.The controller is handling too many responsibilities:
- Contract CRUD operations
- Email notifications
- Review management
- Client response handling
- Finance review process
This violates the Single Responsibility Principle and makes the code harder to maintain.
Consider splitting this into multiple controllers:
ProjectContractCrudController
- Basic CRUD operationsProjectContractReviewController
- Review processProjectContractFinanceController
- Finance-related operationsProjectContractClientController
- Client-specific operationsAdditionally, consider these improvements:
- Add input validation using Laravel Form Requests
- Add proper exception handling
- Add return type hints
- Add PHPDoc blocks for better documentation
- Move email logic to dedicated notification classes using Laravel's notification system
Would you like me to provide a detailed example of how to refactor this controller?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
.php-cs-fixer.php
(2 hunks)Modules/HR/Entities/Applicant.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Entities/Application.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Entities/Job.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Http/Controllers/Recruitment/ApplicationController.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Http/Controllers/Recruitment/ReportsController.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Jobs/SendHiringMailJob.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Listeners/AppointmentSlotMailSent.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Listeners/FollowUpListener.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Listeners/Recruitment/ApplicantEmailVerification.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Listeners/Recruitment/AutoRespondApplicant.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Listeners/Recruitment/CreateFirstApplicationRound.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Listeners/Recruitment/UpdateJobRounds.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Listeners/SendCustomApplicationMail.php
(1 hunks)Modules/HR/Observers/Recruitment/ApplicationRoundObserver.php
(2 hunks)Modules/HR/Observers/Recruitment/JobObserver.php
(3 hunks)Modules/ProjectContract/Http/Controllers/ProjectContractController.php
(1 hunks)app/Listeners/RemoveUserFromWebsite.php
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (14)
- Modules/HR/Jobs/SendHiringMailJob.php
- Modules/HR/Listeners/Recruitment/CreateFirstApplicationRound.php
- Modules/HR/Entities/Application.php
- Modules/HR/Http/Controllers/Recruitment/ApplicationController.php
- Modules/HR/Listeners/Recruitment/UpdateJobRounds.php
- app/Listeners/RemoveUserFromWebsite.php
- Modules/HR/Entities/Applicant.php
- Modules/HR/Listeners/AppointmentSlotMailSent.php
- Modules/HR/Observers/Recruitment/JobObserver.php
- Modules/HR/Entities/Job.php
- Modules/HR/Listeners/Recruitment/ApplicantEmailVerification.php
- Modules/HR/Listeners/FollowUpListener.php
- Modules/HR/Listeners/SendCustomApplicationMail.php
- Modules/HR/Listeners/Recruitment/AutoRespondApplicant.php
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .php-cs-fixer.php
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Coding Standards
Modules/HR/Observers/Recruitment/ApplicationRoundObserver.php
[warning] Unused import found: Modules\HR\Jobs\Recruitment\SendApplicationRoundScheduled
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Modules/HR/Observers/Recruitment/ApplicationRoundObserver.php (1)
16-16
: LGTM: Improved PHPDoc formattingThe parameter documentation formatting has been standardized, improving consistency and adherence to PSR standards.
Also applies to: 43-43
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Coding Standards
[warning] Unused import found: Modules\HR\Jobs\Recruitment\SendApplicationRoundScheduled
Modules/ProjectContract/Http/Controllers/ProjectContractController.php (2)
63-63
: LGTM! Case sensitivity fix.The correction from
client::all()
toClient::all()
is appropriate as PHP class names are case-sensitive.
Line range hint
5-9
: Verify dependencies after operations module removal.Since this PR removes the operations module and office location dependencies, let's verify that the imported models (
Client
,Country
) don't have any indirect dependencies on the removed components.✅ Verification successful
Imports are clean and aligned with operations module removal
The imported models (
Client
andCountry
) have no dependencies on the removed operations module or office locations. The cleanup migrations confirm these dependencies have been properly removed from the database schema.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining references to office locations in the Client and Country models echo "Checking Client model dependencies..." rg -l "office_location|OfficeLocation|centre_id|center_id" "app/Models/Client.php" echo "Checking Country model dependencies..." rg -l "office_location|OfficeLocation|centre_id|center_id" "Modules/Client/Entities/Country.php" # Check for any remaining operations module references echo "Checking for operations module references..." rg -l "Modules\\\\Operation|use Operation|operations?" "app/Models/Client.php" "Modules/Client/Entities/Country.php"Length of output: 563
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, verify if the files exist echo "Checking if files exist..." fd -t f "Client.php" "app/Models" fd -t f "Country.php" "Modules/Client" # Search for broader patterns in these models echo -e "\nChecking for operations and location related code..." rg "(?i)(office|location|centre|center|operation)" -t php "app/Models/Client.php" "Modules/Client/Entities/Country.php" -C 2 # Check migrations for related columns echo -e "\nChecking migrations..." fd -e php -t f . "database/migrations" "Modules/Client/Database/Migrations" --exec rg "(?i)(office|location|centre|center|operation)" # Look for relationship methods echo -e "\nChecking for relationship methods..." ast-grep --pattern 'public function $RELATION() { return $this->$$$; }'Length of output: 2334
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ public function index() | |||
|
|||
public function searchBydate(Request $req) | |||
{ | |||
$req->report_start_date = $req->report_start_date ?? carbon::now()->startOfMonth() == $req->report_end_date = $req->report_end_date ?? Carbon::today(); | |||
$req->report_start_date = $req->report_start_date ?? Carbon::now()->startOfMonth() == $req->report_end_date = $req->report_end_date ?? Carbon::today(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix the logical error and improve readability in date assignment.
The current line has multiple issues:
- The comparison operator
==
is incorrectly used where an assignment was intended - The single-line multiple assignment reduces readability
- The logic for default dates could be clearer
Replace with:
- $req->report_start_date = $req->report_start_date ?? Carbon::now()->startOfMonth() == $req->report_end_date = $req->report_end_date ?? Carbon::today();
+ $req->report_start_date = $req->report_start_date ?? Carbon::now()->startOfMonth();
+ $req->report_end_date = $req->report_end_date ?? Carbon::today();
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
$req->report_start_date = $req->report_start_date ?? Carbon::now()->startOfMonth() == $req->report_end_date = $req->report_end_date ?? Carbon::today(); | |
$req->report_start_date = $req->report_start_date ?? Carbon::now()->startOfMonth(); | |
$req->report_end_date = $req->report_end_date ?? Carbon::today(); |
Refactor: Remove Operation Module, Clean up Dependencies, and Update Migrations
1. Complete Removal of the Operation Module:
Removed the entire operation module from the project, including related controllers, views, models, and other resources.
The operation module was no longer in use, and this cleanup helps streamline the project by removing unnecessary code and improving maintainability.
2. Removing Dependency of office_location from the CodeTrek Module:
Removed all references to the office_location table within the CodeTrek module, including any foreign key relations and logic that depended on this table.
The dependency on the centre_id in the code_trek_applicants table has been completely eliminated.
The migration file related to code_trek_applicants was updated to remove the centre_id column and clean up the database schema.
3. Removing Dependency of office_location from the Expenses Module:
Removed all references to the office_location table within the expenses module.
This includes both the removal of any foreign key constraints and logic that linked office_location to the expense-related data.
Adjustments were made in the models, controllers, and views to ensure that the module works independently of the office_location table.
4. Migration File Changes for code_trek_applicant:
A migration file was created to update the code_trek_applicants table, including the removal of the centre_id column.
The migration ensures the database schema reflects the removal of any dependencies on the office_location table.
5. Deletion of the office_location Table:
The office_location table was removed from the database as it was no longer required.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Major Changes
Impact on User Experience
Technical Cleanup
Dependency Updates
Database Changes
office_locations
table.centre_id
references in applicant and user tables.