-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Keystone added to integrations #1760
Conversation
c49f5a7
to
67fa82e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nothing happens for me after connecting the KS by scanning, checking the checkbox, and hitting the Unlock button from the new Settings location. The screen persists.
One more detail to implement. Once the Keystone device is connected, we should have a different design for the Connect button, and it should not be clickable. |
I've updated the designs - added KS icon to Integrations row in settings screen & I hide the KS row in integrations screens. |
However the functionality works flawlessly for me 🤔 can u try to reproduce again? |
Author
Reviewer
Footnotes
Code often looks different when reviewing the diff in a browser, making it easier to spot potential bugs. ↩
While we aim for automated testing of the application, some aspects require manual testing. If you had to manually test something during development of this pull request, write those steps down. ↩
While we are not looking for perfect coverage, the tool can point out potential cases that have been missed. Code coverage can be generated with:
./gradlew check
for Kotlin modules and./gradlew connectedCheck -PIS_ANDROID_INSTRUMENTATION_TEST_COVERAGE_ENABLED=true
for Android modules. ↩Having your code up to date and squashed will make it easier for others to review. Use best judgement when squashing commits, as some changes (such as refactoring) might be easier to review as a separate commit. ↩
In addition to a first pass using the code review guidelines, do a second pass using your best judgement and experience which may identify additional questions or comments. Research shows that code review is most effective when done in multiple passes, where reviewers look for different things through each pass. ↩
While the CI server runs the app to look for build failures or crashes, humans running the app are more likely to notice unexpected log messages, UI inconsistencies, or bad output data. Perform this step last, after verifying the code changes are safe to run locally. ↩