Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Viewer support #648

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add Viewer support #648

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

forsyth2
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue resolution

Select one: This pull request is...

  • a bug fix: increment the patch version
  • a small improvement: increment the minor version
  • an incompatible (non-backwards compatible) API change: increment the major version

1. Does this do what we want it to do?

Objectives:

  • Objective 1
  • Objective 2
  • ...
  • Objective n

Required:

  • Product Management: I have confirmed with the stakeholders that the objectives above are correct and complete.
  • Testing: I have added or modified at least one "min-case" configuration file to test this change. Every objective above is represented in at least one cfg.
  • Testing: I have considered likely and/or severe edge cases and have included them in testing.

If applicable:

  • Testing: this pull request introduces an important feature or bug fix that we must test often. I have updated the weekly-test configuration files, not just a "min-case" one.
  • Testing: this pull request adds at least one new possible parameter to the cfg. I have tested using this parameter with and without any other parameter that may interact with it.

2. Are the implementation details accurate & efficient?

Required:

  • Logic: I have visually inspected the entire pull request myself.
  • Logic: I have left GitHub comments highlighting important pieces of code logic. I have had these code blocks reviewed by at least one other team member.

If applicable:

  • Dependencies: This pull request introduces a new dependency. I have discussed this requirement with at least one other team member. The dependency is noted in zppy/conda, not just an import statement.

3. Is this well documented?

Required:

  • Documentation: by looking at the docs, a new user could easily understand the functionality introduced by this pull request.

4. Is this code clean?

Required:

  • Readability: The code is as simple as possible and well-commented, such that a new team member could understand what's happening.
  • Pre-commit checks: All the pre-commits checks have passed.

If applicable:

  • Software architecture: I have discussed relevant trade-offs in design decisions with at least one other team member. It is unlikely that this pull request will increase tech debt.

@forsyth2 forsyth2 marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2024 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature]: Create HTML page for global time series
1 participant