-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create MarkerCommands #8
Open
rakrakon
wants to merge
2
commits into
dev
Choose a base branch
from
feature/alert
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | ||
package frc.robot.lib | ||
|
||
import edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.Alert | ||
import edu.wpi.first.wpilibj.DataLogManager | ||
import edu.wpi.first.wpilibj2.command.Command | ||
import edu.wpi.first.wpilibj2.command.Commands | ||
|
||
const val ABNORMAL_EVENT_NAME = "PROBLEM!" | ||
val alert = Alert(ABNORMAL_EVENT_NAME, Alert.AlertType.kWarning) | ||
|
||
private fun markEvent(eventName: String): Command = Commands.runOnce({ | ||
DataLogManager.log(eventName) | ||
alert.set(true) | ||
}).withTimeout(5.0).andThen(Commands.runOnce({ | ||
alert.set(false) | ||
})) | ||
|
||
fun markAbnormalEvent(): Command = markEvent(ABNORMAL_EVENT_NAME) |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this just for logging purposes? If so, will an alert be shown to the drivers?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is for logging purposes. The driver calls this command when there's issues and it'll save the timestamp.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if it might distract the driver. Because we do want to use the alerts minimally so the drivers will actually look at them when critical errors happen.
Also, where is the timestamp saved?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we open the timestamp in advantagescope we can see when it exists and when it doesn't
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay. Still I'm not sure why you need this as an alert? Why is using
log()
not sufficient?If the problem is that multiple messages will overlap, you can just add the timestamp or an index number to the message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When we do it as alert we can make it show up in advantagescope. If we log it we'll have to search through the logs for when it happend.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm aware of the alert feature 🙂 but this is not the use case here, they should only be used to notify the drivers.