Update go.opentelemetry.io/collector/otelcol

[keisku]

What does this PR do?

Update go.opentelemetry.io/collector/otelcol.

Motivation

#32947

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

[cit-pr-commenter]

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: 09be5c8
Comparison: c788e17

binary	os	arch	change
agent	linux	amd64	+3, -3 +container/ring -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/config/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/experimental/storage +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/xextension/storage -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/receiverhelper/internal
agent	linux	arm64	+3, -3 +container/ring -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/config/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/experimental/storage +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/xextension/storage -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/receiverhelper/internal
agent	windows	amd64	+3, -3 +container/ring -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/config/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/experimental/storage +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/xextension/storage -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/receiverhelper/internal
agent	darwin	amd64	+3, -3 +container/ring -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/config/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/experimental/storage +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/xextension/storage -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/receiverhelper/internal
agent	darwin	arm64	+3, -3 +container/ring -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/config/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/experimental/storage +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/xextension/storage -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/receiverhelper/internal
iot-agent	linux	amd64	+3, -3 +container/ring -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/config/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/experimental/storage +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/xextension/storage -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/receiverhelper/internal
iot-agent	linux	arm64	+3, -3 +container/ring -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/config/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/experimental/storage +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/xextension/storage -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/receiverhelper/internal
heroku-agent	linux	amd64	+3, -3 +container/ring -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/config/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/experimental/storage +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/xextension/storage -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/receiverhelper/internal
serverless	linux	amd64	+3, -3 +container/ring -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/config/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/experimental/storage +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/xextension/storage -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/receiverhelper/internal
serverless	linux	arm64	+3, -3 +container/ring -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/config/internal -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/experimental/storage +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/extension/xextension/storage -go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/internal +go.opentelemetry.io/collector/receiver/receiverhelper/internal

[agent-platform-auto-pr]

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=52922880 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit c788e17

[agent-platform-auto-pr]

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 09be5c89b20db800c5fe99671da16c61eca8e724

Diff per package

package	diff	status	size	ancestor	threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb	0.11MB	⚠️	1004.92MB	1004.81MB	0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb	0.11MB	⚠️	988.88MB	988.77MB	0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm	0.11MB	⚠️	1014.59MB	1014.48MB	0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse	0.11MB	⚠️	1014.59MB	1014.48MB	0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm	0.11MB	⚠️	998.53MB	998.42MB	0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb	0.01MB	⚠️	56.34MB	56.33MB	0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm	0.00MB	✅	58.91MB	58.90MB	0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse	0.00MB	✅	58.91MB	58.90MB	0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb	0.00MB	✅	58.83MB	58.83MB	0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm	-0.00MB	✅	89.98MB	89.98MB	0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb	-0.00MB	✅	89.91MB	89.91MB	0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm	-0.01MB	✅	93.92MB	93.93MB	0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse	-0.01MB	✅	93.92MB	93.92MB	0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb	-0.01MB	✅	93.85MB	93.86MB	0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb	-0.01MB	✅	532.55MB	532.56MB	0.50MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

[cit-pr-commenter]

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 353ea80e-1cea-4477-8807-2350e11db79f

Baseline: 09be5c8
Comparison: c788e17
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu	% cpu utilization	+2.12	[+1.40, +2.83]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.63	[-0.16, +1.43]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_syslog_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	+0.61	[+0.53, +0.68]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.38	[-0.40, +1.17]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.06	[-0.83, +0.95]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.06	[-0.60, +0.72]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.04	[-0.60, +0.67]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1	egress throughput	+0.03	[-0.89, +0.96]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api	ingress throughput	+0.01	[-0.09, +0.11]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.01, +0.01]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2	egress throughput	-0.01	[-0.89, +0.87]	1	Logs
➖	file_tree	memory utilization	-0.02	[-0.18, +0.13]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	-0.04	[-0.07, -0.00]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	-0.11	[-0.19, -0.03]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load	egress throughput	-0.22	[-0.69, +0.24]	1	Logs
➖	quality_gate_logs	% cpu utilization	-1.65	[-4.76, +1.46]	1	Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed	links
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10	bounds checks dashboard
✅	quality_gate_logs	lost_bytes	10/10
✅	quality_gate_logs	memory_usage	10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

• ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
• ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
• ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

• quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
• quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

[songy23]

Here's a PR that does the same #32863

cc @jackgopack4

[jackgopack4]

rebasing that PR and seeing if tests pass

[keisku]

#32863 is going to do the same thing.