-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/53 odds and ends #54
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## pre-release #54 +/- ##
============================================
Coverage 97.99% 97.99%
============================================
Files 17 17
Lines 299 299
Branches 51 47 -4
============================================
Hits 293 293
- Misses 2 3 +1
+ Partials 4 3 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chrisdicaprio this PR raised a few questions for me are we elevating more than we need to?? ... recall the work the Zoey / David did on the location_by_id function.
Maybe putting the some example docstrings to show how they're meant to be used will clarify this.
I have removed an import from the top level
and added an import of useful functions to the location/init.py
This allows the user to do:
but no longer allows
The intent is to elevate the user API to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @chrisdicaprio, looks great
closes #53