You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Despite of this versatility, so far only few attempts have been made to systemat
To bridge this gap, we set out to perform a thorough benchmarking study of bisulfite sequencing workflows. At the core of our benchmark is a set of samples with highly accurate methylation calls (Bock, Halbritter et al. 2016), which we use as the gold-standard. We evaluate the software in the context of five most widely used sequencing protocols and propose protocol-specific choice of workflows. To simplify the choice of workflows and enable continuity we developed rich data presentation and benchmarking resources. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive benchmarking study of bisulfite sequencing to date.
All CWLs combinations of the Benchmarking projects are listed in [Workflows.md](https://github.com/compepigen/PipelineOlympcis/blob/main/CWL/Workflows.md).
All CWLs combinations of the Benchmarking projects are listed in [Workflows.md](https://github.com/CompEpigen/PipelineOlympics/blob/c8dc36333fe9b55fc42fb4857943f284a13c485d/CWL/Workflows.md).
# Contact
We appreciate any feedback. Feel free to contact us by mailing to p.lutsik `at` dkfz-heidelberg.de and yu-yu.lin `at` dkfz-heidelberg.de.
