Add stellar into qf round #1835
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes encompass updates to various files, primarily focusing on database migrations, enhancements to donation handling, and adjustments to GraphQL queries and tests. Key modifications include the addition of new migration files that manage project banners and enforce unique project addresses for Stellar. Additionally, new functions and parameters have been introduced to improve the donation process and related queries, while test cases have been added or updated to ensure functionality and correctness. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Actionable comments posted: 31
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (24)
migration/1725188424424-UniqueProjectAdressWithMomoForStellar.ts (1)
3-5: Fix typo in class nameThere's a typo in the class name: "Adress" should be "Address".
Please apply the following change:
-export class UniqueProjectAdressWithMomoForStellar1725188424424 +export class UniqueProjectAddressWithMemoForStellar1725188424424 implements MigrationInterfacesrc/repositories/draftDonationRepository.ts (1)
72-80: LGTM! Consider adding error handling and documentation.The new
findDraftDonationByMatchedDonationIdfunction is well-implemented and follows good practices. It's concise, uses appropriate TypeScript types, and leverages the ORM effectively.To further improve the function:
- Consider adding error handling to be consistent with other functions in this file.
- Add a JSDoc comment to document the function's purpose and parameters.
Here's a suggested implementation with these improvements:
/** * Finds a draft donation by its matched donation ID. * @param matchedDonationId - The ID of the matched donation to search for. * @returns A Promise that resolves to the found DraftDonation or null if not found. */ export async function findDraftDonationByMatchedDonationId( matchedDonationId: number, ): Promise<DraftDonation | null> { try { return await DraftDonation.findOne({ where: { matchedDonationId, }, }); } catch (e) { logger.error( `Error in findDraftDonationByMatchedDonationId - matchedDonationId: ${matchedDonationId} - error: ${e.message}`, ); return null; } }This implementation adds error logging consistent with other functions in the file and includes a JSDoc comment for better documentation.
src/services/chains/index.ts (2)
63-67: LGTM: Updated timestamp validation logicThe modification to bypass the timestamp check for imported donations is well-implemented and clearly commented. This change aligns with the new
importedFromDraftOrBackupServiceproperty.Consider extracting the condition into a named variable for improved readability:
+ const shouldCheckTimestamp = !input.importedFromDraftOrBackupService; + - if ( - // We bypass checking tx and donation time for imported donations from backup service or draft donation - !input.importedFromDraftOrBackupService && - input.timestamp - transaction.timestamp > ONE_HOUR - ) { + if (shouldCheckTimestamp && input.timestamp - transaction.timestamp > ONE_HOUR) { // because we first create donation, then transaction will be mined, the transaction always should be greater than // donation created time, but we set one hour because maybe our server time is different with blockchain time server logger.debug( 'i18n.__(translationErrorMessagesKeys.TRANSACTION_CANT_BE_OLDER_THAN_DONATION)', { transaction, input, }, ); throw new Error( i18n.__( translationErrorMessagesKeys.TRANSACTION_CANT_BE_OLDER_THAN_DONATION, ), ); }This change would make the condition more explicit and easier to understand at a glance.
115-115: LGTM: Improved closeTo function implementationThe modification to use a ratio-based comparison in the
closeTofunction is a good improvement. This approach is more robust when comparing numbers of different magnitudes.Consider the following enhancements to make the function more robust and flexible:
- Add input validation to handle edge cases:
export const closeTo = (a: number, b: number, delta = 0.001): boolean => { if (!Number.isFinite(a) || !Number.isFinite(b)) { return false; } if (a === b) { return true; } if (b === 0) { return Math.abs(a) < delta; } return Math.abs(1 - a / b) < delta; };
- Add JSDoc comments to improve documentation:
/** * Checks if two numbers are close to each other within a specified relative tolerance. * @param a - The first number to compare. * @param b - The second number to compare. * @param delta - The relative tolerance (default is 0.001). * @returns True if the numbers are considered close, false otherwise. */ export const closeTo = (a: number, b: number, delta = 0.001): boolean => { // ... implementation ... };These changes would make the function more robust and self-documenting.
src/server/adminJs/tabs/tokenTab.ts (1)
214-225: LGTM: New Solana network entries added.The new entries for Solana networks (MAINNET, TESTNET, and DEVNET) are correctly added to the
availableValuesarray. This expands the functionality of the token tab to include Solana networks.For consistency with other network labels, consider using all uppercase for the Solana network labels:
- label: 'SOLANA MAINNET', + label: 'SOLANA MAINNET', - label: 'SOLANA TESTNET', + label: 'SOLANA TESTNET', - label: 'SOLANA DEVNET', + label: 'SOLANA DEVNET',src/server/adminJs/tabs/qfRoundTab.ts (1)
214-214: LGTM! Consider a minor formatting adjustment.The addition of the Stellar Mainnet to the
availableNetworkValuesarray is correct and aligns with the PR objective. The structure and naming convention are consistent with other entries.For consistency with other multi-word labels in the array, consider adding parentheses around "Mainnet":
- { value: NETWORK_IDS.STELLAR_MAINNET, label: 'STELLAR MAINNET'}, + { value: NETWORK_IDS.STELLAR_MAINNET, label: 'STELLAR (MAINNET)'},src/services/donationService.ts (2)
232-233: LGTM: New functionality to find relevant draft donation.The addition of
relevantDraftDonationenhances the function by incorporating draft donation data. This is a good improvement to the donation synchronization process.Consider adding error handling for the
findDraftDonationByMatchedDonationIdcall to gracefully handle any potential errors during the asynchronous operation.You might want to add a try-catch block around the
findDraftDonationByMatchedDonationIdcall:let relevantDraftDonation; try { relevantDraftDonation = await findDraftDonationByMatchedDonationId(donationId); } catch (error) { logger.error('Error finding draft donation', { error, donationId }); // Decide how to proceed if finding the draft donation fails }
267-269: LGTM: Added context for imported donations.The new
importedFromDraftOrBackupServiceproperty provides valuable information about the donation's origin to thegetTransactionInfoFromNetworkfunction. This addition improves the context available during transaction processing.To enhance readability, consider extracting the boolean logic into a separate variable with a descriptive name.
You could improve code readability by extracting the boolean logic:
const isImportedDonation = Boolean(donation.importDate || relevantDraftDonation); // ... importedFromDraftOrBackupService: isImportedDonation,This makes the code more self-documenting and easier to understand at a glance.
src/services/chains/index.test.ts (1)
1068-1079: Modifications tocloseTotest cases are appropriate, but could use more contextThe changes to the existing test cases and the addition of a new test case for the
closeTofunction look good. They provide better coverage and seem to align with updated expectations for the function's behavior.However, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining the reasoning behind these changes, especially for the modified assertions.
Consider adding a brief comment above these test cases explaining why the behavior of
closeTohas changed for smaller numbers but remains the same for larger numbers. This will help future developers understand the intent behind these modifications.test/graphqlQueries.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-2266: File structure and organization are maintained.The addition of the
allocatedGivbacksQuerymaintains the overall structure and organization of the file. The file continues to be a well-organized collection of GraphQL queries and mutations, which is good for maintainability.Consider adding a table of contents or grouping comments to help navigate this large file, as it contains numerous queries and mutations.
src/resolvers/projectResolver.allProject.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1824: Consider reviewing test coverage for new scenarios.The test file provides comprehensive coverage for various filtering, sorting, and pagination scenarios. With the recent additions of new networks and criteria, it would be beneficial to review the test suite to ensure all edge cases are covered.
Consider the following suggestions:
- Review if there are any new edge cases introduced by the inclusion of SEPOLIA in the mainnet filter that need specific tests.
- Ensure there are sufficient tests for scenarios involving multiple network filters simultaneously.
- Consider adding tests for error cases, such as invalid network IDs or conflicting filter combinations.
These additions would further strengthen the robustness of the test suite.
src/resolvers/projectResolver.test.ts (3)
Line range hint
12-179: Consider splitting this test file for better maintainability.While the imports themselves are correct, the large number of imports suggests that this test file might be covering too many areas. Consider splitting it into smaller, more focused test files. This would improve maintainability and make it easier to locate and run specific tests.
Line range hint
180-216: Address TODO and implement missing test cases.There are several commented-out test cases and a TODO comment indicating incomplete test coverage. Consider implementing these missing test cases to ensure comprehensive testing of all queries and mutations.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of these missing test cases?
Line range hint
218-264: Enhance date range test for projectsPerDate.The test case for projectsPerDate is well-structured and covers the basic functionality. However, it could be improved by adding assertions to verify that the returned projects' creation dates actually fall within the specified date range. This would ensure that the query is correctly filtering projects based on the date parameters.
Consider adding the following assertions after the existing checks:
const projects = projectsResponse.data.data.projectsPerDate.projects; projects.forEach(project => { const projectDate = new Date(project.creationDate); assert.isTrue(projectDate >= new Date(variables.fromDate)); assert.isTrue(projectDate <= new Date(variables.toDate)); });migration/1724368995904-add_banner_endaoment_projects.ts (1)
61-62: Use a proper logging mechanism instead ofconsole.logUsing
console.logis not recommended in production code. Consider using a logging library to handle logs more effectively.migration/1726377580626-add_sponser_donations_to_givback_round_70.ts (3)
56-56: Replace 'console.log' with a structured logging mechanismUsing
console.logfor logging at lines 56 and 68 is not recommended in production code. It bypasses configured logging levels and formats, making log management and monitoring more difficult.Consider using a logging library like
winstonor the application's existing logging utility:import logger from '../src/logger'; // Replace console.log with: logger.info('We just want to create these donations in production DB');And similarly at line 68.
Also applies to: 68-68
20-22: Remove unnecessary 'millisecondTimestampToDate' functionThe function
millisecondTimestampToDatesimply wrapsnew Date(timestamp)without adding significant value. You can usenew Date(timestamp)directly where needed.Unless there is a specific reason to keep this helper function, consider removing it for conciseness.
-const millisecondTimestampToDate = (timestamp: number): Date => { - return new Date(timestamp); -}; ... - createdAt: millisecondTimestampToDate(1725354026000), + createdAt: new Date(1725354026000),
79-79: Clarify comment regarding GIVbacks eligibilityThe comment on line 79 could be more precise. It's crucial to maintain clear documentation, especially when dealing with financial transactions like GIVbacks.
Consider rephrasing for clarity:
-// Set true for isTokenEligibleForGivback, isProjectVerified because Ashley mentioned we want to pay givback for them +// Set 'isTokenEligibleForGivback' and 'isProjectVerified' to true to ensure GIVbacks are issued for these donations, as per Ashley's instructions.src/utils/validators/projectValidator.ts (1)
47-55: Review the conditional error handling logicThe added conditional block checks if
chainType === ChainType.STELLAR && memo, and throws a specific error message if true. Otherwise, it throws a general error message.
- Verify that the logic accurately reflects the intended behavior for Stellar addresses with memos.
- Ensure that the error messages are clear and user-friendly.
Consider enhancing the error messages for clarity:
-`Address ${walletAddress} is already being used for a project with the same MEMO. Please enter a different address or a different MEMO` +`The Stellar address ${walletAddress} with memo "${memo}" is already associated with another project. Please use a different address or memo.` -`Address ${walletAddress} is already being used for a project` +`The address ${walletAddress} is already associated with another project.`src/repositories/donationRepository.ts (1)
485-523: Consider adding database indexes to improve query performance.The SQL query in
getSumOfGivbackEligibleDonationsForSpecificRoundinvolves multiple conditions and a subquery, which could impact performance on large datasets. Adding indexes on frequently queried columns like"status","isProjectVerified","powerRound", and"fromWalletAddress"may enhance query performance.src/resolvers/donationResolver.ts (1)
95-95: Instance-level caching may lead to inconsistencies in a distributed system.Storing
allocatedGivbacksCacheat the instance level can cause inconsistent behavior when running multiple instances of the application (e.g., in a load-balanced environment). Each instance will maintain its own cache, leading to potential discrepancies in the data returned to clients.Consider using a distributed caching solution like Redis or an in-memory cache with shared state to synchronize the cache across all instances.
src/repositories/donationRepository.test.ts (2)
1465-1466: Add a descriptive comment for the test suite function.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
getSumOfGivbackEligibleDonationsForSpecificRoundTestCasesfunction to enhance readability and maintainability.
1468-1754: Use descriptive constants forpowerRoundvalues.Numeric values are directly assigned to the
powerRoundvariable (e.g.,powerRound = 3232;). To improve code readability, consider defining these values as constants with meaningful names.src/services/cronJobs/checkQRTransactionJob.ts (1)
28-33: Remove unnecessaryawaitinreturnstatementIn the
getPendingDraftDonationsfunction, usingreturn awaitis redundant since the function is alreadyasync. You can return the promise directly.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
-const getPendingDraftDonations = async () => { - return await DraftDonation.createQueryBuilder('draftDonation') +const getPendingDraftDonations = async () => { + return DraftDonation.createQueryBuilder('draftDonation') .where('draftDonation.status = :status', { status: 'pending' }) .andWhere('draftDonation.isQRDonation = true') .getMany(); -}; +};
Comments failed to post (31)
src/repositories/draftDonationRepository.ts (1)
72-80: 💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent error handling detected.
The exported async functions in
draftDonationRepository.tsexhibit inconsistent error handling:
markDraftDonationStatusMatchedincludes a try-catch block.findDraftDonationByMatchedDonationIdlacks a try-catch block.For consistency and improved error management, consider standardizing the error handling approach across all exported async functions.
- Option A: Add try-catch blocks with appropriate error logging to all exported async functions.
- Option B: Remove try-catch blocks from all functions and handle errors at a higher level.
Analysis chain
Consider usage context and error handling consistency.
The new
findDraftDonationByMatchedDonationIdfunction is a valuable addition to the repository. It complements existing functionality and adheres to the established patterns in this file.However, consider the following points:
Usage Context: It would be helpful to understand where and how this function will be used. Consider adding a brief comment explaining its intended use case.
Error Handling Consistency: The error handling approach in this function differs slightly from others in the file (e.g.,
markDraftDonationStatusMatched). For consistency, consider either:
a) Adding similar try-catch blocks with error logging to all functions, or
b) Removing try-catch blocks from all functions and handling errors at a higher level.To ensure consistent usage of error handling across the file, you can run the following command:
This script will help identify if there's a mix of error handling approaches in the file.
</details> <details> <summary>Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent error handling in exported functions # Test: Count the number of exported functions with and without try-catch blocks with_try_catch=$(rg --type typescript '^\s*export\s+async\s+function.*\{.*try\s*\{' src/repositories/draftDonationRepository.ts | wc -l) without_try_catch=$(rg --type typescript '^\s*export\s+async\s+function.*\{(?!.*try\s*\{)' src/repositories/draftDonationRepository.ts | wc -l) echo "Functions with try-catch: $with_try_catch" echo "Functions without try-catch: $without_try_catch" if [ "$with_try_catch" -ne 0 ] && [ "$without_try_catch" -ne 0 ]; then echo "Inconsistent error handling detected. Consider standardizing the approach." else echo "Error handling appears to be consistent." fiLength of output: 854
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent error handling in exported async functions using ast-grep # Extract all exported async functions exported_functions=$(ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export async function $_($_): Promise<$_> { $$$ }' src/repositories/draftDonationRepository.ts) # Initialize counters with_try_catch=0 without_try_catch=0 # Iterate over each exported function to check for try-catch blocks echo "$exported_functions" | while read -r function; do # Check if the function contains a try-catch block if echo "$function" | grep -q "try {"; then with_try_catch=$((with_try_catch + 1)) else without_try_catch=$((without_try_catch + 1)) fi done echo "Functions with try-catch: $with_try_catch" echo "Functions without try-catch: $without_try_catch" if [ "$with_try_catch" -ne 0 ] && [ "$without_try_catch" -ne 0 ]; then echo "Inconsistent error handling detected. Consider standardizing the approach." else echo "Error handling appears to be consistent." fiLength of output: 13206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent error handling in exported async functions using ast-grep # Extract all exported async functions exported_functions=$(ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export async function $_($_): Promise<$_> { $$$ }' src/repositories/draftDonationRepository.ts) # Initialize counters with_try_catch=0 without_try_catch=0 # Split the functions by the closing brace of each function IFS=$'\n}' read -rd '' -a functions <<< "$exported_functions" # Iterate over each function to check for try-catch blocks for func in "${functions[@]}"; do if echo "$func" | grep -q "try {"; then with_try_catch=$((with_try_catch + 1)) elif [[ -n "$func" ]]; then without_try_catch=$((without_try_catch + 1)) fi done echo "Functions with try-catch: $with_try_catch" echo "Functions without try-catch: $without_try_catch" if [ "$with_try_catch" -ne 0 ] && [ "$without_try_catch" -ne 0 ]; then echo "Inconsistent error handling detected. Consider standardizing the approach." else echo "Error handling appears to be consistent." fiLength of output: 15162
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent error handling in exported async functions using ast-grep # Extract all exported async functions all_functions=$(ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export async function $_($_): Promise<$_> { $$$ }' src/repositories/draftDonationRepository.ts) # Extract exported async functions that contain a try-catch block functions_with_try=$(ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export async function $_($_): Promise<$_> { try { $$$ } catch (e) { $$$ } $$$ }' src/repositories/draftDonationRepository.ts) # Count total exported async functions total_functions=$(echo "$all_functions" | grep -c 'export async function') # Count exported async functions with try-catch total_with_try=$(echo "$functions_with_try" | grep -c 'export async function') # Calculate functions without try-catch total_without_try=$((total_functions - total_with_try)) echo "Total exported async functions: $total_functions" echo "Functions with try-catch: $total_with_try" echo "Functions without try-catch: $total_without_try" if [ "$total_with_try" -ne "$total_functions" ] && [ "$total_without_try" -ne "$total_functions" ]; then echo "Inconsistent error handling detected. Consider standardizing the approach." else echo "Error handling appears to be consistent." fiLength of output: 12399
src/server/adminJs/tabs/tokenTab.ts (1)
241-248: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
LGTM: New chainType property added.
The
chainTypeproperty is correctly implemented with appropriateavailableValuesfor EVM, SOLANA, and STELLAR. This addition enhances the token categorization based on the underlying blockchain technology and aligns with the PR objective of adding Stellar support.Consider using an enum or constant for the chain type values to improve maintainability and reduce the risk of typos:
const CHAIN_TYPES = { EVM: 'EVM', SOLANA: 'SOLANA', STELLAR: 'STELLAR', } as const; // Then in the availableValues array: availableValues: Object.entries(CHAIN_TYPES).map(([key, value]) => ({ value, label: key, })),This approach would make it easier to add new chain types in the future and ensure consistency throughout the codebase.
src/resolvers/draftDonationResolver.test.ts (1)
558-559: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueMultiple skipped tests detected in
draftDonationResolver.test.tsThe test file
src/resolvers/draftDonationResolver.test.tscontains the following skipped tests:
should return the same draft recurring donation id if the same donation is created twiceshould renew the expiration date of the draft donationSkipping tests can lead to reduced test coverage and potential bugs going unnoticed.
Consider the following improvements:
Provide Detailed Explanations: Update the TODO comments for each skipped test to explain why they are skipped and what needs to be addressed.
// TODO: Fix this test (JIRA-1234). It's currently failing due to [specific reason]. // Assigned to Meriem. Target resolution by [date].Add Ticket References or Timelines: Include references to relevant tickets or set deadlines to ensure that these tests are revisited and resolved in a timely manner.
Avoid Skipping Tests When Possible: If feasible, address the reasons causing the tests to fail instead of skipping them to maintain comprehensive test coverage.
Analysis chain
Avoid skipping tests without proper documentation
The test case for renewing the expiration date of draft donations has been skipped without a clear explanation. Skipping tests can lead to reduced test coverage and potential bugs going unnoticed.
Consider the following improvements:
- Provide a more detailed explanation in the TODO comment about why the test is being skipped and what specifically needs to be fixed.
- Add a ticket reference or timeline for when this test will be addressed.
- If possible, fix the test now instead of skipping it to maintain test coverage.
Example of a more informative TODO comment:
// TODO: Fix this test (JIRA-1234). It's currently failing due to [specific reason]. // Meriem to address by [date].To ensure this is the only skipped test in the file, run the following command:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any skipped tests in the file rg --type typescript 'it\.skip' src/resolvers/draftDonationResolver.test.tsLength of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any skipped tests in the TypeScript test file rg 'it\.skip' src/resolvers/draftDonationResolver.test.tsLength of output: 257
test/graphqlQueries.ts (1)
2252-2266: 💡 Codebase verification
Backend schema does not support
allocatedGivbacksquery and it's unused in frontend.
- The
allocatedGivbacksquery is not found in the backend GraphQL schema.- Frontend references to
allocatedGivbacksQueryexist only in test files and are not utilized in the actual application code.Please ensure that the backend schema includes the
allocatedGivbacksquery and that the frontend components are updated to use it appropriately.Analysis chain
Verify backend support and frontend usage.
While the new
allocatedGivbacksQueryis well-structured, it's important to ensure:
- The backend GraphQL schema supports this new query and can handle the
refreshCacheparameter.- The frontend components are updated to use this new query where appropriate.
Could you confirm that these aspects have been addressed in the corresponding backend and frontend changes?
[/run_scripts]
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for backend schema updates and frontend usage of the new query # Test 1: Check if the backend schema has been updated echo "Checking backend schema for allocatedGivbacks query:" rg --type graphql "type Query" -A 20 | rg "allocatedGivbacks" # Test 2: Check for frontend usage of the new query echo "Checking frontend usage of allocatedGivbacksQuery:" rg "allocatedGivbacksQuery" --type typescript --type javascriptLength of output: 418
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for backend schema updates and frontend usage of the new query using file extensions # Test 1: Check if the backend schema has been updated echo "Checking backend schema for allocatedGivbacks query in .graphql and .gql files:" fd --extension graphql --extension gq | xargs rg "type Query" -A 20 | rg "allocatedGivbacks" # Test 2: Check for frontend usage of allocatedGivbacksQuery in .ts, .tsx, .js, and .jsx files echo "Checking frontend usage of allocatedGivbacksQuery in TypeScript and JavaScript files:" fd --extension ts --extension tsx --extension js --extension jsx | xargs rg "allocatedGivbacksQuery"Length of output: 1227
test/testUtils.ts (1)
276-291: 💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Update Affected Test Files
The following test files use the
saveProjectDirectlyToDbfunction or have hardcodedChainType.EVMand may need updates to accommodate recent changes:
test/pre-test-scripts.tstest/testUtils.tsPlease update these tests to handle the dynamic determination of
chainTypeand ensure they remain consistent with the updated implementation.Analysis chain
LGTM! Consider verifying the impact on existing tests.
The changes to
saveProjectDirectlyToDbfunction look good. The introduction ofSolanaNetworkIdsand dynamicchainTypedetermination improves the flexibility of the function by supporting Solana chain types.To ensure these changes don't break existing functionality, please run the following script:
Shell Script Correction Needed
The previous verification script encountered an error. Please run the following corrected script to check for any test files that might need updates due to the changes in the
saveProjectDirectlyToDbfunction:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any test files that might need updates due to the changes in saveProjectDirectlyToDb function # Search for test files that use saveProjectDirectlyToDb echo "Test files potentially affected by changes in saveProjectDirectlyToDb:" grep -R "saveProjectDirectlyToDb" test/ # Search for any hardcoded ChainType.EVM in test files echo "\nTest files with hardcoded ChainType.EVM that might need updates:" grep -R "ChainType.EVM" test/Length of output: 19650
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any test files that might need updates due to the changes in saveProjectDirectlyToDb function # Search for test files that use saveProjectDirectlyToDb echo "Test files potentially affected by changes in saveProjectDirectlyToDb:" grep -R "saveProjectDirectlyToDb" test/ # Search for any hardcoded ChainType.EVM in test files echo -e "\nTest files with hardcoded ChainType.EVM that might need updates:" grep -R "ChainType.EVM" test/Length of output: 1271
src/resolvers/projectResolver.ts (1)
1789-1795: 💡 Codebase verification
Potential Issue Detected: Update Required for
walletAddressIsValidCallsThe call to
walletAddressIsValidintest/graphqlQueries.tsis missing the newchainTypeandmemoparameters.
test/graphqlQueries.ts: walletAddressIsValid(address: $address)Please update this call to include the new parameters to ensure compatibility with the updated method signature.
Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify impact on existing code.
The addition of
chainTypeandmemoparameters to thewalletAddressIsValidmethod enhances its flexibility for different blockchain types. This is a good improvement that allows for more comprehensive wallet address validation.To ensure this change doesn't break existing functionality, please run the following script to check for any calls to
walletAddressIsValidthat might need updating:
To resolve the error with the previous script, please run the following corrected script to find all calls to
walletAddressIsValid:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to walletAddressIsValid and verify if they need updating # Search for calls to walletAddressIsValid rg --type typescript -e 'walletAddressIsValid\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to walletAddressIsValid and verify if they need updating # Search for calls to walletAddressIsValid in TypeScript files rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -e 'walletAddressIsValid\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 533
migration/1724368995904-add_banner_endaoment_projects.ts (4)
47-47:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the typo in 'Registred Non-profits'
There's a typo in the key
'Registred Non-profits'; it should be'Registered Non-profits'.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- 'Registred Non-profits': 'non-profit', + 'Registered Non-profits': 'non-profit',Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.'Registered Non-profits': 'non-profit',
67-79: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Move
getCategoryNamesfunction definition outside the loopDefining the
getCategoryNamesfunction inside the loop causes it to be redefined on every iteration, which is inefficient. Move the function definition outside the loop to improve performance and readability.Apply this diff to move the function definition:
+ // Move the function definition before the loop + const getCategoryNames = (nteeCode: string): string[] => { + const mapping = endaomentProjectCategoryMapping.find( + category => category.nteeCode === nteeCode, + ); + return mapping + ? [ + mapping.category1, + mapping.category2, + mapping.category3 || '', + mapping.category4 || '', + ].filter(Boolean) + : []; + }; for (const project of endaomentProjects) { - const getCategoryNames = (nteeCode: string): string[] => { - const mapping = endaomentProjectCategoryMapping.find( - category => category.nteeCode === nteeCode, - ); - return mapping - ? [ - mapping.category1, - mapping.category2, - mapping.category3 || '', - mapping.category4 || '', - ].filter(Boolean) - : []; - }; // Rest of the loop body...Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
86-86:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential undefined
categoryNames[1]to avoid runtime errorsAccessing
categoryNames[1]may result inundefinedif there are fewer than two categories returned. This could lead to an incorrectbannerImagepath. Ensure thatcategoryNames[1]exists before using it.Apply this diff to handle missing categories:
- const bannerImage = `/images/defaultProjectImages/${imageCategoryMapping[categoryNames[1]] || '1'}.png`; + const categoryKey = categoryNames[1] || categoryNames[0] || '1'; + const bannerImage = `/images/defaultProjectImages/${imageCategoryMapping[categoryKey] || '1'}.png`;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const categoryKey = categoryNames[1] || categoryNames[0] || '1'; const bannerImage = `/images/defaultProjectImages/${imageCategoryMapping[categoryKey] || '1'}.png`;
98-100:
⚠️ Potential issueImplement a rollback mechanism in the
downmethodThe
downmethod is currently empty, which means this migration cannot be rolled back. Implementing thedownmethod is important for reversing changes made by theupmethod, ensuring database integrity.Consider resetting the
imagefield to its previous value or setting it toNULLin thedownmethod.public async down(queryRunner: QueryRunner): Promise<void> { - // No down migration + await queryRunner.query(`UPDATE project SET image = NULL WHERE image LIKE '/images/defaultProjectImages/%'`); }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
migration/1726377580626-add_sponser_donations_to_givback_round_70.ts (6)
63-65:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent SQL injection by using parameterized queries
The query at lines 63-65 interpolates user input directly into the SQL statement, which can lead to SQL injection vulnerabilities. Use parameterized queries to ensure that inputs are properly escaped.
Refactor the query to use parameterized parameters:
let user = ( await queryRunner.query( `SELECT * FROM public.user WHERE lower("walletAddress") = lower($1)`, [tx.donorAddress] ) )[0];
70-76:
⚠️ Potential issueUse parameterized queries for INSERT statement to enhance security
The INSERT statement at lines 70-76 directly includes user-provided values, posing a risk of SQL injection. Utilize parameterized queries to securely insert data into the database.
Refactor the INSERT query as follows:
await queryRunner.query( ` INSERT INTO public.user ("walletAddress", role, "loginType", name) VALUES (lower($1), 'restricted', 'wallet', $2) ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING; `, [tx.donorAddress, tx.donorName] );
88-97:
⚠️ Potential issueSecure the INSERT INTO 'donation' statement with parameterized queries
The INSERT statement at lines 88-97 directly interpolates variables into the SQL query, which can lead to SQL injection attacks. Replace string interpolation with parameterized queries to enhance security.
Refactor the INSERT query to use parameters:
await queryRunner.query( ` INSERT INTO donation ( "toWalletAddress", "projectId", "fromWalletAddress", "userId", amount, currency, "transactionId", "transactionNetworkId", anonymous, "valueUsd", status, "segmentNotified", "isTokenEligibleForGivback", "isProjectVerified", "createdAt", "givbackFactor", "powerRound", "projectRank", "bottomRankInRound", "qfRoundId", "tokenAddress" ) VALUES ( lower($1), $2, lower($3), $4, $5, $6, lower($7), $8, false, $9, 'verified', true, true, true, $10, $11, $12, $13, $14, $15, $16 ) ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING; `, [ tx.toWalletAddress, tx.projectId, tx.fromWalletAddress, user.id, tx.amount, tx.currency, tx.transactionId, tx.transactionNetworkId, tx.valueUsd, createdAt, givbackFactor, powerRound, projectRank, bottomRankInRound, tx.qfRoundId || null, tx.tokenAddress ] );
108-109: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement the 'down' method for proper migration rollback
The
downmethod is currently empty, meaning this migration cannot be rolled back. Implementing thedownmethod ensures that changes can be reverted if necessary, aiding in database maintainability.Consider adding logic to reverse the changes made in the
upmethod, such as deleting the inserted donations and any newly created users.
48-50:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the typo in 'Sponser' to 'Sponsor' in class name and filename
The word "Sponsor" is misspelled as "Sponser" in both the class name
AddSponserDonationsToGivbackRound701726377580626and the filename1726377580626-add_sponser_donations_to_givback_round_70.ts. Correcting this will improve code readability and maintain consistency.Apply this diff to fix the typo in the class name:
-export class AddSponserDonationsToGivbackRound701726377580626 +export class AddSponsorDonationsToGivbackRound701726377580626Rename the file to:
1726377580626-add_sponsor_donations_to_givback_round_70.tsCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export class AddSponsorDonationsToGivbackRound701726377580626 implements MigrationInterface {
54-58: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Allow migration to run in non-production environments for testing
The migration is currently set to run only in the production environment. This prevents testing and validating the migration in development or staging environments, which is crucial for identifying potential issues before deployment.
Modify the condition to allow the migration to run in non-production environments, or provide a mechanism to enable testing when required.
-if (environment !== 'production') { +if (environment === 'production' || process.env.ALLOW_MIGRATION_IN_DEV) {You can set
ALLOW_MIGRATION_IN_DEVtotruein your development environment when you need to test the migration.Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (environment === 'production' || process.env.ALLOW_MIGRATION_IN_DEV) { // eslint-disable-next-line no-console console.log('We just want to create these donations in production DB'); return; }src/repositories/projectAddressRepository.ts (2)
54-71:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential Issue with Handling Empty Strings for
memoParameterThe current condition
if (memo)treats an empty string ('') as falsy. If an empty string is a validmemovalue for Stellar transactions, this could lead to incorrect query results, as the code would incorrectly treatmemoas not provided.Consider changing the condition to explicitly check for
memo !== undefined && memo !== nullto correctly handle empty strings.Apply this diff to fix the condition:
- if (memo) { + if (memo !== undefined && memo !== null) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// If a memo is provided, check for both address and memo if (memo !== undefined && memo !== null) { query = query.where( 'UPPER(address) = :walletAddress AND memo = :memo', { walletAddress: walletAddress.toUpperCase(), memo, }, ); } else { // If no memo is provided, check only the address query = query.where( 'UPPER(address) = :walletAddress AND memo IS NULL', { walletAddress: walletAddress.toUpperCase(), }, ); }
43-44: 💡 Codebase verification
Some calls to
findRelatedAddressByWalletAddressare missing the optionalmemoparameter required for Stellar addresses. Please update these call sites to include thememoparameter where necessary:
- test/testUtils.ts
- src/utils/validators/projectValidator.ts
- src/repositories/projectAddressRepository.test.ts
- migration/1680507337701-add_some_donations_to_db.ts
Analysis chain
Ensure All Calls to Updated Function Include the Optional
memoParameterThe function
findRelatedAddressByWalletAddressnow accepts an optionalmemo?: stringparameter. Please verify that all calls to this function in the codebase have been updated accordingly, and that thememoparameter is provided where necessary for Stellar addresses.Run the following script to find all usages of
findRelatedAddressByWalletAddress:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all call sites of `findRelatedAddressByWalletAddress` to ensure correct usage. # Expected: Review each call to ensure it handles the `memo` parameter appropriately. rg --type ts 'findRelatedAddressByWalletAddress\(' -A 2 -B 2Length of output: 2434
src/utils/validators/projectValidator.ts (2)
44-44:
⚠️ Potential issueConfirm
findRelatedAddressByWalletAddressaccepts thememoparameterThe function
findRelatedAddressByWalletAddressis now called with an additionalmemoargument. Ensure that this function's definition has been updated to accept thememoparameter and that it handles it correctly.If
findRelatedAddressByWalletAddressdoes not acceptmemoas a parameter, this could lead to unexpected behavior or runtime errors. Please confirm that its signature and implementation have been updated accordingly.
26-26: 💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Update Function Calls to Include
memoParameterSeveral calls to
validateProjectWalletAddressare missing thememoparameter:
src/utils/validators/projectValidator.tssrc/utils/validators/projectValidator.test.tsPlease update these calls to include the
memoparameter and ensure the function handles cases wherememois undefined appropriately.Analysis chain
Ensure all function calls include the new
memoparameterThe
validateProjectWalletAddressfunction now includes an optionalmemo?: stringparameter. Please verify that all calls to this function throughout the codebase have been updated to include thememoparameter where necessary, and that the function correctly handles cases wherememois undefined.You can run the following script to find all usages of the function:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to `validateProjectWalletAddress` and check for the `memo` parameter. # Test: Search for function calls. Expect: All calls should handle the `memo` parameter appropriately. rg --type ts 'validateProjectWalletAddress\(' -A 2Length of output: 3412
src/repositories/donationRepository.ts (2)
501-501:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle possible NULL values in 'valueUsd' and 'givbackFactor'.
In the SQL query, the calculation
SUM("donation"."valueUsd" * "donation"."givbackFactor")may result inNULLif eithervalueUsdorgivbackFactorisNULL, potentially leading to inaccurate totals. Consider usingCOALESCEto handleNULLvalues and ensure accurate aggregation.Apply this diff to handle
NULLvalues:- SELECT - SUM("donation"."valueUsd" * "donation"."givbackFactor") AS "totalUsdWithGivbackFactor" + SELECT + SUM(COALESCE("donation"."valueUsd", 0) * COALESCE("donation"."givbackFactor", 0)) AS "totalUsdWithGivbackFactor"Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.SUM(COALESCE("donation"."valueUsd", 0) * COALESCE("donation"."givbackFactor", 0)) AS "totalUsdWithGivbackFactor"
519-522:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid returning a default value on error without notification.
Returning
0in thecatchblock may mask errors and cause the calling functions to misinterpret the result as no eligible donations. Instead, consider rethrowing the error or returning a specific error value to indicate that an error occurred.Apply this diff to rethrow the error:
} catch (e) { logger.error('getSumOfGivbackEligibleDonationsForSpecificRound() error', e); - return 0; + throw e; }Alternatively, handle the error in a way that ensures the calling function is aware of the failure and can respond appropriately.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.} catch (e) { logger.error('getSumOfGivbackEligibleDonationsForSpecificRound() error', e); throw e; }src/resolvers/donationResolver.ts (2)
464-469:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure 'givPrice' is valid to prevent division by zero errors.
There's a risk of a division by zero when calculating
allocatedGivTokensifgivPriceis zero or undefined. This would cause a runtime error.Apply this diff to validate
givPricebefore performing the calculation:+if (!givPrice || givPrice <= 0) { + throw new Error('Invalid GIV price: cannot be zero or undefined.'); +} const allocatedGivTokens = Math.ceil( Math.min(maxSentGivInRound, usdValueSentAmountInPowerRound / givPrice), );Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const givPrice = await getTokenPrice(NETWORK_IDS.MAIN_NET, givToken); const maxSentGivInRound = 1_000_000; if (!givPrice || givPrice <= 0) { throw new Error('Invalid GIV price: cannot be zero or undefined.'); } const allocatedGivTokens = Math.ceil( Math.min(maxSentGivInRound, usdValueSentAmountInPowerRound / givPrice), );
479-485: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use a robust caching mechanism instead of 'setTimeout'.
Utilizing
setTimeoutfor cache invalidation may lead to memory leaks over time, especially if this method is called frequently. This approach can also be unreliable in a production environment where the application might restart, causing the timeout to reset.Consider using a dedicated caching library like
node-cacheorlru-cachethat handles expiration more efficiently. These libraries provide built-in methods for setting time-to-live (TTL) values and automatic cache invalidation.Apply this diff to integrate a caching library:
+import NodeCache from 'node-cache'; +const cache = new NodeCache({ stdTTL: 3600 }); // Cache expires after 1 hour @Query(_returns => AllocatedGivbacks, { nullable: true }) async allocatedGivbacks( @Arg('refreshCache', { nullable: true }) refreshCache?: boolean, ): Promise<AllocatedGivbacks> { - if (allocatedGivbacksCache && !refreshCache) { - return allocatedGivbacksCache; - } + const cacheKey = 'allocatedGivbacks'; + if (!refreshCache) { + const cachedData = cache.get(cacheKey); + if (cachedData) { + return cachedData; + } + } // ... [existing code to calculate allocatedGivTokens] ... - allocatedGivbacksCache = { + const result = { allocatedGivTokens, givPrice, usdValueSentAmountInPowerRound, date, }; - // 60 minute cache - const sentGivbackCacheTimeout = 1000 * 60 * 60; - - setTimeout(() => { - allocatedGivbacksCache = null; - }, sentGivbackCacheTimeout); + cache.set(cacheKey, result); return result; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/repositories/donationRepository.test.ts (4)
1468-1754: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated code into helper functions.
The setup code for creating projects, donors, and donations is repeated across multiple test cases. Extracting this code into reusable helper functions will reduce duplication and enhance maintainability.
1468-1754: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use constants for donation status values.
Throughout the test cases, the
statusproperty is assigned string literals like'verified'and'pending'. To improve consistency and reduce the risk of typos, consider using theDONATION_STATUSconstants imported from'../entities/donation'.Apply this diff to use status constants:
- status: 'verified', + status: DONATION_STATUS.VERIFIED,Similarly, replace all instances where
statusis set with string literals.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
1729-1730:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for null or undefined
walletAddress.When creating
donor3, thewalletAddressofverifiedProjectis used. Ensure thatwalletAddressis notundefinedornullbefore using it to prevent potential runtime errors.Apply this diff to handle potential null values:
- const donor3 = await saveUserDirectlyToDb( - verifiedProject!.walletAddress as string, - ); + if (verifiedProject.walletAddress) { + const donor3 = await saveUserDirectlyToDb(verifiedProject.walletAddress); + } else { + throw new Error('verifiedProject.walletAddress is undefined'); + }This adds a check to ensure
walletAddressis available.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
1755-1824:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid side effects from global state in tests.
The test relies on setting a global
powerRoundvalue usingsetPowerRound. If tests are executed concurrently, this can cause unpredictable results due to shared state. Consider mocking or isolating thepowerRoundstate within the test to prevent interference with other tests.Apply this refactor to isolate the
powerRoundstate:- await setPowerRound(powerRound); + // Mock the powerRound value within the function or use dependency injectionThis ensures that the test remains self-contained and does not affect global state.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
src/resolvers/donationResolver.test.ts (2)
4973-5165: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor duplicate setup code in test cases
Both test cases within
allocatedGivbacksQueryTestCasescontain similar setup code for creating projects, donors, and donations. Consider refactoring this common code into a shared helper function or usingbeforeEachto reduce duplication and enhance maintainability.
4972-4972:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using
asyncwithdescribefunctionsThe
allocatedGivbacksQueryTestCasesfunction is used as a callback indescribe, and using theasynckeyword ondescribecallbacks is generally discouraged as it may cause unexpected behavior in Mocha tests. It's recommended to removeasyncfrom the function declaration.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-async function allocatedGivbacksQueryTestCases() { +function allocatedGivbacksQueryTestCases() {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.function allocatedGivbacksQueryTestCases() {src/services/cronJobs/checkQRTransactionJob.ts (1)
151-153:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential errors from
calculateGivbackFactorSince
calculateGivbackFactoris an asynchronous operation that may fail, it's advisable to handle potential errors to prevent unhandled exceptions.Apply this diff to add error handling:
try { const { givbackFactor, projectRank, bottomRankInRound, powerRound } = await calculateGivbackFactor(project.id); +} catch (error) { + logger.error( + `Error calculating givback factors for project ID ${project.id}:`, + error, + ); + // Decide how to handle the error, e.g., set default values or abort the operation + return; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests