Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tangible improvements to licensing and software info #41

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Tangible improvements to licensing and software info #41

Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
5c0b664
Corrected licensing and software info
comradekingu Jan 1, 2021
0ee2784
Spelling: double-entry, -solaris
comradekingu Jan 1, 2021
d9f5e40
Spelling: One sentence
comradekingu Jan 1, 2021
d82669a
Accounting in title
comradekingu Jan 1, 2021
dce6e82
Avoid insinuating it is only GPLv2+ in some cases
comradekingu Jan 1, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions externals/global_params.php
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -82,6 +82,6 @@
$URL_WIKI="https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/";

// some defaults for metatags in case the page does not set them
$default_title= T_("Free Accounting Software");
$default_description= T_("<span class=\"gnucash\">GnuCash</span> is personal and small-business financial-accounting software, freely licensed under the <a href=\"https://www.gnu.org/\">GNU</a> GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows.");
$default_title= T_("Copylefted Libre Software");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this grade of relabeling should be done after discussion on the gnucash-devel mailing list. IANA

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not wild about "Copylefted Libre" to replace "Free". Just "Libre" would be better, "Free/Libre" is widely used and might be best of all. Regardless it should say what kind of Free/Libre software it is so "Accounting" should stay.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whatever the order, I think they are all points to make (once).
It similarly already says "Freely licensed" below. I haven't seen Free/Libre anywhere I can think of. Not sure why it would be better.
It is possible to be copyleft without being libre (I think), and it is also something in addition to it, so that makes sense to point out in my head. Explanations along the line of "Use, see, change and share at will; with all." make sense to me.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't seen Free/Libre anywhere I can think of.

You must not have looked very hard

It is possible to be copyleft without being libre

Nope.

it is also something in addition to it

It is indeed, but that's of interest only to people who create derivative works and for them it's sufficient to say that GnuCash is licensed under the GPL.

Whatever the order, I think they are all points to make (once).

Do you not understand that "Title" and "Description" are complimentary and the latter often repeats with more detail the former?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@comradekingu comradekingu Jan 1, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well I tried looking for it now, and couldn't find anything that isn't some variant of "FLOSS", or FLO… https://wiki.snowdrift.coop/about/free-libre-open

Maybe the point is esoteric, but there could for example be non-commercial copylefted works(?)

I would argue the requirement to share distributed derivative works is of interest to everyone it could benefit. It isn't saying everything is good or even beneficial to all if good in any capacity. The requirement in my view is in the interest of everyone at the level it benefits nobody in particular.

I do understand the relation of title/desc, but would rather keep all redundancy to a minimum and then clarify if need be. No clear inroads on getting to a salient point is being made here. The reader has to already be aware of the duality of "free", which is sure to get lost in translation as a further element to decipher. It adds a flowchart of possibilities rather than narrowing anything down, and that isn't explaining anything well. "Free" is right next to a bank card and some coins, so one would be excused for thinking it is only meant as a monetary point to make. Already "accounting" leads one to think in terms of financial gain or loss. That is my thinking anyway.

To Illustrate my near complete ineptitude, I don't even understand that there is some "accounting software" that isn't "financial" (in any way that would leave room for actual confusion). So that amounts to repetition without the panache of linguistic acuity to me.

If it is explained well, I think "copylefted libre software" is the bigger point to make. Right now it isn't even drowning out the idea of money being saved. "Welcome to GnuCash.org" prominent, when it doesn't really do much, or anything over just "Welcome".

comradekingu marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
$default_description= T_("<span class=\"gnucash\">GnuCash</span> is double-entry accounting software (licensed <a href=\"https://www.gnu.org/\">GPLv2+</a>) for people and small-businesses using Linux|GNU, BSD, macOS and Windows.");
comradekingu marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
?>