Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add OperationalLocation element to OpXXXSpecificationType in Common.xsd to align with updated 950002. #96

Open
CharlieG021163 opened this issue Jan 23, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Add OperationalLocation element to OpXXXSpecificationType in Common.xsd to align with updated 950002. #96

CharlieG021163 opened this issue Jan 23, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
@terryrankine @gerardmoloneyetpartners
Labels
ERDi Issues that need to be fixed in ERDi version High MESA Issues that need to be fixed in MISA Version
Milestone
AcceptedByMESA

Comments

@CharlieG021163
Copy link
Collaborator

CharlieG021163 commented Jan 23, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Background and Solution
ERDi, MESA: OpXXXSpecificationTypes in Common.xsd are missing the OperationalLocation element to align with updated 950002 Operations Definition and Operational Location Models.
Related to #23 thread.
The following changes are required.

complexType name="OpPersonnelSpecificationType"
ADD: element name="OperationalLocation" type="ResourceLocationType" minOccurs = "0" />

complexType name="OpEquipmentSpecificationType"
ADD: element name="OperationalLocation" type="ResourceLocationType" minOccurs = "0" />

complexType name="OpPhysicalAssetSpecificationType"
ADD: element name="PhysicalLocation" type="ResourceLocationType" minOccurs = "0" />

complexType name="OpMaterialSpecificationType"
ADD: element name="StorageLocation" type="ResourceLocationType" minOccurs = "0" />

Impacted Types
Common.xsd

  • OpPersonnelSpecificationType
  • OpEquipmentSpecificationType
  • OpPhysicalAssetSpecificationType
  • OpMaterialSpecificationType

Supporting Document
950002 JWG5 CDV01 version (2019 12)
6.1.7 Personnel specification, Table 156 – Personnel specification attributes
6.1.9 Equipment specification, Table 160 – Equipment specification attributes
6.1.11 Physical asset specification, Table 164 – Physical asset specification attributes
6.1.13 Material specification, Table 168 – Material specification attributes
@CharlieG021163 CharlieG021163 mentioned this issue Jan 23, 2020
Open
CharlieG021163 referenced this issue Jan 23, 2020
@CharlieG021163
Update B2MML-Common.xsd
4c480c0 
ERDi, MESA: complexType name="OpPersonnelSpecificationType"  #23 Align with updated ISA-95 Part 2 Operations Definition Object.
   ADD: element name="OperationalLocation"  type="ResourceLocationType" minOccurs = "0" />

ERDi, MESA: complexType name="OpEquipmentSpecificationType"  #23 Align with updated ISA-95 Part 2 Operations Definition Object.
   ADD: element name="OperationalLocation"  type="ResourceLocationType" minOccurs = "0" />

ERDi, MESA: complexType name="OpPhysicalAssetSpecificationType"  #23 Align with updated ISA-95 Part 2 Operations Definition Object.
   ADD: element name="PhysicalLocation"  type="ResourceLocationType" minOccurs = "0" />

ERDi, MESA: complexType name="OpMaterialSpecificationType"  #23 Align with updated ISA-95 Part 2 Operations Definition Object.
   ADD: element name="StorageLocation"  type="ResourceLocationType" minOccurs = "0" />
@CharlieG021163 CharlieG021163 added ERDi Issues that need to be fixed in ERDi version High MESA Issues that need to be fixed in MISA Version labels Jan 23, 2020
@CharlieG021163 CharlieG021163 added this to the Discussed & Commented milestone Jan 23, 2020
@gerardmoloneyetpartners
Copy link
Collaborator

Agreed.
Lets give @terryrankine a run through before moving to 'Authorised for MESA submission' so he is also familiar.

@Dennis-Brandl
Copy link

Agreed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@terryrankine terryrankine

@gerardmoloneyetpartners gerardmoloneyetpartners

Labels
ERDi Issues that need to be fixed in ERDi version High MESA Issues that need to be fixed in MISA Version
Projects
None yet
Milestone
AcceptedByMESA
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@terryrankine @CharlieG021163 @Dennis-Brandl @gerardmoloneyetpartners