Update newman to 6.0.0 #421
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This is only changing a Dev dependency, which is used for the local tests. The issue you linked shows that the reporter is working with version 6 of Newman. What testing have you done for this change? Newman v6 can only run on newer node versions so we would also need to change a few more things, as well as updating the number in that file. |
|
@DannyDainton I completely understand. I've updated the peer dependency but I'm afraid I'm not familiar at all with this dep - I'm just trying to resolve vulnerabilities being reported by our security software which is unfortunately only available in newman 6.0.0 and not backported to 5.x |
|
Also looking for Newman 6.0.0 support |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A proposed change to update to the newman 6.0.0 release as seen in this issue. Users have reported that this tool works just fine, I'm opening this PR in the hopes there is automated builds which will validate this, if not it will need some review from SMEs as I'm not familiar with this library