✨ [RUM-5500] React-router v7 support

[RomanGaignault]

Motivation

Add support for react-router v7 for the rum-react plugin.

Changes

Reuse as much as possible the code from react-router-6, adapt unit test instead of cloning them

Testing

• Local
• Staging
• Unit
• End to end

---

I have gone over the contributing documentation.

[cit-pr-commenter]

Bundles Sizes Evolution

📦 Bundle Name	Base Size	Local Size	𝚫	𝚫%	Status
Rum	145.98 KiB	145.98 KiB	0 B	0.00%	✅
Logs	51.06 KiB	51.06 KiB	0 B	0.00%	✅
Rum Slim	104.77 KiB	104.77 KiB	0 B	0.00%	✅
Worker	24.50 KiB	24.50 KiB	0 B	0.00%	✅

🚀 CPU Performance

Action Name	Base Average Cpu Time (ms)	Local Average Cpu Time (ms)	𝚫
addglobalcontext	0.003	0.002	-0.001
addaction	0.039	0.034	-0.005
addtiming	0.001	0.001	-0.000
adderror	0.046	0.046	-0.001
startstopsessionreplayrecording	0.008	0.010	0.003
startview	0.414	0.349	-0.066
logmessage	0.022	0.022	-0.000

🧠 Memory Performance

Action Name	Base Consumption Memory (bytes)	Local Consumption Memory (bytes)	𝚫 (bytes)
addglobalcontext	27.33 KiB	29.36 KiB	2.03 KiB
addaction	54.12 KiB	60.33 KiB	6.21 KiB
addtiming	26.15 KiB	27.18 KiB	1.03 KiB
adderror	59.09 KiB	61.54 KiB	2.45 KiB
startstopsessionreplayrecording	24.90 KiB	25.13 KiB	239 B
startview	413.20 KiB	421.60 KiB	8.40 KiB
logmessage	60.18 KiB	63.42 KiB	3.24 KiB

🔗 RealWorld

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.73%. Comparing base (bfffdaf) to head (f4e3802).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3299      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.70%   93.73%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         290      292       +2     
  Lines        7652     7658       +6     
  Branches     1745     1743       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits         7170     7178       +8     
+ Misses        482      480       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[BenoitZugmeyer]

💬 suggestion: ‏We should tweak check-license.js to take the real package name into account instead of its alias (react-router-dom-6 is not an actual package).

[BenoitZugmeyer]

❓ question: ‏Is this needed?

[BenoitZugmeyer]

❓ question: ‏Is this needed?

[BenoitZugmeyer]

💬 suggestion: ‏Add a comment at the top of the file to explain those types, like:

// Those types are used by our instrumentation functions to make them work with any react-router
// version we support. We should not import react-router types as we don't know which version
// will be used by the customer.
//
// Those types should be:
// * compatible with all react-router-dom versions we support
// * include the minimal set of attributes used by our instrumentation functions.