Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci, docker: Disaggregate Clang and LLVM versions, Clang 11, LLVM 10+11 #93

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 25, 2022

Conversation

langston-barrett
Copy link
Collaborator

Towards #12

@langston-barrett langston-barrett self-assigned this Oct 21, 2022
@langston-barrett langston-barrett changed the title ci, docker: Disaggregate Clang and LLVM versions, bump to Clang 11 ci, docker: Disaggregate Clang and LLVM versions Oct 21, 2022
@langston-barrett langston-barrett changed the title ci, docker: Disaggregate Clang and LLVM versions ci, docker: Disaggregate Clang and LLVM versions, use Clang 12 Oct 21, 2022
@langston-barrett langston-barrett changed the title ci, docker: Disaggregate Clang and LLVM versions, use Clang 12 ci, docker: Disaggregate Clang and LLVM versions, Clang 12, LLVM 10+11 Oct 21, 2022
@langston-barrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Oh whoops, the dev container needs a version of Clang that is no newer than the version of LLVM, since it compiles the C programs in the test suite... Or we could check in the LLVM IR files...

@langston-barrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think the right answer is to limit the version of Clang to that of the highest supported version of LLVM, and only run the golden tests when using the highest supported versions. That way, we keep just one copy of the golden tests and save on CI minutes.

@langston-barrett langston-barrett changed the title ci, docker: Disaggregate Clang and LLVM versions, Clang 12, LLVM 10+11 ci, docker: Disaggregate Clang and LLVM versions, Clang 11, LLVM 10+11 Oct 25, 2022
@langston-barrett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Well, after updating the golden tests for Clang+LLVM 11, there are a lot of changes... Will have to go through those manually to see if they're reasonable...

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@langston-barrett langston-barrett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've done a first pass on all the golden test file changes. Some are quite suspicious and need a further look. On files on which I didn't leave a comment, the comment on the file above it applies.

langston-barrett added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2022
This demonstrates a bug: These globals should have known size, but they don't.
See discussion on #93.
langston-barrett added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2022
This demonstrates a bug: These globals should have known size, but they don't.
See discussion on #93.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant