Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: navigation bar color management #51956

Closed

Conversation

kirillzyusko
Copy link
Contributor

@kirillzyusko kirillzyusko commented Nov 4, 2024

Explanation of Change

Previously we didn't specify navigationBarColor at all. It was working well on some devices such as Pixel that manages navigationBarColor in a consistent way (on Pixel devices this navigationBar will be always dark, no matter which device theme is set).

However some device manufacturers are managing it differently, for example Samsung - they make navigationBar to match the color of the device theme (i. e. it will be white if device theme is "light", and will be black if device theme is "dark"). While it sounds pretty logical it produces conflicts in Expensify app: if device theme is "light" but user selected "dark" theme in Expensify app, then the app will be shown in dark mode, but navigation bar will be white. This is exactly what we got in: #51673

From above it's clear, that we should manage navigationBarColor inside the app and don't rely on default OS management as it may vary depending on manufacturers.

This is what this PR brings. Mainly it affects 3 areas (to match closely to iOS):

  • when splash screen is shown, then navigationBar color should match splash screen color (i. e. to be green);
  • login page should always have dark navigationBar (since this screen supports only dark theme);
  • when user is logged in, then we should manage navigationBar color depending on theme.

To achieve first item (and partially second) I changed styles.xml for SplashScreen theme and added default navigationBar color as #000.

To change color in runtime we need to use additional libs. Mainly I was considering two variants:

  • react-native-navigation-bar-color - was a pretty popular package back in times, but at the moment doesn't receive constant updates, popularity is moving down, most likely this package doesn't support Fabric/bridgeless mode etc.
  • expo-navigation-bar - offers extended API, has 40k weekly downloads (4x more popular than a previous lib), has Fabric support, constantly receives updates.

So the choice was pretty obvious - I chose expo-navigation-bar (we probably need to open an issue for new library).

Fixed Issues

$ #51673
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Perform tests at least on two platforms, for example Android 9 (old and popular) and Android 14 (new and popular).

  • open app and be sure navigation bar color is green
  • be sure login page is opened with dark navigation bar
  • login into app and be sure navigation bar has the same theme as main app
  • go to settings -> preferences -> theme and toggle all themes. Be sure that nav bar color is the same as main app
  • log out and be sure navigation bar color is dark

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Perform tests at least on two platforms, for example Android 9 (old and popular) and Android 14 (new and popular).

  • open app and be sure navigation bar color is green
  • be sure login page is opened with dark navigation bar
  • login into app and be sure navigation bar has the same theme as main app
  • go to settings -> preferences -> theme and toggle all themes. Be sure that nav bar color is the same as main app
  • log out and be sure navigation bar color is dark

Highly desirable to test at least one Samsung (new and popular) device. I tested on S21 Ultra with Android 14.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
telegram-cloud-document-2-5280970699148649310.mp4
Screen.Recording.2024-11-04.at.16.44.26.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari image
MacOS: Desktop image

@kirillzyusko kirillzyusko requested review from a team as code owners November 4, 2024 14:28
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from mananjadhav and removed request for a team November 4, 2024 14:28
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 4, 2024

@mananjadhav Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@kirillzyusko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Opened an issue with library review here: #51957

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
<item name="popupTheme">@style/AppTheme.Popup</item>
<item name="android:spinnerDropDownItemStyle">@style/TextViewSpinnerDropDownItem</item>
<item name="android:alertDialogTheme">@style/AlertDialogTheme</item>
<item name="android:navigationBarColor">@color/black</item>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious, at what point do we want black and why?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kirillzyusko can you confirm ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just by default to override all automatic OS color manipulations 🙃

But this color is used on login page - do you want to choose a different one?

telegram-cloud-photo-size-2-5280970699604879249-y

The reason why I decided that black is good enough is because below we have an illustration so monochromatic green color may look a little bit inconsistent.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah I got it. What do we use for the rest of the app when we are in dark mode?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shawnborton productDark100 which is #061B09. And in light mode we use produceLight100 which is #FCFBF9

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay @shawnborton
Let me re-work it and push new changes 👀

This is the diff between black and brand color:

Black productDark100
telegram-cloud-photo-size-2-5280970699604879414-y

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, I think productDark100 looks great personally - cc @Expensify/design for a gut check here, but I say let's do that instead of black.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm into it too!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same. Dig it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool, looks like everyone agree to use productDark100 - I pushed these changes, so this PR is ready for review then 😊

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure if you need a review from design or not but the video generally looks good to me. Pretty wild how slow the app seems though?

@kirillzyusko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pretty wild how slow the app seems though?

This is how the app runs on low end device in debug mode 🙈 In this case it's super slow 😅 But in release variant it's pretty fast for this old device!

Not sure if you need a review from design or not but the video generally looks good to me.

Well, if you can also download the app on Android and test it, then it would definitely help! ❤️

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@kirillzyusko most of the code looks good. Can you please check one of the pending author checklist item?

@kirillzyusko kirillzyusko force-pushed the fix/navigation-bar-management branch from dcfb3fe to d646e9a Compare November 4, 2024 15:28
@kirillzyusko
Copy link
Contributor Author

most of the code looks good. Can you please check one of the pending author checklist item?

@mananjadhav done 🙌

@kirillzyusko
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav would you mind to review this PR?

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Just finishing a deploy blocker and then getting to this.

@kirillzyusko kirillzyusko changed the title fix: navigation bar management fix: navigation bar color management Nov 7, 2024
@kirillzyusko
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav any updates here?..

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

I was able to test it on Android 13 but but not on Android 9. I tried my emulator keeps crashing.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-nav-bar-2.mov
android-nav-bar-1.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

Copy link
Collaborator

@mananjadhav mananjadhav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tested this in a few recent versions but couldn't test it on Android 9.

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

HOLDing this as we did not agree internally yet to use this library, instead, we would like to ideally just use only the piece of native code that handles the dynamic colours #51957 cc @jasperhuangg

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@kirillzyusko Should we put this PR on hold or close it as you will be able to reuse a lot of the code once edge-to-edge support is added?

@kirillzyusko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should we put this PR on hold or close it as you will be able to reuse a lot of the code once edge-to-edge support is added?

Let's close it in favour of #52392

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants