Check Sprint field in PR
#110
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Checks for current sprint based on start date and duration of iteration, reporting it in a custom field named `{IterationName}/IsCurrent` with Y/N.
`main_test` might have to be updated later as it will probably fail when a PR is made outside of current sprint period. This may not be necessary, depending on implementation of another issue.
For cases where "Sprint" field exists but not set, none is returned in projectFieldValue, hence it is necessary to check in projectField if there is any IterationField at all.
AlekSi
reviewed
Oct 26, 2022
AlekSi
reviewed
Oct 26, 2022
AlekSi
reviewed
Oct 27, 2022
AlekSi
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #45 .
Currently checks if
Sprintfield is set to current one if exists, not sure if necessary, as depending on implementation plan for #53, may be checking only if the title matches would suffice?