Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatic release and versioning #197

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions .github/workflows/check-for-release-label.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# For this check to pass you must have a release label on your PR.
# valid labels are: release/patch, release/minor, release/major, release/skip
name: Check For Release Label

on:
pull_request:
branches: [ master ]

jobs:
check_for_release_label:

runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- name: Get release label
uses: actions-ecosystem/[email protected]
id: release-label

- run: echo "Release level is ${{ steps.release-label.outputs.level }}"

- name: Fail if label does not exist, or skip if release/skip label exists
if: ${{ ( ! contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'release/skip') ) && ( steps.release-label.outputs.level == null ) }}
run: echo "Please label your PR with a release label" && exit 1
86 changes: 86 additions & 0 deletions .github/workflows/release-auto.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
# This GitHub action can publish assets for release when a tag is created.
# Currently its setup to run on any tag that matches the pattern "v*" (ie. v0.1.0).
#
# This uses an action (paultyng/ghaction-import-gpg) that assumes you set your
# private key in the `GPG_PRIVATE_KEY` secret and passphrase in the `PASSPHRASE`
# secret. If you would rather own your own GPG handling, please fork this action
# or use an alternative one for key handling.
#
# You will need to pass the `--batch` flag to `gpg` in your signing step
# in `goreleaser` to indicate this is being used in a non-interactive mode.
#
name: release-auto2

on:
pull_request:
types: [closed]

jobs:
auto-release:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: ${{ github.event.pull_request.merged == true }}
steps:
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout@v2

- name: Unshallow fetch
run: git fetch --prune --unshallow

- name: Get release label
uses: actions-ecosystem/action-release-label@v1
id: release-label
if: ${{ github.event.pull_request.merged == true }}

- name: Get latest tag
uses: actions-ecosystem/action-get-latest-tag@v1
id: get-latest-tag
if: ${{ steps.release-label.outputs.level != null }}

- run: |
echo "Latest tag: ${{ steps.get-latest-tag.outputs.tag }}"
echo "Release level: ${{ steps.release-label.outputs.level }}"

- name: Bump the version
uses: actions-ecosystem/action-bump-semver@v1
id: bump-semver
if: ${{ steps.release-label.outputs.level != null }}
with:
current_version: ${{ steps.get-latest-tag.outputs.tag }}
level: ${{ steps.release-label.outputs.level }}

- run: |
echo "New version: ${{ steps.bump-semver.outputs.new_version }}"

- name: Push new tag
uses: actions-ecosystem/action-push-tag@v1
if: ${{ steps.release-label.outputs.level != null }}
with:
tag: ${{ steps.bump-semver.outputs.new_version }}
message: '${{ steps.bump-semver.outputs.new_version }}: PR #${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} ${{ github.event.pull_request.title }}'

- name: Set up Go
uses: actions/setup-go@v2
if: ${{ steps.release-label.outputs.level != null }}
with:
go-version: 1.18.x

- name: Import GPG key
id: import_gpg
uses: paultyng/[email protected]
if: ${{ steps.release-label.outputs.level != null }}
env:
GPG_PRIVATE_KEY: ${{ secrets.GPG_PRIVATE_KEY }}
PASSPHRASE: ${{ secrets.PASSPHRASE }}

- name: Run GoReleaser
uses: goreleaser/goreleaser-action@v2
if: ${{ steps.release-label.outputs.level != null }}
with:
version: latest
args: release --clean
env:
GPG_FINGERPRINT: ${{ steps.import_gpg.outputs.fingerprint }}
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}



42 changes: 0 additions & 42 deletions .github/workflows/release.yml

This file was deleted.

8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion .gitignore
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16,4 +16,10 @@ glide.lock
gpg/

# ignore. For testing we don't want to store a specific provider.
.terraform.lock.hcl
.terraform.lock.hcl

# Adding to disregard some testing framework standup. - dbarcelo
node_modules/
package-lock.json
package.json
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you elaborate on this? What testing framework outside of go test? This may be of benefit to the team if you found a nice tool.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@DevOpsDave DevOpsDave Jan 18, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this was put in because I was attempting to run GH actions locally, and ultimately test without actually running in the repo and making changes. It was a passing try and I didn't spend too much time on it. Ultimately it was easier to simply model out the behavior I wanted in a separate repo, got it to work the way I wanted and then copy pasta'ed to this one.

Here is the content of package-json and test.js if you are curious:

{
  "dependencies": {
    "@actions/core": "^1.10.1",
    "@actions/exec": "^1.1.1"
  }
}
const core = require('@actions/core');
const exec = require('@actions/exec');

async function run() {
try {
// Set the input variables (if any)
core.getInput('myInputVariable');

// Execute the steps of our workflow
await exec.exec('echo', ['Hello, World!']);
// Add more steps as necessary

// Set the output variables (if any)
// Set the output variables (if any)
core.setOutput('myOutputVariable', 'Hello from local testing!');
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error.message);
}
}

If you are curious where I modeled the actions I did it here, should be 0 Cox properties in this public repo:
https://github.com/DevOpsDave/testing-github-actions

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@LumaC0 I removed the testing stuff from my repo and took out the .gitignore entiries that hid the artifacts since nothing was actually being done with it. Neater now.

test.js
Loading