Test py3.12 lockfiles

[alopezz]

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Additional Notes

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Changelog entries must be created for modifications to shipped code
• Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
• If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.08%. Comparing base (9f3d9f9) to head (f9e20db).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Flag	Coverage Δ
active_directory	72.72% <ø> (ø)
activemq	?
activemq_xml	82.31% <ø> (ø)
amazon_msk	88.84% <ø> (ø)
ambari	85.80% <ø> (ø)
arangodb	98.23% <ø> (ø)
argo_rollouts	90.00% <ø> (ø)
argo_workflows	87.87% <ø> (ø)
argocd	87.81% <ø> (ø)
avi_vantage	91.35% <ø> (ø)
aws_neuron	92.42% <ø> (ø)
azure_iot_edge	82.08% <ø> (ø)
boundary	100.00% <ø> (ø)
btrfs	82.91% <ø> (ø)
cassandra	66.66% <ø> (ø)
cisco_aci	94.92% <ø> (ø)
citrix_hypervisor	87.50% <ø> (ø)
cloud_foundry_api	96.11% <ø> (ø)
cloudera	99.51% <ø> (ø)
coredns	94.51% <ø> (ø)
crio	89.79% <ø> (ø)
datadog_checks_downloader	81.35% <ø> (+3.23%)	⬆️
datadog_cluster_agent	90.19% <ø> (ø)
dcgm	92.10% <ø> (ø)
directory	95.24% <ø> (ø)
disk	89.34% <ø> (ø)
dns_check	93.33% <ø> (ø)
druid	97.70% <ø> (ø)
ecs_fargate	83.52% <ø> (ø)
eks_fargate	94.05% <ø> (ø)
external_dns	89.28% <ø> (ø)
fluentd	84.32% <ø> (ø)
fluxcd	88.31% <ø> (ø)
fly_io	97.13% <ø> (ø)
go_expvar	92.73% <ø> (ø)
gunicorn	91.04% <ø> (-1.87%)	⬇️
hazelcast	92.39% <ø> (ø)
hive	?
hivemq	61.90% <ø> (ø)
http_check	93.76% <ø> (ø)
hudi	?
ibm_i	81.91% <ø> (ø)
ignite	?
istio	77.51% <ø> (ø)
jboss_wildfly	47.36% <ø> (ø)
kafka	?
karpenter	95.06% <ø> (+0.69%)	⬆️
kube_apiserver_metrics	97.74% <ø> (ø)
kube_controller_manager	97.89% <ø> (ø)
kube_dns	95.97% <ø> (ø)
kube_metrics_server	94.87% <ø> (ø)
kube_proxy	96.80% <ø> (ø)
kube_scheduler	97.92% <ø> (ø)
kubelet	91.01% <ø> (ø)
kubernetes_cluster_autoscaler	93.22% <ø> (ø)
kubernetes_state	89.50% <ø> (ø)
kyototycoon	85.96% <ø> (ø)
linux_proc_extras	96.22% <ø> (ø)
marathon	83.12% <ø> (ø)
mcache	93.50% <ø> (ø)
mesos_master	89.81% <ø> (ø)
mesos_slave	93.31% <ø> (ø)
nagios	89.01% <ø> (ø)
network	80.04% <ø> (-12.57%)	⬇️
nfsstat	95.20% <ø> (ø)
nginx_ingress_controller	98.36% <ø> (ø)
nvidia_triton	88.52% <ø> (ø)
openmetrics	98.06% <ø> (ø)
php_fpm	89.71% <ø> (ø)
postfix	88.10% <ø> (ø)
presto	?
process	85.61% <ø> (ø)
prometheus	94.17% <ø> (ø)
pulsar	100.00% <ø> (ø)
riak	99.21% <ø> (ø)
silk	93.82% <ø> (ø)
solr	?
spark	92.52% <ø> (-1.63%)	⬇️
statsd	87.36% <ø> (ø)
supervisord	89.78% <ø> (ø)
system_core	92.66% <ø> (ø)
system_swap	98.30% <ø> (ø)
tcp_check	90.39% <ø> (ø)
teleport	99.61% <ø> (ø)
teradata	94.05% <ø> (ø)
tibco_ems	91.98% <ø> (ø)
tls	91.41% <ø> (ø)
tokumx	57.52% <ø> (ø)
traefik_mesh	76.75% <ø> (ø)
traffic_server	96.13% <ø> (ø)
twemproxy	79.56% <ø> (ø)
twistlock	80.47% <ø> (ø)
vllm	93.10% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.