-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
including processes using excluded server list #1857
including processes using excluded server list #1857
Conversation
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think there is a way to add some additional checks in one of the e2e tests for this behaviour?
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code changes LGTM. Can you make sure to rebase on the current main branch to pull in all new changes and e2e tests.
Do you thing we should add any new/additional e2e tests for this change?
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
85ea897
to
95091f1
Compare
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
Result of fdb-kubernetes-operator-pr on Linux CentOS 7
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
Description
Updated the existing code to include processes using excluded server list.
Fixes: #1854
Type of change
Discussion
Are there any design details that you would like to discuss further?
N/A
Testing
Added unit tests
Documentation
N/A
Follow-up
N/A