Sys 1 6 a17new

[lichtblaugue]

Description:
Reopen due to rebase problems
Added notes and controls for BSI SYS.1.6 A17

Rationale:
As we have multiple customers asking for a BSI profile to be included in the compliance-operator, we are contributing a profile. To provide a better review process, the individual controle are implemented as separate PRs.

[openshift-ci]

Hi @lichtblaugue. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[github-actions]

Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request:

ocp4 (from CTF) Environment (using Fedora as testing environment)

Fedora Testing Environment

Oracle Linux 8 Environment

[github-actions]

This datastream diff is auto generated by the check Compare DS/Generate Diff

Click here to see the full diff

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_general_node_separation'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_general_node_separation
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_general_node_separation
@@ -15,5 +15,8 @@
 [reference]:
 SYS.1.6.A3
 
+[reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A26
+
 [rationale]:
 Assigning workloads with high protection requirements to specific nodes creates and additional boundary (the node) between workloads of high protection requirements and workloads which might follow less strict requirements. An adversary which attacked a lighter protected workload now has additional obstacles for their movement towards the higher protected workloads.

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_drop_container_capabilities'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_drop_container_capabilities
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_drop_container_capabilities
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_container_allowed_capabilities'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_container_allowed_capabilities
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_container_allowed_capabilities
@@ -74,6 +74,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_dir_volume_plugin'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_dir_volume_plugin
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_dir_volume_plugin
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 SYS.1.6.A18
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_ports'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_ports
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_ports
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 CNTR-OS-000660
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_ipc_namespace'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_ipc_namespace
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_ipc_namespace
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 SYS.1.6.A18
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_net_raw_capability'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_net_raw_capability
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_net_raw_capability
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 SYS.1.6.A18
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_network_namespace'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_network_namespace
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_network_namespace
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 SYS.1.6.A18
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privilege_escalation'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privilege_escalation
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privilege_escalation
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privileged_containers'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privileged_containers
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privileged_containers
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 SYS.1.6.A18
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_process_id_namespace'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_process_id_namespace
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_process_id_namespace
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 SYS.1.6.A18
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_root_containers'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_root_containers
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_root_containers
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 SYS.1.6.A18
 
 [reference]:

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit 643e183 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 60.9% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

[yuumasato]

@lichtblaugue I believe this still contains unrelatd commits from another PR (CC: @sluetze)
The following commands should help you (adapt where needed):

$ git checkout master
$ git pull upstream master
$ git checkout sys-1-6-A17new
$ git rebase --onto master 1a886bd4036687080bd3049ba86af33cbf5c59a6
$ git push origin sys-1-6-A17new

[sluetze]

@lichtblaugue I believe this still contains unrelatd commits from another PR (CC: @sluetze) The following commands should help you (adapt where needed):

$ git checkout master
$ git pull upstream master
$ git checkout sys-1-6-A17new
$ git rebase --onto master 1a886bd4036687080bd3049ba86af33cbf5c59a6
$ git push origin sys-1-6-A17new

the commits are in, because we reference the newly defined rules. So testing with this set is only possible with these commits. This PR has to be merged after the other PR.
But at least it are now the same commits and not new commits with the same content