EP-2261: BCO Premium Selection

[reldredge71]

Allows users to select a premium on branded checkout

[wrandall22]

There are still several references to radio station codes.

[wrandall22]

Feel free to merge it to staging locally after Travis passes here.

[reldredge71]

@wrandall22 I was working on Mike's request for an anchor on branded-checkout-step-1 to jump to the Premium section. I was having some difficulty with this, and it might not be the highest priority right now, but I did notice that the user's choice for the Premium selection was getting overwritten when navigating back to branded-checkout-step-1. I made an update here to make sure that the choice the user made will still appear when reversing steps.

Do you think I should still attempt to get the anchoring to work?

[wrandall22]

As far as anchoring...None of the other Change buttons go to a particular part of the page, outside of just the branded checkout component itself. That might be worth mentioning to Mike. It would be a new pattern not followed by the rest of the branded checkout.

[wrandall22]

I think part of the reason is that the branded checkout component has to load, and the anchoring probably happens before it loads completely, so anchoring into some HTML that doesn't yet exist will likely have issues.

[reldredge71]

Yes, when I saw that the sections of the checkout screen passed unique string values to changeStep, it made me think that anchoring was possible... then I realized that none of the sections had that functionality yet. I agree that timing the anchor navigation with the loading of the screen would be tricky. I can mention that to Mike.

[wrandall22]

I think that functionality is more used on standard checkout, where those steps are actually on different pages.

[reldredge71]

After I resolve the conflicts and rebase this on top of master, should I go ahead and merge this? John will need this to add the premium functionality to the plugin.

[wrandall22]

The last 2 commits could have their descriptions improved. What is happening in those commits is not what is described by the commit messages.

[wrandall22]

Thanks for making those updates! If you get these changes out on staging that will be helpful (if you haven't already).

[caleballdrin]

@wrandall22 it is on staging

[wrandall22]

Found a couple minor things while implementing AEM piece.

[wrandall22]

Thanks!

Changes requested have been made. Waiting for UAT and New Year before approving.

[wrandall22]

I wonder if we need to do more styling on the BCO side to help with the CMS side. Here is an example from WP and AEM:

[caleballdrin]

@wrandall22 the AEM one looks pretty bad. Is there a place I can test this and look at the CSS?

[wrandall22]

https://give-dev-cloud.cru.org/testing-grounds/test-cru-landing-page.html