Replace libdparse in AsmStyleCheck (#75)

src/dscanner/analysis/asm_style.d

@@ -6,37 +6,58 @@
 module dscanner.analysis.asm_style;
 
 import std.stdio;
-import dparse.ast;
-import dparse.lexer;
 import dscanner.analysis.base;
 import dscanner.analysis.helpers;
-import dsymbol.scope_ : Scope;
+import dmd.tokens;
 
 /**
  * Checks for confusing asm expressions.
  * See_also: $(LINK https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9738)
  */
-final class AsmStyleCheck : BaseAnalyzer
+extern (C++) class AsmStyleCheck(AST) : BaseAnalyzerDmd
 {
-	alias visit = BaseAnalyzer.visit;
-
+	alias visit = BaseAnalyzerDmd.visit;
 	mixin AnalyzerInfo!"asm_style_check";
 
-	this(string fileName, const(Scope)* sc, bool skipTests = false)
+	extern (D) this(string fileName, bool skipTests = false)
 	{
-		super(fileName, sc, skipTests);
+		super(fileName, skipTests);
 	}
 
-	override void visit(const AsmBrExp brExp)
+	override void visit(AST.AsmStatement asmStatement)
 	{
-		if (brExp.asmBrExp !is null && brExp.asmBrExp.asmUnaExp !is null
-				&& brExp.asmBrExp.asmUnaExp.asmPrimaryExp !is null)
+		for (Token* token = asmStatement.tokens; token !is null; token = token.next)
 		{
-			addErrorMessage(brExp.line, brExp.column, "dscanner.confusing.brexp",
-					"This is confusing because it looks like an array index. Rewrite a[1] as [a + 1] to clarify.");
+			if (isConfusingStatement(token))
+			{
+				auto lineNum = cast(ulong) token.loc.linnum;
+				auto charNum = cast(ulong) token.loc.charnum;
+				addErrorMessage(lineNum, charNum, KEY, MESSAGE);
+			}
 		}
-		brExp.accept(this);
 	}
+
+	private bool isConfusingStatement(Token* token)
+	{
+		if (token.next is null)
+			return false;
+
+		if (token.next.next is null)
+			return false;
+
+		TOK tok1 = token.value;
+		TOK tok2 = token.next.value;
+		TOK tok3 = token.next.next.value;
+
+		if (tok1 == TOK.leftBracket && tok2 == TOK.int32Literal && tok3 == TOK.rightBracket)
+			return true;
+
+		return false;
+	}
+
+private:
+	enum string KEY = "dscanner.confusing.brexp";
+	enum string MESSAGE = "This is confusing because it looks like an array index. Rewrite a[1] as [a + 1] to clarify.";
 }
 
 unittest
@@ -45,7 +66,7 @@ unittest
 
 	StaticAnalysisConfig sac = disabledConfig();
 	sac.asm_style_check = Check.enabled;
-	assertAnalyzerWarnings(q{
+	assertAnalyzerWarningsDMD(q{
 		void testAsm()
 		{
 			asm

src/dscanner/analysis/run.d

@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ unittest
 		config.asm_style_check = Check.enabled;
 		// this is done automatically by inifiled
 		config.filters.asm_style_check = filters.split(",");
-		return shouldRun!AsmStyleCheck(moduleName, config);
+		return moduleName.shouldRunDmd!(AsmStyleCheck!ASTCodegen)(config);
 	}
 
 	// test inclusion
@@ -464,10 +464,6 @@ MessageSet analyze(string fileName, const Module m, const StaticAnalysisConfig a
 
 	GC.disable;
 
-	if (moduleName.shouldRun!AsmStyleCheck(analysisConfig))
-		checks ~= new AsmStyleCheck(fileName, moduleScope,
-		analysisConfig.asm_style_check == Check.skipTests && !ut);
-
 	if (moduleName.shouldRun!CommaExpressionCheck(analysisConfig))
 		checks ~= new CommaExpressionCheck(fileName, moduleScope,
 		analysisConfig.comma_expression_check == Check.skipTests && !ut);
@@ -693,6 +689,12 @@ MessageSet analyzeDmd(string fileName, ASTCodegen.Module m, const char[] moduleN
 			config.useless_assert_check == Check.skipTests && !ut
 		);
 
+	if (moduleName.shouldRunDmd!(AsmStyleCheck!ASTCodegen)(config))
+		visitors ~= new AsmStyleCheck!ASTCodegen(
+			fileName,
+			config.asm_style_check == Check.skipTests && !ut
+		);
+
 	foreach (visitor; visitors)
 	{
 		m.accept(visitor);