Skip to content

Conversation

maycmlee
Copy link
Contributor

@maycmlee maycmlee commented Sep 22, 2025

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

  • Adds an OP Access Control doc
  • Updates the Granular Access Control doc with an entry for Observability Pipelines
  • Adds a nav item

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). Without this format, your pull request will not pass CI, the GitLab pipeline will not run, and you won't get a branch preview. Getting a branch preview makes it easier for us to check any issues with your PR, such as broken links.

If your branch doesn't follow this format, rename it or create a new branch and PR.

[6/5/2025] Merge queue has been disabled on the documentation repo. If you have write access to the repo, the PR has been reviewed by a Documentation team member, and all of the required checks have passed, you can use the Squash and Merge button to merge the PR. If you don't have write access, or you need help, reach out in the #documentation channel in Slack.

Additional notes

@maycmlee maycmlee requested a review from a team as a code owner September 22, 2025 20:55
@maycmlee maycmlee added the editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review label Sep 22, 2025
@maycmlee maycmlee requested a review from a team as a code owner September 22, 2025 20:55
@github-actions github-actions bot added Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend Guide Content impacting a guide labels Sep 22, 2025
@maycmlee maycmlee changed the base branch from master to may/obs-pipelines-restructure September 22, 2025 20:55
@maycmlee maycmlee removed the request for review from a team September 22, 2025 20:55
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 22, 2025

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Guide Content impacting a guide label Oct 1, 2025

## Overview

Datadog's access management system uses role-based access control.This lets you define the level of access users have to different Datadog resources. Users are assigned to roles that define their account permissions, including what data they can read and which account assets they can modify. When [permissions](#permissions) are granted for a role, any user who is associated with that role receives those permissions. See [Role based access control][1] for more information.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

after "control." need a space


## Overview

Datadog's access management system uses role-based access control.This lets you define the level of access users have to different Datadog resources. Users are assigned to roles that define their account permissions, including what data they can read and which account assets they can modify. When [permissions](#permissions) are granted for a role, any user who is associated with that role receives those permissions. See [Role based access control][1] for more information.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

users role-based access control.

should we add "(RBAC)" after this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Updated.


## Overview

Datadog's access management system uses role-based access control.This lets you define the level of access users have to different Datadog resources. Users are assigned to roles that define their account permissions, including what data they can read and which account assets they can modify. When [permissions](#permissions) are granted for a role, any user who is associated with that role receives those permissions. See [Role based access control][1] for more information.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants