Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add CLI #59

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

feat: add CLI #59

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

jsstevenson
Copy link
Member

@jsstevenson jsstevenson commented Nov 30, 2024

This was something I'd fiddled with a long time ago on a local working branch, and finished up the other night because I was bored. I don't think it's necessarily mission-critical for any of our projects. but it's a small quality of life boost for me and could help with some automation stuff down the line.

@jsstevenson jsstevenson added the priority:low Low priority label Dec 1, 2024
@jsstevenson jsstevenson marked this pull request as ready for review December 1, 2024 15:45
@jsstevenson jsstevenson requested a review from korikuzma December 1, 2024 15:50
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should param/return be included in docstrings for modules in docs?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't been bothering too much with these dev-only methods (and tbh, we are more aggressive than almost everyone in requiring them in private methods in runnable code). We could maybe discuss in a future dev meeting?

@jsstevenson jsstevenson merged commit 673f2db into main Dec 10, 2024
18 checks passed
@jsstevenson jsstevenson deleted the add-cli branch December 10, 2024 19:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority:low Low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants