-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 403
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Add topojson graph export rebase #1926
Draft
MichaelsJP
wants to merge
18
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
feat/add-topojson-graph-export-rebase
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…port This implements the first rough TopoJson objects to construct the coming TopoJson export endpoint.
includes pingtests in various permutations of faulty and correct input
Let's not add Lombok to existing classes. Only new ones for now. Hence, this fiel gets a typical setter.
Before the "coordinates" keyword was still serialized wrongly into the topojson structure creating a wrong arcs structure.
Reduce unnecessary duplication and streamline the export serialization with e.g. JsonExportResponse. The only difference is that it doesn't extent the ExportResponse. This is also not necessary. ExportResponse holds no value for the TopoJson export.
Layers is not necessary. It can be represented by a HashMap of layers where the key is the layer name. In our case "network".
MichaelsJP
force-pushed
the
feat/add-topojson-graph-export-rebase
branch
from
December 4, 2024 21:06
807ea6d
to
aff6244
Compare
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request Checklist
have been resolved.
[Unreleased] heading.
along with a short description of what it is for, and documented this in the Pull Request (below).
(at least Germany), and the graphs build without problems (i.e. no out-of-memory errors).
importer etc.), I have generated longer distance routes for the affected profiles with different options
(avoid features, max weight etc.) and compared these with the routes of the same parameters and start/end
points generated from the current live ORS.
If there are differences then the reasoning for these MUST be documented in the pull request.
and why the change was needed.
Fixes # .
Information about the changes
Examples and reasons for differences between live ORS routes, and those generated from this pull request
Required changes to ors config (if applicable)