Merge pull request #7 from GAEAlimited/patch-1

GAEA $uperChain Patch

EIPS/eip-2935.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: Serve historical block hashes from state
 description: Store and serve last 8192 block hashes as storage slots of a system contract to allow for stateless execution
 author: Vitalik Buterin (@vbuterin), Tomasz Stanczak (@tkstanczak), Guillaume Ballet (@gballet), Gajinder Singh (@g11tech), Tanishq Jasoria (@tanishqjasoria), Ignacio Hagopian (@jsign), Jochem Brouwer (@jochem-brouwer)
 discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-2935-save-historical-block-hashes-in-state/4565
-status: Draft
+status: Review
 type: Standards Track
 category: Core
 created: 2020-09-03
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ Since `BLOCKHASH` semantics doesn't change, this EIP has no impact on `BLOCKHASH
 
 ## Rationale
 
-Very similar ideas were proposed before in [EIP-210](./eip-210.md) et al. This EIP is a simplification, removing two sources of needless complexity:
+Very similar ideas were proposed before. This EIP is a simplification, removing two sources of needless complexity:
 
 1. Having a tree-like structure with multiple layers as opposed to a single list
 2. Writing the EIP in EVM code

EIPS/eip-5806.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 eip: 5806
 title: Delegate transaction
-description: Adds a new transaction type that allows a EOAs to execute arbitrary code through delegation
+description: Adds a new transaction type that allows EOAs to execute arbitrary code through delegation
 author: Hadrien Croubois (@Amxx)
 discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-5806-delegate-transaction/11409
 status: Draft

EIPS/eip-6110.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: Supply validator deposits on chain
 description: Provides validator deposits as a list of deposit operations added to the Execution Layer block
 author: Mikhail Kalinin (@mkalinin), Danny Ryan (@djrtwo), Peter Davies (@petertdavies)
 discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-6110-supply-validator-deposits-on-chain/12072
-status: Draft
+status: Review
 type: Standards Track
 category: Core
 created: 2022-12-09

EIPS/eip-6493.md

@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ class TransactionPayload(StableContainer[MAX_TRANSACTION_PAYLOAD_FIELDS]):
     gas: Optional[uint64]
     to: Optional[ExecutionAddress]
     value: Optional[uint256]
-    input_: ByteList[MAX_CALLDATA_SIZE]
+    input_: Optional[ByteList[MAX_CALLDATA_SIZE]]
 
     # EIP-2930
     access_list: Optional[List[AccessTuple, MAX_ACCESS_LIST_SIZE]]
@@ -147,6 +147,10 @@ class BlobFeesPerGas(Profile[FeesPerGas]):
     regular: FeePerGas
     blob: FeePerGas
 
+class EcdsaTransactionSignature(Profile[TransactionSignature]):
+    from_: Optional[ExecutionAddress]
+    ecdsa_signature: Optional[ByteVector[ECDSA_SIGNATURE_SIZE]]
+
 class ReplayableTransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
     type_: TransactionType
     nonce: uint64
@@ -158,7 +162,7 @@ class ReplayableTransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
 
 class ReplayableTransaction(Container):
     payload: ReplayableTransactionPayload
-    signature: TransactionSignature
+    signature: EcdsaTransactionSignature
 
 class LegacyTransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
     type_: TransactionType
@@ -172,7 +176,7 @@ class LegacyTransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
 
 class LegacyTransaction(Container):
     payload: LegacyTransactionPayload
-    signature: TransactionSignature
+    signature: EcdsaTransactionSignature
 
 class Eip2930TransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
     type_: TransactionType
@@ -187,7 +191,7 @@ class Eip2930TransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
 
 class Eip2930Transaction(Container):
     payload: Eip2930TransactionPayload
-    signature: TransactionSignature
+    signature: EcdsaTransactionSignature
 
 class Eip1559TransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
     type_: TransactionType
@@ -203,7 +207,7 @@ class Eip1559TransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
 
 class Eip1559Transaction(Container):
     payload: Eip1559TransactionPayload
-    signature: TransactionSignature
+    signature: EcdsaTransactionSignature
 
 class Eip4844TransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
     type_: TransactionType
@@ -220,7 +224,7 @@ class Eip4844TransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
 
 class Eip4844Transaction(Container):
     payload: Eip4844TransactionPayload
-    signature: TransactionSignature
+    signature: EcdsaTransactionSignature
 
 class BasicTransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
     chain_id: ChainId
@@ -235,7 +239,7 @@ class BasicTransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
 
 class BasicTransaction(Container):
     payload: BasicTransactionPayload
-    signature: TransactionSignature
+    signature: EcdsaTransactionSignature
 
 class BlobTransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
     chain_id: ChainId
@@ -251,36 +255,33 @@ class BlobTransactionPayload(Profile[TransactionPayload]):
 
 class BlobTransaction(Container):
     payload: BlobTransactionPayload
-    signature: TransactionSignature
+    signature: EcdsaTransactionSignature
 
-class AnyTransaction(OneOf[Transaction]):
-    @classmethod
-    def select_from_base(cls, value: Transaction) -> Type[Transaction]:
-        if value.payload.type_ is None:
-            if value.payload.blob_versioned_hashes is not None:
-                return BlobTransaction
-            return BasicTransaction
+def select_transaction_profile(cls, value: Transaction) -> Type[Profile]:
+    if value.payload.type_ is None:
+        if value.payload.blob_versioned_hashes is not None:
+            return BlobTransaction
+        return BasicTransaction
 
-        if value.payload.type_ == TRANSACTION_TYPE_EIP4844:
-            return Eip4844Transaction
+    if value.payload.type_ == TRANSACTION_TYPE_EIP4844:
+        return Eip4844Transaction
 
-        if value.payload.type_ == TRANSACTION_TYPE_EIP1559:
-            return Eip1559Transaction
+    if value.payload.type_ == TRANSACTION_TYPE_EIP1559:
+        return Eip1559Transaction
 
-        if value.payload.type_ == TRANSACTION_TYPE_EIP2930:
-            return Eip2930Transaction
+    if value.payload.type_ == TRANSACTION_TYPE_EIP2930:
+        return Eip2930Transaction
 
-        if value.payload.chain_id is not None:
-            return LegacyTransaction
+    if value.payload.chain_id is not None:
+        return LegacyTransaction
 
-        return ReplayableTransaction
+    return ReplayableTransaction
 ```
 
 Future specifications MAY:
 
 - Append fields to `TransactionPayload` and `TransactionSignature`
-- Convert existing fields to `Optional`
-- Define new `Profile` types and update `select_from_base` logic
+- Adjust `Profile` types and update `select_transaction_profile` logic
 
 Such changes [do not affect](./eip-7495.md) how existing transactions serialize or merkleize.
 
@@ -344,7 +345,7 @@ def ecdsa_recover_from_address(signature: ByteVector[ECDSA_SIGNATURE_SIZE],
     uncompressed = public_key.serialize(compressed=False)
     return ExecutionAddress(keccak(uncompressed[1:])[12:])
 
-def validate_transaction(tx: AnyTransaction):
+def validate_transaction(tx):
     ecdsa_validate_signature(tx.signature.ecdsa_signature)
     assert tx.signature.from_ == ecdsa_recover_from_address(
         tx.signature.ecdsa_signature,
@@ -401,10 +402,10 @@ class Log(Container):
 
 class Receipt(StableContainer[MAX_RECEIPT_FIELDS]):
     root: Optional[Hash32]
-    gas_used: uint64
+    gas_used: Optional[uint64]
     contract_address: Optional[ExecutionAddress]
-    logs_bloom: ByteVector[BYTES_PER_LOGS_BLOOM]
-    logs: List[Log, MAX_LOGS_PER_RECEIPT]
+    logs_bloom: Optional[ByteVector[BYTES_PER_LOGS_BLOOM]]
+    logs: Optional[List[Log, MAX_LOGS_PER_RECEIPT]]
 
     # EIP-658
     status: Optional[boolean]
@@ -427,20 +428,17 @@ class BasicReceipt(Profile[Receipt]):
     logs: List[Log, MAX_LOGS_PER_RECEIPT]
     status: boolean
 
-class AnyReceipt(OneOf[Receipt]):
-    @classmethod
-    def select_from_base(cls, value: Receipt) -> Type[Receipt]:
-        if value.status is not None:
-            return BasicReceipt
+def select_receipt_profile(value: Receipt) -> Type[Profile]:
+    if value.status is not None:
+        return BasicReceipt
 
-        return HomesteadReceipt
+    return HomesteadReceipt
 ```
 
 Future specifications MAY:
 
 - Add fields to the end of `Receipt`
-- Convert existing fields to `Optional`
-- Define new `Profile` types and update `select_from_base` logic
+- Adjust `Profile` types and update `select_receipt_profile` logic
 
 Such changes [do not affect](./eip-7495.md) how existing receipts serialize or merkleize.
 
@@ -539,7 +537,7 @@ If other SSZ objects are being signed in the future, e.g., messages, it must be
 
 ### What about EIP-2718 transaction types?
 
-All SSZ transactions (including future ones) share the single [EIP-2718](./eip-2718.md) transaction type `TRANSACTION_TYPE_SSZ`. Future features can introduce new optional fields as well as new allowed combination of optional fields, as determined by `select_from_base` in `AnyTransaction`.
+All SSZ transactions (including future ones) share the single [EIP-2718](./eip-2718.md) transaction type `TRANSACTION_TYPE_SSZ`. Future features can introduce new optional fields as well as new allowed combination of optional fields, as determined by `select_transaction_profile`.
 
 This also reduces combinatorial explosion; for example, the `access_list` property could be made optional for all SSZ transactions without having to double the number of defined transaction types.
 

EIPS/eip-7002.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: Execution layer triggerable withdrawals
 description: Allow validators to trigger exits and partial withdrawals via their execution layer (0x01) withdrawal credentials
 author: Danny Ryan (@djrtwo), Mikhail Kalinin (@mkalinin), Ansgar Dietrichs (@adietrichs), Hsiao-Wei Wang (@hwwhww), lightclient (@lightclient)
 discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-7002-execution-layer-triggerable-exits/14195
-status: Draft
+status: Review
 type: Standards Track
 category: Core
 created: 2023-05-09

EIPS/eip-7069.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: Revamped CALL instructions
 description: Introduce EXTCALL, EXTDELEGATECALL and EXTSTATICCALL with simplified semantics
 author: Alex Beregszaszi (@axic), Paweł Bylica (@chfast), Danno Ferrin (@shemnon), Andrei Maiboroda (@gumb0), Charles Cooper (@charles-cooper)
 discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-revamped-call-instructions/14432
-status: Draft
+status: Review
 type: Standards Track
 category: Core
 created: 2023-05-05
@@ -97,11 +97,11 @@ In case this EIP is included as part of the greater EOF upgrade, execution seman
 
 Execution of `RETURNDATACOPY` which is not in EOF formatted code (i.e. is in legacy code) is not changed.
 
-<!-- *TODO:* Clarify which side (caller/callee) is gas deducted from and where an error originates from. -->
+**TODO:** Clarify which side (caller/callee) is gas deducted from and where an error originates from.
 
-<!-- *TODO:* Mention gas refunds? -->
+**TODO:** Mention gas refunds?
 
-<!-- *TODO:* Consider option where non-calldata value transfer is not allowed, but there's a specific `TRANSFER`/`PAY` function for that. Would simplify the logic greatly. -->
+**TODO:** Consider option where non-calldata value transfer is not allowed, but there's a specific `TRANSFER`/`PAY` function for that. Would simplify the logic greatly.
 
 ## Rationale