Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable copy action for travel details #58246

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gijoe0295
Copy link
Contributor

@gijoe0295 gijoe0295 commented Mar 11, 2025

Explanation of Change

Enable copy feature for travel details:

  • Confirmation number in car details
  • Flight code & Confirmation number in flight details
  • Address & Confirmation number in hotel details
  • Train code & Confirmation number in train details

Fixed Issues

$ #57800
PROPOSAL: #57800 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open a trip room
  2. Open hotel trip details
  3. Long press/Right click (Mobile/Desktop) the address field
  4. Verify context menu with Copy to clipboard item shows
  5. Press Copy to clipboard
  6. Verify the address value is copied to clipboard
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

None

QA Steps

  1. Open a trip room
  2. Open hotel trip details
  3. Long press/Right click (Mobile/Desktop) the address field
  4. Verify context menu with Copy to clipboard item shows
  5. Press Copy to clipboard
  6. Verify the address value is copied to clipboard
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-03-12.at.02.11.01.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-03-12.at.02.06.55.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-03-12.at.02.08.29.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-03-12.at.07.22.03-recording.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-03-12.at.02.07.32.mov

@gijoe0295 gijoe0295 marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2025 19:11
@gijoe0295 gijoe0295 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 11, 2025 19:11
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from dannymcclain and ntdiary and removed request for a team March 11, 2025 19:11
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 11, 2025

@dannymcclain @ntdiary One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

I think the videos are looking pretty good, but I'm having a hard time seeing the whole flow because the videos are pretty tightly cropped (time-wise). Would you mind uploading videos that show the entire flow more easily?

Some of these desktop options are looking pretty narrow - @Expensify/design do we have a minimum width we usually set for these? Lastly, we definitely don't want the menu item to change width once it changes from "Copy to clipboard" to "Copied".

CleanShot 2025-03-11 at 14 32 25@2x

CleanShot 2025-03-11 at 14 32 52@2x

CleanShot 2025-03-11 at 14 33 13@2x

@gijoe0295
Copy link
Contributor Author

Video for full flow:

Screen.Recording.2025-03-12.at.07.22.03-recording.mov

@gijoe0295
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lastly, we definitely don't want the menu item to change width once it changes from "Copy to clipboard" to "Copied".

@ntdiary Do you have any hint about retaining popover width even when the inner content changes? For report action context menu, because there're other menu items with larger width, when Copy to clipboard changes to Copied, popover width does not change. But in this case, we only have Copy to clipboard item.

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Some of these desktop options are looking pretty narrow - @Expensify/design do we have a minimum width we usually set for these? Lastly, we definitely don't want the menu item to change width once it changes from "Copy to clipboard" to "Copied".

Totally agree that we should have a min-width. When I made the component, the smallest one I found was 335px so maybe that? @shawnborton has a better idea maybe?

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

I don't know that we've established one - so I say let's make a new rule! What if we do something like 340px since it's divisible by 4? :)

But I definitely agree that having a min-width here would be nice to avoid the size jumping.

@ntdiary
Copy link
Contributor

ntdiary commented Mar 12, 2025

I don't know that we've established one - so I say let's make a new rule! What if we do something like 340px since it's divisible by 4? :)

But I definitely agree that having a min-width here would be nice to avoid the size jumping.

take some screenshots. BTW, we have a max-width 375 here :D

main branch (309.24px) 320px 340px
image image image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants